• 1
    Smith AM (1999) Making starch. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2, 223229.
  • 2
    Kossmann J & Lloyd J (2000) Understanding and influencing starch biochemistry. Crit Rev Plant Sci 19, 171226.
  • 3
    Nakamura Y (2002) Towards a better understanding of the metabolic system for amylopectin biosynthesis in plants: rice endosperm as a model tissue. Plant Cell Physiol 43, 718725.
  • 4
    Ball SG & Morell MK (2003) From bacterial glycogen to starch: understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54, 207233.
  • 5
    Tetlow IJ, Morell MK & Emes MJ (2004) Recent developments in understanding the regulation of starch metabolism in higher plants. J Exp Bot 55, 21312145.
  • 6
    Smith AM, Denyer K & Martin C (1997) The synthesis of the starch granule. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48, 6787.
  • 7
    Ball SG, van de Wal MHBJ & Visser RGF (1998) Progress in understanding the biosynthesis of amylose. Trends Plant Sci 3, 13601385.
  • 8
    Denyer K, Johnson P, Zeeman S & Smith AM (2001) The control of amylose synthesis. J Plant Physiol 158, 479487.
  • 9
    Li Z, Mouille G, Kosar-Hashemi B, Rahman S, Clarke B, Gale KR, Appels R & Morell MK (2000) The structure and expression of the wheat starch synthase III gene. Motifs in the expressed gene define the lineage of the starch synthase III gene family. Plant Physiol 123, 613624.
  • 10
    Palopoli N, Busi MV, Fornasari MS, Gomez-Casati D, Ugalde R & Parisi G (2006) Starch-synthase III family encodes a tandem of three starch-binding domains. Proteins 65, 2731.
  • 11
    Machovic̆ M & JaneC̆ek S (2006) The evolution of putative starch-binding domains. FEBS Lett 580, 63496356.
  • 12
    Bolam DN, Ciruela A, Mcqueen-Mason S, Simpson P, Williamson MP, Rixon JE, Boraston A, Hazlewood GP & Gilbert HJ (1998) Pseudomonas cellulose-binding domains mediate their effects by increasing enzyme substrate proximity. Biochem J 331, 775781.
  • 13
    Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ & Davies GJ (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382, 769781.
  • 14
    Shannon JC & Garwood DL (1984) Genetics and physiology of starch development. In Starch: Chemistry and Technology (Whistler RL, BeMiller JN & Paschall EF, eds), pp. 2886. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • 15
    Wang YJ, White P, Pollak L & Jane JL (1993) Characterization of starch structures of 17 maize endosperm mutant genotypes with Oh43 inbred line background. Cereal Chem 70, 171179.
  • 16
    Gao M, Wanat J, Stinard PS, James MG & Myers AM (1998) Characterization of dull1, a maize gene coding for a novel starch synthase. Plant Cell 10, 399412.
  • 17
    Edwards A, Fulton DC, Hylton CM, Jobling SA, Gidley M, Rössner U, Martin C & Smith AM (1999) A combined reduction in activity of starch synthase II and III of potato has novel effects on the starch of tubers. Plant J 17, 251261.
  • 18
    Lloyd JR, Landschütze V & Kossmann J (1999) Simultaneous antisense inhibition of two starch-synthase isoforms in potato tubers leads to accumulation of grossly modified amylopectin. Biochem J 338, 515521.
  • 19
    Fulton DC, Edwards A, Pilling E, Robinson HL, Fahy B, Seale R, Kato L, Donald AM, Geigenberger P, Martin C et al. (2002) Role of granule-bound starch synthase in determination of amylopectin structure and starch granule morphology in potato. J Biol Chem 277, 1083410841.
  • 20
    Zhang X, Myers AM & James MG (2005) Mutations affecting starch synthase III in Arabidopsis alter leaf starch structure and increase the rate of starch synthesis. Plant Physiol 138, 663674.
  • 21
    Singletary GW, Banisadr R & Keeling PL (1997) Influence of gene dosage on carbohydrate synthesis and enzymatic activities in endosperm of starch-deficient mutants of maize. Plant Physiol 113, 293304.
  • 22
    Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S & von Heijne G (2000) Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol 300, 10051016.
  • 23
    Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H & von Heijne G (1999) A neural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites. Protein Sci 8, 978984.
  • 24
    Thompson JD, Higgins DG & Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 46734680.
  • 25
    Jones DT (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 292, 195202.
  • 26
    Sorimachi K, Jacks AJ, Le Gal-Coëffet M, Williamson G, Archer DB & Williamson MP (1996) Solution structure of the granular starch binding domain of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 259, 970987.
  • 27
    Sorimachi K, Le Gal-Coëffet M, Williamson G, Archer DB & Williamson MP (1997) Solution structure of the granular starch binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase bound to β-cyclodextrin. Structure 5, 647661.
  • 28
    Giardina T, Gunning AP, Juge N, Faulds CB, Furniss CSM, Svensson B, Morris VJ & Williamson G (2001) Both binding sites of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase are essential for inducing a conformational change in amylose. J Mol Biol 313, 11491159.
  • 29
    Edwards A, Marshall J, Denyer K, Sidebottom C, Visser RGF, Martin C & Smith AM (1996) Evidence that a 77-kilodalton protein from the starch of pea embryos is an isoform of starch synthase that is both soluble and granule bound. Plant Physiol 112, 8997.
  • 30
    Senoura T, Isono N, Yoshikawa M, Asao A, Hamada S, Watanabe K, Ito H & Matsui H (2004) Characterization of starch synthase I and II expressed in early developing seeds of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biosci Biotech Biochem 68, 19491960.
  • 31
    Imparl-Radosevich JM, Li P, Zhang L, McKean AL, Keeling PL & Guan H (1998) Purification and characterization of maize starch synthase I and its truncated forms. Arch Biochem Biophys 353, 6472.
  • 32
    Edwards A, Borthakur A, Bornemann S, Venail J, Denyer K, Waite D, Fulton D, Smith A & Martin C (1999) Specificity of starch synthase isoforms from potato. Eur J Biochem 266, 724736.
  • 33
    Commuri PD & Keeling PL (2001) Chain-length specificities of maize starch synthase I enzyme: studies of glucan affinity and catalytic properties. Plant J 25, 475486.
  • 34
    Edwards A, Marshall J, Sidebottom C, Visser RGF, Smith AM & Martin C (1995) Biochemical and molecular characterization of a novel starch synthase from potato tubers. Plant J 8, 283294.
  • 35
    Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248254.
  • 36
    Isono N, Ito H, Senoura T, Yoshikawa M, Nozaki K & Matsui H (2003) Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding granule-bound starch synthase I from kidney bean and expression in Escherichia coli. J Appl Glycosci 50, 355360.
  • 37
    Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA & Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28, 350356.
  • 38
    Hizukuri S, Takeda Y & Yasuda M (1981) Multi-branched nature of amylose and the action of debranching enzymes. Carbohydr Res 94, 205213.