Get access

Cable and the Partisan Polarization of the President's Audience

Authors

  • SAMUEL KERNELL,

    Corresponding author
    1. University of California San Diego
      Samuel Kernell is Distinguished Professor of Political Science at University of California San Diego. He is currently writing a book on the effects of veto threats on legislation.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • LAURIE L. RICE

    Corresponding author
    1. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
      Laurie L. Rice is an assistant professor of political science at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Her research focuses on presidential influence as well as presidential campaigns and civic engagement.
    Search for more papers by this author

Samuel Kernell is Distinguished Professor of Political Science at University of California San Diego. He is currently writing a book on the effects of veto threats on legislation.

Laurie L. Rice is an assistant professor of political science at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Her research focuses on presidential influence as well as presidential campaigns and civic engagement.

Abstract

Presidents' audiences have been shrinking over time. Prior research suggests that the rise of cable television is to blame. We investigate whether this shrinkage is occurring disproportionately among those the president most needs to persuade—disapprovers of his performance. Analyzing both A. C. Nielsen's audience ratings and self-reports of speech watching from 32 postspeech surveys, we find that as the share of households subscribing to cable has grown, the statistical relationship between the president's approval rating and the percentage watching his televised speeches has strengthened commensurately for each group of party identifiers. Consequently, as presidential approval ratings have polarized during the past two decades, so too has the partisan composition of presidents' audiences, a phenomenon unknown during the broadcast era. Modern presidents thus find themselves increasingly preaching to their party choir and losing the capacity to influence public opinion more broadly.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary