• catalytic activity;
  • differential expression;
  • dimerization;
  • ligand binding;
  • oxidation;
  • phosphorylation;
  • (R)PTP;
  • (receptor) protein-tyrosine phosphate;
  • regulation;
  • subcellular localization


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Protein-tyrosine phosphatases are tightly controlled by various mechanisms, ranging from differential expression in specific cell types to restricted subcellular localization, limited proteolysis, post-translational modifications affecting intrinsic catalytic activity, ligand binding and dimerization. Here, we review the regulatory mechanisms found to control the classical protein-tyrosine phosphatases.


epidermal growth factor


endoplasmic reticulum


platelet-derived growth factor


peroxiredoxin II


protein-tyrosine kinase


protein-tyrosine phosphatase




reactive oxygen species


transforming growth factor

Protein phosphorylation on tyrosine residues is an important cell-signaling mechanism, controlled by the combined actions of protein-tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). PTKs are tightly regulated by various mechanisms. Whereas PTPs were initially regarded as household enzymes with constitutive activity, dephosphorylating all the substrates they encountered, evidence is now accumulating that PTPs are tightly regulated. As described elsewhere in this minireview series, the human genome encodes around 100 enzymes that have the capacity to dephosphorylate phosphotyrosine (pTyr) in proteins [1,2]. We focus on the regulatory mechanisms of classical PTPs, a cysteine-based subclass of the PTP superfamily that exclusively dephosphorylates pTyr in proteins. Classical PTPs comprise cytoplasmic and transmembrane proteins that are tentatively called receptor (R)PTPs. Characterization of the catalytic activities of PTPs indicated that their enzymatic activity is extremely high with a kcat value up to three orders of magnitude higher than that of the PTKs, the enzymatic counterpart of the PTPs. All cells express multiple PTKs and PTPs, therefore, tyrosine phosphorylation can occur in cells only if PTPs are tightly regulated. Different levels of regulation can be discerned from the organismal through the cellular to the molecular level as indicated in Fig. 1. Here, we discuss the different regulatory mechanisms that have evolved.


Figure 1.  Regulation of PTPs at different levels. (top to bottom) PTPs are differentially expressed in specific organs, tissues or cells. Within cells, PTPs are directed to specific subcellular locations. At the molecular level, PTPs are regulated by post-translational modifications.

Download figure to PowerPoint


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Differential expression of PTPs is an obvious regulator of PTP function. Among the PTPs are ubiquitously expressed family members such as SHP2 or PTP1B, and more selectively expressed members that are abundant in neuronal or hematopoietic compartments [3–5]. However, in a given cell type, such as endothelial cells, many of the 38 classical PTP genes appear to be expressed, at least as represented by low mRNA levels [6] (see PTP mRNA expression is regulated by different mechanisms. Induction of the expression of several PTP genes has, for example, been reported upon neuronal or hematopoietic differentiation [7–11] and a number of PTPs are upregulated in cells reaching high densities, including DEP-1 [12], PTP-LAR [8], RPTPμ [13], RPTPk [14], and PTPβ/VE-PTP [15]. A highly dynamic expression pattern for PTPs has been seen during the onset and termination of smooth muscle cell proliferation in restenosis [16]. In cancer cells, mRNA expression of some PTPs is downregulated by promoter methylation [17].

Relatively few studies have addressed the detailed mechanisms involved in the transcriptional regulation of specific PTP mRNAs. An example is analysis of the PTP1B promoter, which identified a region involved in the induction of PTP1B expression by p210 BCR-Abl activity. This region was designated PRS and interacts with Egr-1 and SP-family transcription factors [18]. Y box-binding protein-1 (YB-1) is another transcriptional inducer of PTP1B and acts by binding to an enhancer element between -152 and -132 of the PTP1B promoter [19]. In a recent search for novel Smad targets in transforming growth factor (TGF)β-stimulated mammary epithelial cells, the PTPκ-encoding gene PTPRK was identified [20]. Although details of transcriptional regulation are still unknown, upregulation of PTPκ through the Smad pathway seems to mediate several of the TGFβ responses in these cells, including inhibition of cell proliferation and enhanced cell motility.

Alternate use of promoters within PTP genes is another mechanism that can lead to tissue-specific PTP mRNA expression, as in the case of SHP1 [21], or to the expression of different PTP isoforms, as for RPTPε. In the latter case, alternate promoter use leads to the expression of either a transmembrane RPTPε molecule or a soluble, cytoplasmic version of PTPε with presumably important consequences for the access to substrates [22]. Similarly, three distinct promoters can direct the generation of several isoforms of PTPRR proteins in neuronal cells, of which some are cytoplasmic [23].

Regulation of mRNA stability may be another important level of control in PTP expression. In their analysis of PTP genes, Andersen et al. [2] observed that PTP genes often encode long 3′-UTRs, which may be important in this respect. Very few studies have addressed this issue. For example, increased stability of TC-PTP, but not PTP1B, mRNA has been observed in mitogen-stimulated T lymphocytes [24].

Although largely unexplored, PTP levels are likely to also be controlled at the levels of translation and protein stability. Several PTP proteins exhibit rather long half-lives, for example, SHP2 [25], whereas short half-lives have been shown for different isoforms of PTPRR [26]. A cell-density-dependent increase in the expression level of RPTPμ has been attributed to a reduced rate of degradation when this PTP becomes engaged in homophilic interactions upon cell–cell contacts [27].

Subcellular localization

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Like protein phosphorylation, dephosphorylation by PTPs is required in a cell-compartment-specific manner. Protein–protein interaction domains and compartment-specific targeting domains in PTPs serve to achieve the required PTP localization [28,29] from the cell surface to the nucleus (Fig. 2).


Figure 2.  Subcellular localization of PTPs. Cytoplasmic PTPs are recruited to activated cell-surface receptors by SH2, proline-rich FERM (band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin homology) and PDZ (postsynaptic density protein 95, discs large, Zonula occludens) domains. RPTPs are also engaged in these complexes. Nuclear localization signals (NLS) and ER targeting domains direct PTPs to these compartments. A Sec14-homology domain (Sec14h) mediates functional association with secretory versicles. Cytoplasmic PTPs are recruited into lipid rafts by different domains. The kinase-interacting motif (KIM) in PTPs mediates binding to MAPK. Proteolysis releases the catalytic domain of (R)PTPs into the cytoplasm and possibly also into the nucleus.

Download figure to PowerPoint

At the plasma membrane, RPTPs regulate tyrosine phosphorylation as it occurs in response to cell stimulation of PTK-coupled receptors [30] or in the context of cell–cell or cell–matrix adhesion [31,32]. Complex formation of RPTPs with substrates is important in these cases and has been shown, for example, with several RTKs [33,34]. RPTP domains which mediate such interactions remain to be identified. In addition, cytoplasmic PTPs are recruited to the sites of cell-surface tyrosine phosphorylation. Paradigms are SHP1 and SHP2, which are recruited to tyrosine-phosphorylated cell-surface receptors and adaptor proteins through their SH2 domains [3,4], whose recognition specificities have recently been elucidated in great detail [35]. Interestingly, the C-terminus of SHP1 seems to be involved in targeting this PTP to the plasma membrane. It has previously been shown, that the SHP1 C-terminus harbors a high-affinity binding site for acidic phospholipids [36]. Recent studies revealed that this site is important for targeting SHP1 to lipid rafts in T lymphocytes, where it regulates T-cell receptor signaling [37]. Similarly, HePTP is targeted to lipid rafts. In this case, targeting depends on prior phosphorylation by a PKC isoform [38]. Another non-transmembrane PTP that regulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of surface receptors is PTP1B [39]. Very efficient substrate recognition by this PTP occurs by its catalytic domain [40,41]. However, non-catalytic interactions with substrates may also be important for PTP1B recruitment. A recently published crystal structure revealed binding of PTP1B in a phosphotyrosine-independent manner to the ‘backside’ of the insulin receptor, an interaction that may facilitate the rapid engagement of substrate residues upon insulin–receptor activation [42]. Interestingly, PTP1B can also be recruited to substrates via adaptor molecules. Phospholipase Cγ1 serves as a scaffold downstream of the activated growth hormone receptor and recruits PTP1B by an as yet unknown mechanism into a ternary complex with JAK2, leading to JAK2 dephosphorylation [43]. It will be interesting to see if phospholipase Cγ1, which binds to many cell-surface receptors, mediates the interaction of PTP1B with other targets as well. Recruitment of non-transmembrane PTPs to cell–cell adhesion complexes and cell–matrix adhesion complexes occurs, for example, via FERM and PDZ domains as in PTP-BAS and via proline-rich domains as in PTP-PEST [28,29,31,32].

Some PTPs reside in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The best investigated in this respect is PTP1B whose C-terminus contains an ER-anchoring hydrophobic sequence [39]. Spatial distribution of PTP1B activity over the cell has recently been shown using sophisticated FRET analyses. Most cellular PTP1B activity resides in a perinuclear compartment, whereas the more peripheral PTP1B population has lower activity [44]. How PTP1B can access sites of tyrosine phosphorylation at the cell surface is the topic of intense investigation. In the case of activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), interaction with PTP1B takes place in conjunction with endocytosis at the surface of ER membranes, which extend far into the cell periphery [45]. PTP1B, which remains bound to the ER, can also access cell–matrix adhesions and this process involves microtubule activity [46]. Is there a function of PTP1B (and possibly other PTPs) in the ER itself? One function seems to be the regulation of ER stress [47]. Furthermore, it was observed early on that PTP1B can effectively dephosphorylate precursor molecules of cell-surface receptors, such as the insulin receptor or the EGF receptor in the ER, during biogenesis [48,49]. Recently, dephosphorylation of ER-bound immature forms of different RTKs of the PDGFR family, notably of FLT3, has been shown to enhance their maturation to complex glycosylated surface receptors [50]. Similar observations have been made for FGFR3 [51,52]. Spontaneous basal activity of RTKs appears to present an obstacle for efficient processing and an important function of ER-bound PTPs may be suppression of this activity. It should be noted that RPTPs share localization in the ER with maturing RTKs and may also participate in suppression of detrimental RTK basal activity. PTPs may also affect further aspects of RTK trafficking. For example, recycling of internalized PDGFβ-receptor is enhanced in cells lacking T-cell PTP [53].

An interesting, recently explored example of cellular targeting is the localization of PTP-MEG2 to secretory vesicles, where it dephosphorylates N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor and thereby regulates vesicle fusion [54]. A Sec14-homology domain at the N-terminus of PTP-MEG2 ensures this localization by mediating interactions with resident proteins, such as TIP47 [55].

In the cytoplasm, the specificity of the interaction of PTPs with soluble substrates is enhanced by targeting domains, as exemplified by the kinase-interaction motif which directs HePTP, STEP and PTPRR isoforms to members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family and facilitates effective dephosphorylation [56,57].

Finally, PTP activity is also needed in the nucleus. Dephosphorylation of tyrosine phosphorylated members of the STAT family is important for terminating STAT signaling, and for recycling of dephosphorylated STAT molecules into the cytoplasm [58]. An important PTP in this context is TC-PTP. An ER-bound 48-kDa version and a 45-kDa version that can shuttle into the nucleus are generated by alternative splicing [49,59]. Nuclear localization of the 45-kDa TC-PTP is accomplished by a nuclear localization signal that is not functional in the 48-kDa isoform. The 45-kDa TC-PTP can effectively suppress STAT1 signaling [60] and may also dephosphorylate STAT3 [61]. SHP1 can localize to the nucleus in some cell types and in response to certain cell stimuli, based on a nuclear localization signal in its C-terminus, however, the functional role of nuclear SHP1 remains to be clarified [62]. SHP2 has been shown to dephosphorylate STAT5, however, in this case dephosphorylation occurs in the cytosol [63] and is unlikely to function in signal termination. Tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT3 has been identified as a possible substrate of RPTPρ/RPTPT [64]. This may occur proximal to the receptor or an as yet unidentified proteolytic fragment of RPTPρ may have access to nuclear pSTAT3.

Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis may lead to specific changes in the domain structure of PTPs, resulting in functionally different PTP splice variants. Among the receptor-like PTPs, alternative splicing frequently gives rise to structural variants of the extracellular domains [9,65–68], which results in a different profile of ligand interaction [69,70] or in the generation of secreted molecules which engage in alternate ligand/receptor interactions [68,71,72].

Alternative splicing may also result in changes in the regulatory domains. For example, the C-terminus of SHP1 is extended and altered in its amino acid sequence in SHP1-L, a long form of SHP1 generated by exon skipping [73], leading to loss of the raft-targeting sequence and an essential part of the nuclear localization sequence. In PTP-BAS, alternative splicing affects the ligand specificity of one of the PDZ domains [74]. Further, altered PTP activity may be caused by alternative splicing, as shown for SHP2 [75] and recently for RPTPα [76]. Splicing events are regulated, and occur upon acquisition of certain differentiation stages or in response to growth factor stimulation [68,77].

At the post-translational level, many PTPs are regulated in activity and function by limited proteolysis. RPTPs of the R2A family (LAR, RPTPσ and RPTPδ) and the R2B-MAM family (RPTPμ, RPTPκ, RPTPρ and RPTPλ) undergo proteolytic cleavage in the extracellular domain by furin-like proteinases/convertases during their biogenesis, and the mature PTPs are composed of non-covalently associated extracellular (E) and transmembrane–intracellular (P) domains [78,79]. Additional proteolysis occurs when cells are stimulated with phorbol esters or Ca2+-ionophores [80,81] or, in case of MAM-domain PTPs, when cells reach high densities [13,82]. The latter leads to shedding of the extracellular domains and internalization and redistribution of the remaining PTPs [80]. Recent studies have identified further mechanistic details and suggest putative functions for the shedding process in case of MAM-domain PTPs. Secondary cleavage of mature RPTPκ at high cell density occurs by ADAM10, followed by a third, intra-membrane cleavage through the action of γ-secretase. Interestingly, the phosphatase intracellular portion generated in this process was localized to the nucleus [82]. Recent elucidation of the crystal structure of the extracellular domain of RPTPμ (see below) suggests that RPTPμ is acting as a sensor for cell–cell contacts and is locked in cell–cell adherence junctions by a ‘spacer–clamp’ mechanism to regulate the tyrosine phosphorylation of other junction components. Shedding of the extracellular domain is predicted to allow truncated RPTPμ to leave the junctions [83].

Limited proteolysis is also common in non-transmembrane PTPs. For example, caspase-mediated limited proteolysis of PTP-PEST has recently been linked to the regulation of apoptosis [84]. Fragmentation of PTP-PEST by caspase 3 leads to elevated PTP activity, resulting in an altered interaction between PTP-PEST and adaptor molecules such as Paxillin and facilitating detachment of the cell from the substratum. Notably, degradation of PTP-PEST upon apoptosis was relatively specific and could not be seen with a range of other PTPs. Several PTPs, including PTP1B, PTP-MEG, and SHP1 can undergo limited cleavage by calpain in response to an elevation in intracellular Ca2+ levels in platelets [85–88], leading initially to enzyme activation by removing domains that exert negative regulation. Upon platelet aggregation, calpain, however, eventually degrades completely and inactivates PTP1B, a process that is critical for efficient thrombus formation in vivo [89]. Another inactivating calpain-dependent cleavage of PTP1B has been seen in epithelial cells upon UVA/B irradiation and requires reversible oxidation (see below) of the PTP [90]. It is important to further elucidate the function of calpain for regulation of PTP activity and PTP localization in more cell types and signaling pathways.

Post-translational modification: phosphorylation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Many PTPs are regulated by covalent post-translational modifications (Fig. 3). In general, phosphorylation modulates the catalytic activity of enzymes directly by allosteric mechanisms or by providing binding sites for other proteins. Phosphorylation was recognized as a potential regulatory mechanism for PTPs early on [91] and several classical PTPs, including CD45, PTP1B and PTP-PEST, were identified as being phosphorylated on serine residues [92–95]. However, relatively little is known about how phosphorylation regulates PTPs. RPTPα is phosphorylated on two serine residues in the juxtamembrane domain, Ser180 and Ser204 [96], and phosphorylation of these sites stimulates catalytic activity [97]. These two phosphorylation sites are located close to the wedge-like helix–loop–helix structure that is essential for inactivation of the dimeric conformation [98] suggesting that phosphorylation of these sites may lead to disruption of the inactive dimer conformation, thus resulting in catalytic activity. RPTPα is the major activator of Src in mitosis [99,100] and mutation of the two serine phosphorylation sites eliminates the ability of RPTPα to activate Src in mitosis [101]. Whether serine phosphorylation affects the catalytic activity of PTP1B remains to be determined definitively [92,102]. SHP1 and SHP2 are phosphorylated on serine residues in response to PKC activation. SHP2 activity is not affected by serine phosphorylation [103]. Substitution of SHP1 Ser591 by Asp results in reduced catalytic activity, which led Liu et al. [104] to suggest that phosphorylation of this site inhibits SHP1 catalytic activity.


Figure 3.  Post-translational modification of PTPs. Most RPTPs are glycosylated in their extracellular domain (Glc). PTPs are tightly regulated by oxidation of their catalytic-site cysteine, which inhibits catalytic activity. Phosphorylation of serine, threonine and even tyrosine residues is recognized as an important regulatory mechanism of PTPs. Proteolysis in the extracellular domain of RPTPs may lead to shedding of the ectodomain and intracellularly to release of the catalytically active PTP domain. Sumoylation and ubiquitination may be important regulators of PTP stability and/or subcellular localization and thus of their function.

Download figure to PowerPoint

PTPs have also been found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine. Tyrosine phosphorylation of PTPs immediately suggests autoregulatory or feedback mechanisms, making it an intriguing regulatory mechanism for PTPs. CD45 was found to be phosphorylated transiently on tyrosine [105,106]. Moreover, the SH2- containing PTP, SHP2, is phosphorylated on tyrosine [107,108]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2 generates a binding site for the SH2 domain of the adaptor protein GRB2 and SHP2 thus acts as an adaptor protein, linking GRB2-SOS to activated receptor tyrosine kinases [109,110]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 may activate catalytic activity because substitution of the tyrosine-phosphorylation sites by phosphomimetic residues led to enhanced catalytic activity [111,112]. The transmembrane PTP, RPTPα is phosphorylated on a C-terminal tyrosine [113]. This phosphorylation site is a consensus GRB2-binding site and GRB2 binds readily to phosphorylated RPTPα [113,114]. The stoichiometry of Tyr789 phosphorylation is ∼20%, which is similar to the percentage of RPTPα bound to GRB2 [113]. This suggests that all tyrosine-phosphorylated RPTPα is bound to GRB2 which is not surprising in light of the autodephosphorylation activity of RPTPα. Zheng et al. [99,100] developed a model in which pTyr789 binds the SH2 domain of Src, resulting in activation of Src by RPTPα-mediated dephosphorylation of the inhibitory pTyr527 in Src. CD45 can dephosphorylate RPTPα pTyr789 in vitro and RPTPα pTyr789 is not detected in T cells that express CD45, suggesting that RPTPα is a direct substrate of CD45 [115]. The data indicate that there is cross-talk between RPTPs at the level of direct interactions, warranting further investigation into the role of PTPs in the regulation of each other and suggesting the possibility of PTP cascades, much like the kinase cascades identified previously.

Post-translational modification: oxidation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

It is now well established that PTPs are negatively regulated through reversible oxidation of the catalytic-site cysteine [116,117]. Inhibitory oxidation caused by elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been shown for various PTPs following activation of different classes of cell-surface receptors, including receptor PTKs, integrins and G-protein-coupled receptors (Table 1). Cell adherence and density, UV-radiation and cell migration also affect levels of PTP oxidation (Table 1). In most cases, NADPH oxidases or mitochondria have been implied as the sources of ROS.

Table 1.   Oxidation of protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs).
ROS modulatorTarget PTPReferences
Cell-surface receptors/signaling molecules
 Receptor tyrosine kinases
  InsulinRPTP1B, TC-PTP[165,166]
 T-cell receptorSHP2[127]
 B-cell receptor‘BCR-associated PTP’[168]
 Integrins‘FAK-targeting PTP’[169]
  Lipoxin A4    receptorSHP2[170]
  Endothelin 1SHP2[171]
 PrxII‘membrane-associated PTPs’[129]
 UV irradiationRPTPα, RPTPκ, SHP1, DEP1, PTP1B[90,124,172,173]
 Cell densitySHP2[174]
 Endothelial cell  migrationPTP-PEST[128]

The biochemical mechanisms of PTP oxidation have been elucidated in some detail. The 3D structure of reversibly oxidized PTP1B and RPTPα shows a sulfenyl-amide at the catalytic site, formed by a covalent bond between the sulfur of the catalytic cysteine and the backbone nitrogen of the neighboring serine [118–120]. Glutathionylated and nitrosylated versions of the active site cysteine of oxidized PTPs have also been found, in addition to intermolecular Cys–Cys disulfides [121–123].

Therefore, intriguing and previously unrecognized cross-talk exists between PTKs and ROS signaling with PTPs as mediators. Some key aspects of this cross-talk now being explored are the specificity of the signaling, the possibility that enzymes involved in ROS metabolism control tyrosine kinase signaling and the in vivo significance of PTP oxidation.

Protein-tyrosine phosphatase domains of different PTPs display intrinsic differences with regard to susceptibility to oxidation. This was first demonstrated in analyses of RPTPα, which revealed that the second PTP domain is much more readily oxidized than the catalytically more active membrane proximal PTP domain [124]. A large in vitro screen indicates large differences in oxidizability between PTPs that correlates with the conformation of the conserved active-site arginine residue [125]. Similarly, the catalytic activity of a panel of PTPs is differentially sensitive to oxidation [126]. T cells stimulated with increasing concentrations of H2O2 show oxidation of SHP2, but not SHP1 [127]. Interestingly, one study also introduced the possibility of localized ROS signals as a mechanism for specificity by demonstring specific oxidation of PTP-PEST caused by co-localization in focal contacts with an activated NADPH oxidase [128].

The overall concept of PTPs as targets of ROS stimulates studies on PTP and RTK activities in cells where levels of reductases or ROS scavengers are manipulated. Deletion of peroxiredoxin II (PrxII), a peroxidase that eliminates H2O2, decreases PTP activity and stimulates PDGF receptor signaling [129]. Independent evidence for cell-context-dependent differences in PTP oxidation comes from a study showing that SHP2 oxidation, following H2O2 stimulation, varies dramatically between different cell lines [130].

Recent studies support the notion that PTP oxidation is relevant in tissue settings. Restenosis, involving PDGF receptor-dependent vascular smooth muscle proliferation, is enhanced in PrxII−/− mice [129]. Furthermore, systemic treatment with antioxidants in a rabbit model of restenois attenuates lesion formation in a way that involves increased vessel-wall PTP activity and reduced PDGF receptor phosphorylation [131].

Concerning PTP regulation by oxidation, it should be noted that Sdp1, a yeast PTP, was recently shown to be activated by oxidation [132]. Whether this mode of regulation is also relevant for classical PTPs is likely to be explored. However, it should be noted that the activating oxidation-induced disulfide involves a cysteine residue that is not conserved in classical PTPs, indicating that this mode of regulation might be restricted to other subsets of PTPs.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

The highly variable extracellular domains of receptor-like PTPs imply regulatory functions. As indicated in Table 2, efforts over the last 15 years have led to the identification of a number of PTP ligands. Type IIB receptor PTPs, including RPTPμ, RPTPκ and RPTPλ, as well as type IIA RPTPδ, all display homophilic interactions that are important in cell adhesion. RPTPβ/ζ has multiple heterologous interaction partners (Table 2) [66]. However, among these, only pleiotrophin directly modulates the activity of this enzyme, acting as an antagonist of RPTPβ/ζ, thus increasing the phosphorylation of a number of RPTPβ/ζ substrates including β-catenin, β-adducin, p190Rho-GAP and ALK [133–136].

Table 2.   Ligands of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs).
Common nameRPTP classLigand(s)Effect on activityCommentsReferences
CD45R1Galectin-1InhibitionInteraction based on recognition of CD45 carbohydrates[175,176]
RPTPδR2AHomophilic bindingNot reportedExtracellular domain is also a ligand promoting adhesion and neurite outgrowth[177,178]
LARR2ALARFN5CActivationLAR isoform, binds homophilically[72]
Laminin-NidogenNot reportedBinding is specific for a LAR splice version[179]
DLARR2ASyndecan (heparan sulfate proteoglycan)ActivationDLAR ligand[140,141]
Dallylike (heparan sulfate proteoglycan)InhibitionDLAR ligand; competitive binding with Syndecan[141]
HmLAR2 (leech)R2AHomophilic interactionNot reportedInteraction induces repulsive responses in comb cells[180]
RPTPσR2AHeparan sulfate proteoglycans (agrin, collagen XVIII), nucleophilin, α-latrotoxin, unidentified ligand in developing muscleNot reportedLigand binding requires PTP dimerization[69,70,137–139]
RPTPκR2BHomophilic bindingNot reported [181]
RPTPμR2BHomophilic bindingNot reportedStructure of extracellular domain reveals ‘spacer–clamp’ mechanism in cell–cell adhesions; homophilic interactions appear to trigger RPTPμ signaling in retial neurites[83,182–184]
RPTPλR2BHomophilic bindingNot reported [185]
DEP1R3Components in MatrigelActivationMolecular identity of ligand(s) not known[186]
RPTPβ/ζR5PleiotrophinInhibitionMay be linked to activation of several pathways; whether inhibition occurs by induction of dimer formation is not known[133,134,136]
TenascinNot reported [187]
ContactinNot reported [188]
TAG-1/Axonin-1Not reported [189]

RPTPσ also has multiple binding partners, which have been identified in the nervous system and skeletal muscles, including nucleolin, alpha-latrotoxin and the heparan-sulfate proteoglycans agrin and collagen XVIII [137–139]. Characterization of the RPTPσ interactions with these proteins demonstrates that they display a dependency of the dimerization state of RPTPσ and that splice variants of RPTPσ differ with regard to their binding specificities [69,70,139]. The effects of these interactions on the activity of RPTPσ remain to be elucidated.

Some of the most exciting findings showing biologically significant PTP–ligand interactions come from recent studies of the role of PTP-LAR during synaptic development in Drosophila. A combination of genetic studies, tissue culture analyses and biochemical experiments led to a model where RPTP-LAR-mediated development of the neuromuscular junction is controlled by two heparan-sulfate proteoglycans; syndecan and dallylike [140,141]. At the neuromuscular junction, RPTP-LAR is expressed in the pre-synaptic neuronal part, whereas the ligands are expressed on the muscle cells. A key substrate for RPTP-LAR in this process is the phospho-protein Enabled (Ena). Syndecan and dallylike both bind RPTP-LAR with high affinity but exert agonistic and antagonistic effects, respectively, on the process of synaptic development. Dallylike controls the activity of RPTP-LAR because downregulation of dallylike increases Ena phosphorylation.

The crystal structure of the homophilic dimer of two RPTPμ ectodomains provides new insight into the structural and mechanistic basis for earlier observations on the cell-adhesive homophilic RPTPμ interactions [83]. In the dimer, the two subunits occur as two antiparallel rigid structures. The dimer structure is maintained through interactions between the MAM and Ig domains of one molecule and the FN1 and FN2 domains of the other. Interestingly, the length of the dimeric complex (∼330 Å) is very similar to the width of the extracellular space in the adherens junction. This finding suggests that homophilic interactions between RPTPμ molecules of juxtaposed cells will preferentially occur at adherens junction, and thereby restrict localization of this enzyme to its substrates in cadherin complexes. Furthermore, changes in the width of the intracellular space following expression of different RPTPμ deletion mutants indicate that this rigid interaction has the capacity to directly control the distance between cells. Finally, this structure suggests that many of the previously reported colon-cancer-associated mutations in the related RPTPρ [142] led to proteins that are either misfolded or defective in homophilic interactions.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Dimerization is a well-known regulatory mechanism of transmembrane proteins, including type I transmembrane proteins with a single transmembrane domain [143]. The first evidence that RPTPs are regulated by dimerization was provided by chimeric proteins consisting of the cytoplasmic domain of the RPTP, CD45, and the extracellular domain of the EGFR [144]. This chimera rescues the T-cell response in cells lacking CD45, indicating that the construct is functional. EGF treatment leads to dimerization of the chimera and functionally inactivates the chimera, in that the T-cell response is impaired after EGF treatment. The crystal structure of the membrane-proximal domain of RPTPα provided evidence for dimerization-induced inactivation of RPTPs [98]. Dimers were observed in these crystals with a large buried surface at the interface of the two molecules. A helix–loop–helix, wedge-like structure of one of the molecules inserted into the catalytic cleft of the other and vice versa, thereby occluding access for substrates to the catalytic site and inactivating PTP. Mutation of the wedge in the EGFR–CD45 chimera abolishes EGF-induced functional inactivation of the chimera, indicating that the wedge has an important role in the dimerization-induced inactivation of RPTPs [145]. Introduction of a cysteine residue into the extracellular juxtamembrane domain of RPTPα leads to constitutive dimerization. Depending on the exact location of the cysteine residue, these dimers are active or inactive [146]. Mutation of the wedge in the inactive mutant leads to activation of PTP activity, demonstrating the importance of the wedge in dimerization-induced inactivation of RPTPs. Moreover, peptides encompassing the wedge of LAR or RPTPμ bind these RPTPs in a homophilic manner and administration of these peptides to cells results in specific defects that are consistent with the inhibition of RPTP function [147]. Although the wedge is conserved among RPTPs and functional experiments suggest that it has an important role in dimerization-induced inactivation, the model of wedge-mediated RPTP inactivation is the subject of debate because the crystal structures of full-length LAR and full-length CD45 are not compatible with this role for the wedge [148,149]. The membrane-distal PTP domain causes a steric clash when the wedge of one monomer is modeled into the catalytic site of the other, as observed in RPTPα. However, if one assumes that there is flexibility between D1 and D2, a wedge–catalytic site interaction is feasible in CD45 and LAR. Flexibility between D1s and D2s may be regulated dynamically, thus controlling the formation of inactive RPTP dimers.

The functional data show that RPTPs can be regulated by dimerization. But do RPTPs dimerize? There is ample evidence that RPTPs dimerize in living cells. Chemical cross-linkers show dimerization of CD45, RPTPα, Sap-1 and RPTPσ [70,150–153]. RPTPα homodimerizes in living cells, as demonstrated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer between chimeras of RPTPα proteins fused to derivatives of green fluorescent protein [154]. Chin et al. [155] showed that dimerization of many RPTPs may be driven by their transmembrane domain. PTP domains may also be involved in homo- and heterodimerization [151,156,157]. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments have been used to demonstrate dimerization of full-length RPTPα [150], CD45 [158] and RPTPε [159].

Although dimerization was first shown to inactivate RPTPs, it is now evident that both active and inactive RPTP dimers exist. The exact make-up of the dimers determines the catalytic activity of the RPTPs. RPTPα mutants with disulfide bonds at different positions in the extracellular juxtamembrane domain suggest that subtle changes in the relative orientation of the RPTPs determines whether they are active or inactive and actually provides an appealing model for regulation. Changes in the experimental conditions lead to subtle changes in the quaternary structure of RPTPα, as demonstrated using an epitope tag in the extracellular domain of RPTPα [160]. Rotational coupling within RPTPs may therefore be an important regulatory mechanism (Fig. 4). As described above, Lee et al. [70] demonstrated that only dimeric ectodomains of RPTPσ bind ligand and that subtle changes in the rotational coupling of the ectodomains abolished ligand binding. These results provide support for the model that intracellular changes, such as phosphorylation or oxidation, result in changes in the quaternary conformation within RPTP dimers, thus altering the ligand-binding properties. Therefore, RPTPs may not only have the capacity for outside-in signaling, i.e. to bind ligands extracellularly resulting in changes in catalytic activity intracellularly, but also for inside-out signaling, i.e. to alter the ligand binding repertoire in response to intracellular changes.


Figure 4.  Rotational coupling regulates RPTP dimers. RPTPs dimerize constitutively. Whether RPTP dimers are active depends on the exact make-up of the dimers. Post-translational modifications, such as oxidation or phosphorylation may shift the dimers from an active to an inactive state or vice versa by inducing subtle changes in rotational coupling. The dimeric states may be stabilized by different ligands binding to either form of the extracellular dimer. Ligand binding may therefore drive the equilibrium of dimers into one of the forms, representing classical outside-in signaling. Alternatively, intracellular post-translational modifications may change the exposed surface of the extracellular domain, resulting in binding of different ligands, which represents inside-out signaling.

Download figure to PowerPoint


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

Control of PTP expression levels remains surprisingly poorly characterized. Improved understanding of transcriptional and translational control is likely to reveal novel processes governed by PTPs. It should also be noted that the involvement of microRNAs in controlling PTP expression remains to be explored.

Recent discoveries of regulatory ligands for Drosophila RPTP-LAR should encourage the continued search for additional PTP ligands. It will be interesting to follow-up on the concept of inside-out signaling and to further analyze how oxidation and dimerization affect ligand binding. The structural understanding of the RPTPμ homophilic interactions will assist in studies on whether this type of binding affects the specific activity of RPTPs involved in cell-adhesive interactions.

To date, studies on post-translational PTP modifications have focused on reversible oxidation of the active site and phosphorylation. However, other types of modifications are also involved in controlling PTPs. PTP1B is sumoylated in a manner that inhibits its catalytic activity [161]. It will be interesting to see if other PTPs are regulated by sumoylation. Likewise, ubiquitination may regulate the stability and activity of PTPs, warranting further investigation.

Further studies on the regulation of PTPs by oxidation will continue to give new insights into fundamental cell processes. One key topic where progress can be expected is the source of ROS involved in PTP regulation. Analyses of whether spatially restricted ROS production is a common mechanism for conferring specificity are also awaited. Furthermore, it is likely that the description of how PrxII modulates RTK signaling by controlling PTP oxidation, will be followed by more studies on how reductases and ROS scavengers control PTP oxidation. Concerning the latter issue, it should be noted that modulation of glutaredoxin has been shown to affect PDGF receptor signaling through effects on the oxidation of LMW-PTP [162].

The refined understanding of PTP regulation suggests novel approaches for the design of PTP agonists and antagonists. Obviously, the identification of extracellular homo- and heterophilic ligands suggests the development of neutralizing ligand-targeted antibodies. The effects of dimerization on RPTP activity suggest the possibility of designing agents that stabilize or disrupt the dimeric state. The recent demonstration of a DEP-1-modulating antibody, which required bivalency to exert its action [163], provides an example of this approach. Finally, it may be possible to exploit the reversible oxidation of PTPs for therapeutic purposes, as indicated by early studies with non-specific antioxidants [131]. It has also been speculated that modifiers that stabilize the inhibited oxidized conformation of the active site could be designed. Hopefully, continued collaborative studies will thus be able to combine the knowledge derived from basic biology studies on PTPs, with analyses of the molecular etiology of human diseases, into novel translational initiatives.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References

This study was supported by European Research Community Funds (HPRN-CT-2000-00085 and MRTN-CT-2006-035830). JdH was supported by the Netherlands Proteomics Centre (NPC) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), AÖ by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Cancer Society, and FDB by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB604, TPA1; BO1043/6-2).


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Expression
  4. Subcellular localization
  5. Alternative splicing and limited proteolysis
  6. Post-translational modification: phosphorylation
  7. Post-translational modification: oxidation
  8. Ligands
  9. Dimerization
  10. Outlook
  11. Acknowledgements
  12. References
  • 1
    Alonso A, Sasin J, Bottini N, Friedberg I, Friedberg I, Osterman A, Godzik A, Hunter T, Dixon J & Mustelin T (2004) Protein tyrosine phosphatases in the human genome. Cell 117, 699711.
  • 2
    Andersen JN, Jansen PG, Echwald SM, Mortensen OH, Fukada T, Del Vecchio R, Tonks NK & Moller NP (2004) A genomic perspective on protein tyrosine phosphatases: gene structure, pseudogenes, and genetic disease linkage. FASEB J 18, 830.
  • 3
    Neel BG, Gu H & Pao L (2003) The ‘Shp’ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 28, 284293.
  • 4
    Pao LI, Badour K, Siminovitch KA & Neel BG (2007) Nonreceptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases in immune cell signaling. Annu Rev Immunol 25, 473523.
  • 5
    Schaapveld R, Wieringa B & Hendriks W (1997) Receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatases: alike and yet so different. Mol Biol Rep 24, 247262.
  • 6
    Kappert K, Peters KG, Böhmer FD & Östman A (2005) Tyrosine phosphatases in vessel wall signaling. Cardiovasc Res 65, 587598.
  • 7
    Kume T, Tsuneizumi K, Watanabe T, Thomas ML & Oishi M (1994) Induction of specific protein tyrosine phosphatase transcripts during differentiation of mouse erythroleukemia cells. J Biol Chem 269, 47094712.
  • 8
    Longo FM, Martignetti JA, Le Beau JM, Zhang JS, Barnes JP & Brosius J (1993) Leukocyte common antigen-related receptor-linked tyrosine phosphatase. Regulation of mRNA expression. J Biol Chem 268, 2650326511.
  • 9
    Ogata M, Sawada M, Kosugi A & Hamaoka T (1994) Developmentally regulated expression of a murine receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase in the thymus. J Immunol 153, 44784487.
  • 10
    Taniguchi Y, London R, Schinkmann K, Jiang S & Avraham H (1999) The receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase, PTP-RO, is upregulated during megakaryocyte differentiation and Is associated with the c-Kit receptor. Blood 94, 539549.
  • 11
    Walton KM, Martell KJ, Kwak SP, Dixon JE & Largent BL (1993) A novel receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase is expressed during neurogenesis in the olfactory neuroepithelium. Neuron 11, 387400.
  • 12
    Östman A, Yang Q & Tonks NK (1994) Expression of DEP-1, a receptor-like protein-tyrosine-phosphatase, is enhanced with increasing cell density. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 96809684.
  • 13
    Campan M, Yoshizumi M, Seidah NG, Lee ME, Bianchi C & Haber E (1996) Increased proteolytic processing of protein tyrosine phosphatase mu in confluent vascular endothelial cells: the role of PC5, a member of the subtilisin family. Biochemistry 35, 37973802.
  • 14
    Fuchs M, Muller T, Lerch MM & Ullrich A (1996) Association of human protein-tyrosine phosphatase kappa with members of the armadillo family. J Biol Chem 271, 1671216719.
  • 15
    Gaits F, Li RY, Ragab A, Ragab-Thomas JM & Chap H (1995) Increase in receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase activity and expression level on density-dependent growth arrest of endothelial cells. Biochem J 311, 97103.
  • 16
    Kappert K, Paulsson J, Sparwel J, Leppanen O, Hellberg C, Östman A & Micke P (2007) Dynamic changes in the expression of DEP-1 and other PDGF receptor-antagonizing PTPs during onset and termination of neointima formation. FASEB J 21, 523534.
  • 17
    Östman A, Hellberg C & Böhmer FD (2006) Protein-tyrosine phosphatases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6, 307320.
  • 18
    Fukada T & Tonks NK (2001) The reciprocal role of Egr-1 and Sp family proteins in regulation of the PTP1B promoter in response to the p210 Bcr-Abl oncoprotein-tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 276, 2551225519.
  • 19
    Fukada T & Tonks NK (2003) Identification of YB-1 as a regulator of PTP1B expression: implications for regulation of insulin and cytokine signaling. EMBO J 22, 479493.
  • 20
    Wang SE, Wu FY, Shin I, Qu S & Arteaga CL (2005) Transforming growth factor {beta} (TGF-{beta})-Smad target gene protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type kappa is required for TGF-{beta} function. Mol Cell Biol 25, 47034715.
  • 21
    Banville D, Stocco R & Shen SH (1995) Human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1C (PTPN6) gene structure: alternate promoter usage and exon skipping generate multiple transcripts. Genomics 27, 165173.
  • 22
    Elson A & Leder P (1995) Identification of a cytoplasmic, phorbol ester-inducible isoform of protein tyrosine phosphatase epsilon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 1223512239.
  • 23
    Chirivi RG, Dilaver G, van de Vorstenbosch R, Wanschers B, Schepens J, Croes H, Fransen J & Hendriks W (2004) Characterization of multiple transcripts and isoforms derived from the mouse protein tyrosine phosphatase gene Ptprr. Genes Cells 9, 919933.
  • 24
    Rajendrakumar GV, Radha V & Swarup G (1993) Stabilization of a protein-tyrosine phosphatase mRNA upon mitogenic stimulation of T lymphocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1216, 205212.
  • 25
    Siewert E, Muller-Esterl W, Starr R, Heinrich PC & Schaper F (1999) Different protein turnover of interleukin-6-type cytokine signalling components. Eur J Biochem 265, 251257.
  • 26
    Dilaver G, van de Vorstenbosch R, Tarrega C, Rios P, Pulido R, van Aerde K, Fransen J & Hendriks W (2007) Proteolytic processing of the receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPBR7. FEBS J 274, 96108.
  • 27
    Gebbink MF, Zondag GC, Koningstein GM, Feiken E, Wubbolts RW & Moolenaar WH (1995) Cell surface expression of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase RPTP mu is regulated by cell-cell contact. J Cell Biol 131, 251260.
  • 28
    Mauro LJ & Dixon JE (1994) ‘Zip codes’ direct intracellular protein tyrosine phosphatases to the correct cellular ‘address’. Trends Biochem Sci 19, 151155.
  • 29
    Tonks NK (2006) Protein tyrosine phosphatases: from genes, to function, to disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 833846.
  • 30
    Östman A & Böhmer FD (2001) Regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling by protein tyrosine phosphatases. Trends Cell Biol 11, 258266.
  • 31
    Burridge K, Sastry SK & Sallee JL (2006) Regulation of cell adhesion by protein-tyrosine phosphatases. I. Cell–matrix adhesion. J Biol Chem 281, 1559315596.
  • 32
    Sallee JL, Wittchen ES & Burridge K (2006) Regulation of cell adhesion by protein-tyrosine phosphatases: II. Cell–cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 281, 1618916192.
  • 33
    Machide M, Hashigasako A, Matsumoto K & Nakamura T (2006) Contact inhibition of hepatocyte growth regulated by functional association of the c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor and LAR protein-tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 281, 87658772.
  • 34
    Yang T, Massa SM & Longo FM (2006) LAR protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor associates with TrkB and modulates neurotrophic signaling pathways. J Neurobiol 66, 14201436.
  • 35
    Imhof D, Wavreille AS, May A, Zacharias M, Tridandapani S & Pei D (2006) Sequence specificity of SHP-1 and SHP-2 Src homology 2 domains. Critical roles of residues beyond the pY+3 position. J Biol Chem 281, 2027120282.
  • 36
    Frank C, Keilhack H, Opitz F, Zschornig O & Böhmer FD (1999) Binding of phosphatidic acid to the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 as a basis for activity modulation. Biochemistry 38, 1199312002.
  • 37
    Sankarshanan M, Ma Z, Iype T & Lorenz U (2007) Identification of a novel lipid raft-targeting motif in Src homology 2-containing phosphatase 1. J Immunol 179, 483490.
  • 38
    Nika K, Charvet C, Williams S, Tautz L, Bruckner S, Rahmouni S, Bottini N, Schoenberger SP, Baier G, Altman A et al. (2006) Lipid raft targeting of hematopoietic protein tyrosine phosphatase by protein kinase C theta-mediated phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 26, 18061816.
  • 39
    Tonks NK (2003) PTP1B: from the sidelines to the front lines! FEBS Lett 546, 140148.
  • 40
    Salmeen A, Andersen JN, Myers MP, Tonks NK & Barford D (2000) Molecular basis for the dephosphorylation of the activation segment of the insulin receptor by protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Mol Cell 6, 14011412.
  • 41
    Teichmann K, Winkler R, Hampel K, Trumpler A, Böhmer FD & Imhof D (2007) Monitoring phosphatase reactions of multiple phosphorylated substrates by reversed-phase HPLC. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 853, 204213.
  • 42
    Li S, Depetris RS, Barford D, Chernoff J & Hubbard SR (2005) Crystal structure of a complex between protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase. Structure 13, 16431651.
  • 43
    Choi JH, Kim HS, Kim SH, Yang YR, Bae YS, Chang JS, Kwon HM, Ryu SH & Suh PG (2006) Phospholipase Cgamma1 negatively regulates growth hormone signalling by forming a ternary complex with Jak2 and protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. Nat Cell Biol 8, 13891397.
  • 44
    Yudushkin IA, Schleifenbaum A, Kinkhabwala A, Neel BG, Schultz C & Bastiaens PI (2007) Live-cell imaging of enzyme-substrate interaction reveals spatial regulation of PTP1B. Science 315, 115119.
  • 45
    Haj FG, Verveer PJ, Squire A, Neel BG & Bastiaens PI (2002) Imaging sites of receptor dephosphorylation by PTP1B on the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 295, 17081711.
  • 46
    Hernandez MV, Sala MG, Balsamo J, Lilien J & Arregui CO (2006) ER-bound PTP1B is targeted to newly forming cell–matrix adhesions. J Cell Sci 119, 12331243.
  • 47
    Gu F, Nguyen DT, Stuible M, Dube N, Tremblay ML & Chevet E (2004) Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B potentiates IRE1 signaling during endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 279, 4968949693.
  • 48
    Lammers R, Bossenmaier B, Cool DE, Tonks NK, Schlessinger J, Fischer EH & Ullrich A (1993) Differential activities of protein tyrosine phosphatases in intact cells. J Biol Chem 268, 2245622462.
  • 49
    Tiganis T, Bennett AM, Ravichandran KS & Tonks NK (1998) Epidermal growth factor receptor and the adaptor protein p52Shc are specific substrates of T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase. Mol Cell Biol 18, 16221634.
  • 50
    Schmidt-Arras DE, Böhmer A, Markova B, Choudhary C, Serve H & Böhmer FD (2005) Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates maturation of receptor tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell Biol 25, 36903703.
  • 51
    Bonaventure J, Horne WC & Baron R (2007) The localization of FGFR3 mutations causing thanatophoric dysplasia type I differentially affects phosphorylation, processing and ubiquitylation of the receptor. FEBS J 274, 30783093.
  • 52
    Lievens PM, Roncador A & Liboi E (2006) K644E/M FGFR3 mutants activate Erk1/2 from the endoplasmic reticulum through FRS2 alpha and PLC gamma-independent pathways. J Mol Biol 357, 783792.
  • 53
    Karlsson S, Kowanetz K, Sandin A, Persson C, Östman A, Heldin CH & Hellberg C (2006) Loss of T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase induces recycling of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) beta-receptor but not the PDGF alpha-receptor. Mol Biol Cell 17, 48464855.
  • 54
    Huynh H, Bottini N, Williams S, Cherepanov V, Musumeci L, Saito K, Bruckner S, Vachon E, Wang X, Kruger J et al. (2004) Control of vesicle fusion by a tyrosine phosphatase. Nat Cell Biol 6, 831839.
  • 55
    Saito K, Williams S, Bulankina A, Honing S & Mustelin T (2007) Association of protein-tyrosine phosphatase MEG2 via its Sec14p homology domain with vesicle-trafficking proteins. J Biol Chem 282, 1517015178.
  • 56
    Pulido R, Zuniga A & Ullrich A (1998) PTP-SL and STEP protein tyrosine phosphatases regulate the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases ERK1 and ERK2 by association through a kinase interaction motif. EMBO J 17, 73377350.
  • 57
    Saxena M, Williams S, Tasken K & Mustelin T (1999) Crosstalk between cAMP-dependent kinase and MAP kinase through a protein tyrosine phosphatase. Nat Cell Biol 1, 305311.
  • 58
    Schindler C, Levy DE & Decker T (2007) JAK-STAT signaling: from interferons to cytokines. J Biol Chem 282, 2005920063.
  • 59
    Ibarra-Sanchez MJ, Simoncic PD, Nestel FR, Duplay P, Lapp WS & Tremblay ML (2000) The T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase. Semin Immunol 12, 379386.
  • 60
    ten Hoeve J, De JI, Fu Y, Zhu W, Tremblay M, David M & Shuai K (2002) Identification of a nuclear Stat1 protein tyrosine phosphatase. Mol Cell Biol 22, 56625668.
  • 61
    Yamamoto T, Sekine Y, Kashima K, Kubota A, Sato N, Aoki N & Matsuda T (2002) The nuclear isoform of protein-tyrosine phosphatase TC-PTP regulates interleukin-6-mediated signaling pathway through STAT3 dephosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297, 811817.
  • 62
    Poole AW & Jones ML (2005) A SHPing tale: perspectives on the regulation of SHP-1 and SHP-2 tyrosine phosphatases by the C-terminal tail. Cell Signal 17, 13231332.
  • 63
    Yu CL, Jin YJ & Burakoff SJ (2000) Cytosolic tyrosine dephosphorylation of STAT5. Potential role of SHP-2 in STAT5 regulation. J Biol Chem 275, 599604.
  • 64
    Zhang X, Guo A, Yu J, Possemato A, Chen Y, Zheng W, Polakiewicz RD, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE et al. (2007) Identification of STAT3 as a substrate of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase T. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 40604064.
  • 65
    O’Grady P, Krueger NX, Streuli M & Saito H (1994) Genomic organization of the human LAR protein tyrosine phosphatase gene and alternative splicing in the extracellular fibronectin type-III domains. J Biol Chem 269, 2519325199.
  • 66
    Peles E, Schlessinger J & Grumet M (1998) Multi-ligand interactions with receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase beta: implications for intercellular signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 23, 121124.
  • 67
    Pulido R, Serra-Pages C, Tang M & Streuli M (1995) The LAR/PTP delta/PTP sigma subfamily of transmembrane protein-tyrosine-phosphatases: multiple human LAR, PTP delta, and PTP sigma isoforms are expressed in a tissue-specific manner and associate with the LAR-interacting protein LIP.1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 1168611690.
  • 68
    Zhang JS & Longo FM (1995) LAR tyrosine phosphatase receptor: alternative splicing is preferential to the nervous system, coordinated with cell growth and generates novel isoforms containing extensive CAG repeats. J Cell Biol 128, 415431.
  • 69
    Sajnani-Perez G, Chilton JK, Aricescu AR, Haj F & Stoker AW (2003) Isoform-specific binding of the tyrosine phosphatase PTPsigma to a ligand in developing muscle. Mol Cell Neurosci 22, 3748.
  • 70
    Lee S, Faux C, Nixon J, Alete D, Chilton J, Hawadle M & Stoker AW (2007) Dimerization of protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma governs both ligand binding and isoform specificity. Mol Cell Biol 27, 17951808.
  • 71
    Tabiti K, Cui L, Chhatwal VJ, Moochhala S, Ngoi SS & Pallen CJ (1996) Novel alternative splicing predicts a secreted extracellular isoform of the human receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR. Gene 175, 713.
  • 72
    Yang T, Yin W, Derevyanny VD, Moore LA & Longo FM (2005) Identification of an ectodomain within the LAR protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor that binds homophilically and activates signalling pathways promoting neurite outgrowth. Eur J Neurosci 22, 21592170.
  • 73
    Jin YJ, Yu CL & Burakoff SJ (1999) Human 70-kDa SHP-1L differs from 68-kDa SHP-1 in its C-terminal structure and catalytic activity. J Biol Chem 274, 2830128307.
  • 74
    Kachel N, Erdmann KS, Kremer W, Wolff P, Gronwald W, Heumann R & Kalbitzer HR (2003) Structure determination and ligand interactions of the PDZ2b domain of PTP-Bas (hPTP1E): splicing-induced modulation of ligand specificity. J Mol Biol 334, 143155.
  • 75
    Mei L, Doherty CA & Huganir RL (1994) RNA splicing regulates the activity of a SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 269, 1225412262.
  • 76
    Kapp K, Siemens J, Weyrich P, Schulz JB, Haring HU & Lammers R (2007) Extracellular domain splice variants of a transforming protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha mutant differentially activate Src-kinase dependent focus formation. Genes Cells 12, 6373.
  • 77
    Shifrin VI & Neel BG (1993) Growth factor-inducible alternative splicing of nontransmembrane phosphotyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B pre-mRNA. J Biol Chem 268, 2537625384.
  • 78
    Jiang YP, Wang H, D’Eustachio P, Musacchio JM, Schlessinger J & Sap J (1993) Cloning and characterization of R-PTP-kappa, a new member of the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase family with a proteolytically cleaved cellular adhesion molecule-like extracellular region. Mol Cell Biol 13, 29422951.
  • 79
    Streuli M, Krueger NX, Ariniello PD, Tang M, Munro JM, Blattler WA, Adler DA, Disteche CM & Saito H (1992) Expression of the receptor-linked protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR: proteolytic cleavage and shedding of the CAM-like extracellular region. EMBO J 11, 897907.
  • 80
    Aicher B, Lerch MM, Muller T, Schilling J & Ullrich A (1997) Cellular redistribution of protein tyrosine phosphatases LAR and PTPsigma by inducible proteolytic processing. J Cell Biol 138, 681696.
  • 81
    Serra-Pages C, Saito H & Streuli M (1994) Mutational analysis of proprotein processing, subunit association, and shedding of the LAR transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 269, 2363223641.
  • 82
    Anders L, Mertins P, Lammich S, Murgia M, Hartmann D, Saftig P, Haass C & Ullrich A (2006) Furin-, ADAM 10-, and gamma-secretase-mediated cleavage of a receptor tyrosine phosphatase and regulation of beta-catenin’s transcriptional activity. Mol Cell Biol 26, 39173934.
  • 83
    Aricescu AR, Siebold C, Choudhuri K, Chang VT, Lu W, Davis SJ, van der Merwe PA & Jones EY (2007) Structure of a tyrosine phosphatase adhesive interaction reveals a spacer–clamp mechanism. Science 317, 12171220.
  • 84
    Halle M, Liu YC, Hardy S, Theberge JF, Blanchetot C, Bourdeau A, Meng TC & Tremblay ML (2007) Caspase-3 regulates catalytic activity and scaffolding functions of the protein tyrosine phosphatase PEST, a novel modulator of the apoptotic response. Mol Cell Biol 27, 11721190.
  • 85
    Falet H, Pain S & Rendu F (1998) Tyrosine unphosphorylated platelet SHP-1 is a substrate for calpain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 252, 5155.
  • 86
    Frangioni JV, Oda A, Smith M, Salzman EW & Neel BG (1993) Calpain-catalyzed cleavage and subcellular relocation of protein phosphotyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP-1B) in human platelets. EMBO J 12, 48434856.
  • 87
    Gu M & Majerus PW (1996) The properties of the protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPMEG. J Biol Chem 271, 2775127759.
  • 88
    Schoenwaelder SM, Kulkarni S, Salem HH, Imajoh-Ohmi S, Yamao-Harigaya W, Saido TC & Jackson SP (1997) Distinct substrate specificities and functional roles for the 78- and 76-kDa forms of mu-calpain in human platelets. J Biol Chem 272, 2487624884.
  • 89
    Kuchay SM, Kim N, Grunz EA, Fay WP & Chishti AH (2007) Double knockouts reveal that protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B is a physiological target of calpain-1 in platelets. Mol Cell Biol 27, 60386052.
  • 90
    Gulati P, Markova B, Gottlicher M, Böhmer FD & Herrlich PA (2004) UVA inactivates protein tyrosine phosphatases by calpain-mediated degradation. EMBO Rep 5, 812817.
  • 91
    Brautigan DL & Pinault FM (1993) Serine phosphorylation of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP1B) in HeLa cells in response to analogues of cAMP or diacylglycerol plus okadaic acid. Mol Cell Biochem 127–128, 121129.
  • 92
    Flint AJ, Gebbink MF, Franza BR Jr, Hill DE & Tonks NK (1993) Multi-site phosphorylation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase, PTP1B: identification of cell cycle regulated and phorbol ester stimulated sites of phosphorylation. EMBO J 12, 19371946.
  • 93
    Garton AJ & Tonks NK (1994) PTP-PEST: a protein tyrosine phosphatase regulated by serine phosphorylation. EMBO J 13, 37633771.
  • 94
    Ostergaard HL & Trowbridge IS (1991) Negative regulation of CD45 protein tyrosine phosphatase activity by ionomycin in T cells. Science 253, 14231425.
  • 95
    Yamada A, Streuli M, Saito H, Rothstein DM, Schlossman SF & Morimoto C (1990) Effect of activation of protein kinase C on CD45 isoform expression and CD45 protein tyrosine phosphatase activity in T cells. Eur J Immunol 20, 16551660.
  • 96
    Tracy S, van der Geer P & Hunter T (1995) The receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase, RPTP alpha, is phosphorylated by protein kinase C on two serines close to the inner face of the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem 270, 1058710594.
  • 97
    den Hertog J, Sap J, Pals CE, Schlessinger J & Kruijer W (1995) Stimulation of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha activity and phosphorylation by phorbol ester. Cell Growth Differ 6, 303307.
  • 98
    Bilwes AM, den Hertog J, Hunter T & Noel JP (1996) Structural basis for inhibition of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase-alpha by dimerization. Nature 382, 555559.
  • 99
    Zheng XM, Resnick RJ & Shalloway D (2000) A phosphotyrosine displacement mechanism for activation of Src by PTPalpha. EMBO J 19, 964978.
  • 100
    Zheng XM & Shalloway D (2001) Two mechanisms activate PTPalpha during mitosis. EMBO J 20, 60376049.
  • 101
    Zheng XM, Resnick RJ & Shalloway D (2002) Mitotic activation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha and regulation of its Src-mediated transforming activity by its sites of protein kinase C phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 277, 2192221929.
  • 102
    Schievella AR, Paige LA, Johnson KA, Hill DE & Erikson RL (1993) Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B undergoes mitosis-specific phosphorylation on serine. Cell Growth Differ 4, 239246.
  • 103
    Strack V, Krutzfeldt J, Kellerer M, Ullrich A, Lammers R & Haring HU (2002) The protein-tyrosine-phosphatase SHP2 is phosphorylated on serine residues 576 and 591 by protein kinase C isoforms alpha, beta1, beta2, and eta. Biochemistry 41, 603608.
  • 104
    Liu Y, Kruhlak MJ, Hao JJ & Shaw S (2007) Rapid T cell receptor-mediated SHP-1 S591 phosphorylation regulates SHP-1 cellular localization and phosphatase activity. J Leukoc Biol 82, 742751.
  • 105
    Autero M, Saharinen J, Pessa-Morikawa T, Soula-Rothhut M, Oetken C, Gassmann M, Bergman M, Alitalo K, Burn P & Gahmberg CG (1994) Tyrosine phosphorylation of CD45 phosphotyrosine phosphatase by p50csk kinase creates a binding site for p56lck tyrosine kinase and activates the phosphatase. Mol Cell Biol 14, 13081321.
  • 106
    Stover DR, Charbonneau H, Tonks NK & Walsh KA (1991) Protein-tyrosine-phosphatase CD45 is phosphorylated transiently on tyrosine upon activation of Jurkat T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 77047707.
  • 107
    Feng GS, Hui CC & Pawson T (1993) SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase as a target of protein-tyrosine kinases. Science 259, 16071611.
  • 108
    Vogel W, Lammers R, Huang J & Ullrich A (1993) Activation of a phosphotyrosine phosphatase by tyrosine phosphorylation. Science 259, 16111614.
  • 109
    Bennett AM, Tang TL, Sugimoto S, Walsh CT & Neel BG (1994) Protein-tyrosine-phosphatase SHPTP2 couples platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta to Ras. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 73357339.
  • 110
    Li RY, Gaits F, Ragab A, Ragab-Thomas JM & Chap H (1995) Tyrosine phosphorylation of an SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase is coupled to platelet thrombin receptor via a pertussis toxin-sensitive heterotrimeric G-protein. EMBO J 14, 25192526.
  • 111
    Lu W, Gong D, Bar-Sagi D & Cole PA (2001) Site-specific incorporation of a phosphotyrosine mimetic reveals a role for tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 in cell signaling. Mol Cell 8, 759769.
  • 112
    Zhang Z, Shen K, Lu W & Cole PA (2003) The role of C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of SHP-1 explored via expressed protein ligation. J Biol Chem 278, 46684674.
  • 113
    den Hertog J, Tracy S & Hunter T (1994) Phosphorylation of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha on Tyr789, a binding site for the SH3-SH2-SH3 adaptor protein GRB-2 in vivo. EMBO J 13, 30203032.
  • 114
    Su J, Batzer A & Sap J (1994) Receptor tyrosine phosphatase R-PTP-alpha is tyrosine-phosphorylated and associated with the adaptor protein Grb2. J Biol Chem 269, 1873118734.
  • 115
    Maksumova L, Wang Y, Wong NK, Le HT, Pallen CJ & Johnson P (2007) Differential function of PTPalpha and PTPalpha Y789F in T cells and regulation of PTPalpha phosphorylation at Tyr-89 by CD45. J Biol Chem 282, 2092520932.
  • 116
    Rhee SG (2006) Cell signaling. H2O2, a necessary evil for cell signaling. Science 312, 18821883.
  • 117
    Salmeen A & Barford D (2005) Functions and mechanisms of redox regulation of cysteine-based phosphatases. Antioxid Redox Signal 7, 560577.
  • 118
    Salmeen A, Andersen JN, Myers MP, Meng TC, Hinks JA, Tonks NK & Barford D (2003) Redox regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B involves a sulphenyl-amide intermediate. Nature 423, 769773.
  • 119
    van Montfort RL, Congreve M, Tisi D, Carr R & Jhoti H (2003) Oxidation state of the active-site cysteine in protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. Nature 423, 773777.
  • 120
    Yang J, Groen A, Lemeer S, Jans A, Slijper M, Roe SM, den Hertog J & Barford D (2007) Reversible oxidation of the membrane distal domain of receptor PTPalpha is mediated by a cyclic sulfenamide. Biochemistry 46, 709719.
  • 121
    Barrett DM, Black SM, Todor H, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Dawson KS & Mikkelsen RB (2005) Inhibition of protein-tyrosine phosphatases by mild oxidative stresses is dependent on S-nitrosylation. J Biol Chem 280, 1445314461.
  • 122
    Barrett WC, DeGnore JP, Keng YF, Zhang ZY, Yim MB & Chock PB (1999) Roles of superoxide radical anion in signal transduction mediated by reversible regulation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B. J Biol Chem 274, 3454334546.
  • 123
    van der Wijk T, Overvoorde J & den Hertog J (2004) H2O2-induced intermolecular disulfide bond formation between receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases. J Biol Chem 279, 4435544361.
  • 124
    Persson C, Sjoblom T, Groen A, Kappert K, Engstrom U, Hellman U, Heldin CH, den Hertog J & Östman A (2004) Preferential oxidation of the second phosphatase domain of receptor-like PTP-alpha revealed by an antibody against oxidized protein tyrosine phosphatases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 18861891.
  • 125
    Groen A, Lemeer S, van der WT, Overvoorde J, Heck AJ, Östman A, Barford D, Slijper M & den Hertog J (2005) Differential oxidation of protein-tyrosine phosphatases. J Biol Chem 280, 1029810304.
  • 126
    Ross SH, Lindsay Y, Safrany ST, Lorenzo O, Villa F, Toth R, Clague MJ, Downes CP & Leslie NR (2007) Differential redox regulation within the PTP superfamily. Cell Signal 19, 15211530.
  • 127
    Kwon J, Qu CK, Maeng JS, Falahati R, Lee C & Williams MS (2005) Receptor-stimulated oxidation of SHP-2 promotes T-cell adhesion through SLP-76-ADAP. EMBO J 24, 23312341.
  • 128
    Wu RF, Xu YC, Ma Z, Nwariaku FE, Sarosi GA Jr & Terada LS (2005) Subcellular targeting of oxidants during endothelial cell migration. J Cell Biol 171, 893904.
  • 129
    Choi MH, Lee IK, Kim GW, Kim BU, Han YH, Yu DY, Park HS, Kim KY, Lee JS, Choi C et al. (2005) Regulation of PDGF signalling and vascular remodelling by peroxiredoxin II. Nature 435, 347353.
  • 130
    Weibrecht I, Böhmer SA, Dagnell M, Kappert K, Östman A & Böhmer FD (2007) Oxidation sensitivity of the catalytic cysteine of the protein-tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2. Free Radical Biol Med 43, 100110.
  • 131
    Kappert K, Sparwel J, Sandin A, Seiler A, Siebolts U, Leppanen O, Rosenkranz S & Östman A (2006) Antioxidants relieve phosphatase inhibition and reduce PDGF signaling in cultured VSMCs and in restenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26, 26442651.
  • 132
    Fox GC, Shafiq M, Briggs DC, Knowles PP, Collister M, Didmon MJ, Makrantoni V, Dickinson RJ, Hanrahan S, Totty N et al. (2007) Redox-mediated substrate recognition by Sdp1 defines a new group of tyrosine phosphatases. Nature 447, 487492.
  • 133
    Meng K, Rodriguez-Pena A, Dimitrov T, Chen W, Yamin M, Noda M & Deuel TF (2000) Pleiotrophin signals increased tyrosine phosphorylation of beta beta-catenin through inactivation of the intrinsic catalytic activity of the receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase beta/zeta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 26032608.
  • 134
    Pariser H, Perez-Pinera P, Ezquerra L, Herradon G & Deuel TF (2005) Pleiotrophin stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-adducin through inactivation of the transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta/zeta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335, 232239.
  • 135
    Tamura H, Fukada M, Fujikawa A & Noda M (2006) Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z is involved in hippocampus-dependent memory formation through dephosphorylation at Y1105 on p190 RhoGAP. Neurosci Lett 399, 3338.
  • 136
    Perez-Pinera P, Zhang W, Chang Y, Vega JA & Deuel TF (2007) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase is activated through the pleiotrophin/receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase beta/zeta signaling pathway: an alternative mechanism of receptor tyrosine kinase activation. J Biol Chem 282, 2868328690.
  • 137
    Alete DE, Weeks ME, Hovanession AG, Hawadle M & Stoker AW (2006) Cell surface nucleolin on developing muscle is a potential ligand for the axonal receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase-sigma. FEBS J 273, 46684681.
  • 138
    Aricescu AR, McKinnell IW, Halfter W & Stoker AW (2002) Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are ligands for receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma. Mol Cell Biol 22, 18811892.
  • 139
    Krasnoperov V, Bittner MA, Mo W, Buryanovsky L, Neubert TA, Holz RW, Ichtchenko K & Petrenko AG (2002) Protein-tyrosine phosphatase-sigma is a novel member of the functional family of alpha-latrotoxin receptors. J Biol Chem 277, 3588735895.
  • 140
    Fox AN & Zinn K (2005) The heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan is an in vivo ligand for the Drosophila LAR receptor tyrosine phosphatase. Curr Biol 15, 17011711.
  • 141
    Johnson KG, Tenney AP, Ghose A, Duckworth AM, Higashi ME, Parfitt K, Marcu O, Heslip TR, Marsh JL, Schwarz TL et al. (2006) The HSPGs Syndecan and Dallylike bind the receptor phosphatase LAR and exert distinct effects on synaptic development. Neuron 49, 517531.
  • 142
    Wang Z, Shen D, Parsons DW, Bardelli A, Sager J, Szabo S, Ptak J, Silliman N, Peters BA, van der Heijden MS et al. (2004) Mutational analysis of the tyrosine phosphatome in colorectal cancers. Science 304, 11641166.
  • 143
    Lemmon MA & Schlessinger J (1994) Regulation of signal transduction and signal diversity by receptor oligomerization. Trends Biochem Sci 19, 459463.
  • 144
    Desai DM, Sap J, Schlessinger J & Weiss A (1993) Ligand-mediated negative regulation of a chimeric transmembrane receptor tyrosine phosphatase. Cell 73, 541554.
  • 145
    Majeti R, Bilwes AM, Noel JP, Hunter T & Weiss A (1998) Dimerization-induced inhibition of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase function through an inhibitory wedge. Science 279, 8891.
  • 146
    Jiang G, den Hertog J, Su J, Noel J, Sap J & Hunter T (1999) Dimerization inhibits the activity of receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase-alpha. Nature 401, 606610.
  • 147
    Xie Y, Massa SM, Ensslen-Craig SE, Major DL, Yang T, Tisi MA, Derevyanny VD, Runge WO, Mehta BP, Moore LA et al. (2006) Protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) wedge domain peptides: a novel approach for inhibition of PTP function and augmentation of protein-tyrosine kinase function. J Biol Chem 281, 1648216492.
  • 148
    Nam HJ, Poy F, Krueger NX, Saito H & Frederick CA (1999) Crystal structure of the tandem phosphatase domains of RPTP LAR. Cell 97, 449457.
  • 149
    Nam HJ, Poy F, Saito H & Frederick CA (2005) Structural basis for the function and regulation of the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase CD45. J Exp Med 201, 441452.
  • 150
    Blanchetot C, Tertoolen LG & den Hertog J (2002) Regulation of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha by oxidative stress. EMBO J 21, 493503.
  • 151
    Jiang G, den Hertog J & Hunter T (2000) Receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha homodimerizes on the cell surface. Mol Cell Biol 20, 59175929.
  • 152
    Takeda A, Wu JJ & Maizel AL (1992) Evidence for monomeric and dimeric forms of CD45 associated with a 30-kDa phosphorylated protein. J Biol Chem 267, 1665116659.
  • 153
    Walchli S, Espanel X & van Huijsduijnen RH (2005) Sap-1/PTPRH activity is regulated by reversible dimerization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 331, 497502.
  • 154
    Tertoolen LG, Blanchetot C, Jiang G, Overvoorde J, Gadella TW Jr, Hunter T & den Hertog J (2001) Dimerization of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha in living cells. BMC Cell Biol 2, 8.
  • 155
    Chin CN, Sachs JN & Engelman DM (2005) Transmembrane homodimerization of receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatases. FEBS Lett 579, 38553858.
  • 156
    Blanchetot C & den Hertog J (2000) Multiple interactions between receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase (RPTP) alpha and membrane-distal protein-tyrosine phosphatase domains of various RPTPs. J Biol Chem 275, 1244612452.
  • 157
    Blanchetot C, Tertoolen LG, Overvoorde J & den Hertog J (2002) Intra- and intermolecular interactions between intracellular domains of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatases. J Biol Chem 277, 4726347269.
  • 158
    Xu Z & Weiss A (2002) Negative regulation of CD45 by differential homodimerization of the alternatively spliced isoforms. Nat Immunol 3, 764771.
  • 159
    Toledano-Katchalski H, Tiran Z, Sines T, Shani G, Granot-Attas S, den Hertog J & Elson A (2003) Dimerization in vivo and inhibition of the nonreceptor form of protein tyrosine phosphatase epsilon. Mol Cell Biol 23, 54605471.
  • 160
    van der Wijk T, Blanchetot C, Overvoorde J & den Hertog J (2003) Redox-regulated rotational coupling of receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase alpha dimers. J Biol Chem 278, 1396813974.
  • 161
    Dadke S, Cotteret S, Yip SC, Jaffer ZM, Haj F, Ivanov A, Rauscher F III, Shuai K, Ng T, Neel BG et al. (2007) Regulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B by sumoylation. Nat Cell Biol 9, 8085.
  • 162
    Kanda M, Ihara Y, Murata H, Urata Y, Kono T, Yodoi J, Seto S, Yano K & Kondo T (2006) Glutaredoxin modulates platelet-derived growth factor-dependent cell signaling by regulating the redox status of low molecular weight protein-tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 281, 2851828528.
  • 163
    Takahashi T, Takahashi K, Mernaugh RL, Tsuboi N, Liu H & Daniel TO (2006) A monoclonal antibody against CD148, a receptor-like tyrosine phosphatase, inhibits endothelial-cell growth and angiogenesis. Blood 108, 12341242.
  • 164
    Lee SR, Kwon KS, Kim SR & Rhee SG (1998) Reversible inactivation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B in A431 cells stimulated with epidermal growth factor. J Biol Chem 273, 1536615372.
  • 165
    Mahadev K, Wu X, Zilbering A, Zhu L, Lawrence JT & Goldstein BJ (2001) Hydrogen peroxide generated during cellular insulin stimulation is integral to activation of the distal insulin signaling cascade in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem 276, 4866248669.
  • 166
    Meng TC, Buckley DA, Galic S, Tiganis T & Tonks NK (2004) Regulation of insulin signaling through reversible oxidation of the protein-tyrosine phosphatases TC45 and PTP1B. J Biol Chem 279, 3771637725.
  • 167
    Meng TC, Fukada T & Tonks NK (2002) Reversible oxidation and inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in vivo. Mol Cell 9, 387399.
  • 168
    Singh DK, Kumar D, Siddiqui Z, Basu SK, Kumar V & Rao KV (2005) The strength of receptor signaling is centrally controlled through a cooperative loop between Ca2+ and an oxidant signal. Cell 121, 281293.
  • 169
    Chiarugi P, Pani G, Giannoni E, Taddei L, Colavitti R, Raugei G, Symons M, Borrello S, Galeotti T & Ramponi G (2003) Reactive oxygen species as essential mediators of cell adhesion: the oxidative inhibition of a FAK tyrosine phosphatase is required for cell adhesion. J Cell Biol 161, 933944.
  • 170
    Mitchell D, O’Meara SJ, Gaffney A, Crean JK, Kinsella BT & Godson C (2007) The Lipoxin A4 receptor is coupled to SHP-2 activation: implications for regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 282, 1560615618.
  • 171
    Chen CH, Cheng TH, Lin H, Shih NL, Chen YL, Chen YS, Cheng CF, Lian WS, Meng TC, Chiu WT et al. (2006) Reactive oxygen species generation is involved in epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation through the transient oxidization of Src homology 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase in endothelin-1 signaling pathway in rat cardiac fibroblasts. Mol Pharmacol 69, 13471355.
  • 172
    Gross S, Knebel A, Tenev T, Neininger A, Gaestel M, Herrlich P & Böhmer FD (1999) Inactivation of protein-tyrosine phosphatases as mechanism of UV-induced signal transduction. J Biol Chem 274, 2637826386.
  • 173
    Xu Y, Shao Y, Voorhees JJ & Fisher GJ (2006) Oxidative inhibition of receptor-type protein-tyrosine phosphatase kappa by ultraviolet irradiation activates epidermal growth factor receptor in human keratinocytes. J Biol Chem 281, 2738927397.
  • 174
    Pani G, Colavitti R, Bedogni B, Anzevino R, Borrello S & Galeotti T (2000) A redox signaling mechanism for density-dependent inhibition of cell growth. J Biol Chem 275, 3889138899.
  • 175
    Chen IJ, Chen HL & Demetriou M (2007) Lateral compartmentalization of T cell receptor versus CD45 by galectin–N-glycan binding and microfilaments coordinates basal and activation signaling. J Biol Chem 282, 3536135372.
  • 176
    Walzel H, Schulz U, Neels P & Brock J (1999) Galectin-1, a natural ligand for the receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase CD45. Immunol Lett 67, 193202.
  • 177
    Gonzalez-Brito MR & Bixby JL (2006) Differential activities in adhesion and neurite growth of fibronectin type III repeats in the PTP-delta extracellular domain. Int J Dev Neurosci 24, 425429.
  • 178
    Wang J & Bixby JL (1999) Receptor tyrosine phosphatase-delta is a homophilic, neurite-promoting cell adhesion molecular for CNS neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci 14, 370384.
  • 179
    O’Grady P, Thai TC & Saito H (1998) The laminin-nidogen complex is a ligand for a specific splice isoform of the transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR. J Cell Biol 141, 16751684.
  • 180
    Baker MW, Rauth SJ & Macagno ER (2000) Possible role of the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase HmLAR2 in interbranch repulsion in a leech embryonic cell. J Neurobiol 45, 4760.
  • 181
    Sap J, Jiang YP, Friedlander D, Grumet M & Schlessinger J (1994) Receptor tyrosine phosphatase R-PTP-kappa mediates homophilic binding. Mol Cell Biol 14, 19.
  • 182
    Brady-Kalnay SM, Flint AJ & Tonks NK (1993) Homophilic binding of PTP mu, a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase, can mediate cell-cell aggregation. J Cell Biol 122, 961972.
  • 183
    Ensslen-Craig SE & Brady-Kalnay SM (2005) PTP mu expression and catalytic activity are required for PTP mu-mediated neurite outgrowth and repulsion. Mol Cell Neurosci 28, 177188.
  • 184
    Gebbink MF, Zondag GC, Wubbolts RW, Beijersbergen RL, van Etten I & Moolenaar WH (1993) Cell–cell adhesion mediated by a receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 268, 1610116104.
  • 185
    Cheng J, Wu K, Armanini M, O’Rourke N, Dowbenko D & Lasky LA (1997) A novel protein-tyrosine phosphatase related to the homotypically adhering kappa and mu receptors. J Biol Chem 272, 72647277.
  • 186
    Sörby M, Sandström J & Östman A (2001) An extracellular ligand increases the specific activity of the receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase DEP-1. Oncogene 20, 52195224.
  • 187
    Barnea G, Grumet M, Milev P, Silvennoinen O, Levy JB, Sap J & Schlessinger J (1994) Receptor tyrosine phosphatase beta is expressed in the form of proteoglycan and binds to the extracellular matrix protein tenascin. J Biol Chem 269, 1434914352.
  • 188
    Peles E, Nativ M, Campbell PL, Sakurai T, Martinez R, Lev S, Clary DO, Schilling J, Barnea G, Plowman GD et al. (1995) The carbonic anhydrase domain of receptor tyrosine phosphatase beta is a functional ligand for the axonal cell recognition molecule contactin. Cell 82, 251260.
  • 189
    Milev P, Maurel P, Haring M, Margolis RK & Margolis RU (1996) TAG-1/axonin-1 is a high-affinity ligand of neurocan, phosphacan/protein-tyrosine phosphatase-zeta/beta, and N-CAM. J Biol Chem 271, 1571615723.