Get access

Obama on the Stump: Features and Determinants of a Rhetorical Approach

Authors

  • KEVIN COE,

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Arizona
      Kevin Coe is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Arizona.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • MICHAEL REITZES

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Arizona
      Michael Reitzes is a political strategist who worked as a field organizer for Barack Obama's presidential campaign.
    Search for more papers by this author

Kevin Coe is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Arizona.

Michael Reitzes is a political strategist who worked as a field organizer for Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

Abstract

From the moment Barack Obama entered the national political scene in 2004, his formidable rhetorical skills were a central component of his public persona and his political success. Not surprisingly, a growing body of research has examined Obama's rhetorical techniques. Thus far, however, these studies have consisted almost entirely of qualitative analyses of single speeches, making it difficult to generalize about the broader features of Obama's rhetorical approach and impossible to understand the determinants of his rhetorical choices. This study fills these gaps in the literature by systematically tracking Obama's rhetoric over the course of campaign 2008 and testing competing explanations for the variation that occurs during this period. Using a unique computer-assisted content analysis procedure that draws coding categories directly from the more than 11,500 distinct words that Obama used during his campaign, the authors analyze 183 speeches and debates from his announcement of candidacy in February 2007 to his victory speech in November 2008. Obama's campaign rhetoric varied by speaking context, geography, and poll position, indicating a twofold rhetorical approach of emphasizing policy and thematic appeals while downplaying more contentious issues.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary