Circumventing Adversity: Executive Orders and Divided Government

Authors

  • JEFFREY A. FINE,

    Corresponding author
    1. Clemson University
      Jeffrey A. Fine is an assistant professor of political science at Clemson University. He has published articles in the Journal of Politics, Political Research Quarterly, and Political Behavior.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • ADAM L. WARBER

    Corresponding author
    1. Clemson University
      Adam L. Warber is an associate professor of political science at Clemson University. He is the author of Executive Orders and the Modern Presidency, and his main research interests are the administrative presidency and the unilateral presidency.
    Search for more papers by this author

  • AUTHORS' NOTE: The authors would like to thank Rick Waterman, Mac Avery, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Jeffrey A. Fine is an assistant professor of political science at Clemson University. He has published articles in the Journal of Politics, Political Research Quarterly, and Political Behavior.

Adam L. Warber is an associate professor of political science at Clemson University. He is the author of Executive Orders and the Modern Presidency, and his main research interests are the administrative presidency and the unilateral presidency.

Abstract

Scholars of the unilateral presidency are left with an empirical puzzle regarding whether and how divided government influences presidential use of executive orders. While the strategic model suggests that presidents should issue more executive orders when faced with an adverse situation vis-à-vis Congress, most of the research finds just the opposite. We offer a more appropriate test of the strategic model by examining how presidential-congressional adversity influences presidential decisions to issue symbolic, routine, and major policy executive orders. We find support for the strategic model and present new findings to demonstrate that presidents behave differently with respect to distinct types of executive orders during periods of unified and divided government.

Ancillary