Get access

Public Health Decision-Makers' Informational Needs and Preferences for Receiving Research Evidence

Authors


  • This research study was funded by the Neimier Fund, McMaster University. Maureen Dobbins is a career scientist with the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

  • The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Address correspondence to Maureen Dobbins, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, 3N25G Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5; dobbinsm@mcmaster.ca

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify decision-makers' preferences for the transfer and exchange of research knowledge. This article is focused on how the participants define evidence-based decision-making and their preferences for receiving research evidence to integrate into the decision-making process.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 16 Ontario public health decision-makers from six Ontario public health units in this fundamental qualitative descriptive study. The sample included nine program managers, six directors, and one Medical Officer of Health. Participants were asked to define the term evidence-based decision-making and identify preferred research dissemination strategies. The interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and coded for emerging concepts.

Results: Participants defined evidence-based decision-making as a process whereby multiple sources of information were consulted before making a decision concerning the provision of services. To facilitate integration of research evidence into the decision-making process, public health administrators appreciate receiving, in both electronic and hard copy, systematic reviews, executive summaries of research, and clear statements of implications for practice from health service researchers.

Conclusions: Although consensus exists among participants concerning the definition of evidence based public health decision-making, ongoing efforts are required to continue to promote the use of research evidence in program planning and public health policy. It is also important to continue to improve the ease with which public health decision-makers access systematic reviews, as well as to ensure the relevance and applicability of the results to the practice setting.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary