Dual localization of glutathione S-transferase in the cytosol and mitochondria: implications in oxidative stress, toxicity and disease

Authors


Haider Raza, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, PO Box 17666, Al Ain, UAE.
Fax: +971 3 7672033
Tel: +971 3 7137506
E-mail: h.raza@uaeu.ac.ae

Abstract

Glutathione (GSH) conjugating enzymes, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), are present in different subcellular compartments including cytosol, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, nucleus and plasma membrane. The regulation and function of GSTs have implications in cell growth, oxidative stress as well as disease progression and prevention. Of the several mitochondria localized forms, GSTK (GST kappa) is mitochondria-specific since it contains N-terminal canonical and cleavable mitochondria targeting signals. Other forms like GST alpha, mu and pi purified from mitochondria are similar to the cytosolic molecular forms or ‘echoproteins’. Altered GST expression has been implicated in hepatic, cardiac and neurological diseases. Mitochondria-specific GSTK has also been implicated in obesity, diabetes and related metabolic disorders. Studies have shown that silencing the GSTA4 (GST alpha) gene resulted in mitochondrial dysfunction, as was also seen in GSTA4 null mice, which could contribute to insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. This review highlights the significance of the mitochondrial GST pool, particularly the mechanism and significance of dual targeting of GSTA4-4 under in vitro and in vivo conditions. GSTA4-4 is targeted in the mitochondria by activation of the internal cryptic signal present at the C-terminus of the protein by protein-kinase-dependent phosphorylation and cytosolic heat shock protein (Hsp70) chaperone. Mitochondrial GST pi, on the other hand, has been shown to have two uncleaved cryptic signals rich in positively charged amino acids at the N-terminal region. Both physiological and pathophysiological implications of GST translocation to mitochondria are discussed in the review.

Abbreviations
cGSH

cytosolic GSH

cGST

cytosolic GST

CYP

cytochrome P450

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

GSH

glutathione

GSSG

oxidized glutathione

GST

glutathione S-transferase

4-HNE

4-hydroxynonenal

Hsp

heat shock proteins

MAP

mitogen-activated protein

mGSH

mitochondrial GSH

mGST

mitochondrial GST

ROS

reactive oxygen species

UCP

uncoupling protein

Introduction

The induced expression of multiple forms of glutathione S-transferase (GST; EC 2.5.1.18) appears to be an evolutionary response of cells for protection against chemical toxicity and oxidative stress. The tissue- and species-specific expression and distribution of GSTs are considered to be an adaptive response against the toxicity of endogenous and exogenous metabolites [1,2] and oxidative stress related degenerative disorders, and in drug resistance seen in cancer therapy. GST isoenzymes have also been implicated in the progression of cancer [1–4]. GSTs play an important role in the activation of signals by mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases and various transcription factors that regulate apoptosis and cell survival [4,5]. Maintenance of the cellular antioxidant glutathione (GSH) in different cellular compartments is also critically regulated by GSTs. GST is a multifunctional enzyme involved in cellular detoxification of endogenous toxic metabolites, superoxide radicals and exogenous toxic chemicals [3,4]. The ubiquitous distribution of GSTs in microbes, animals and plants signifies the physiological importance of this multigene family of enzymes.

GSTs are divided into soluble cytosolic [cGST alpha (A, α), mu (M, μ), Pi (pi, π), omega (ω), theta (T, θ), delta (δ), sigma (σ), zeta (ζ)], mitochondrial [mGST α, μ, π and kappa (K)] and structurally distinct membrane-bound microsomal GST (MGST). The MGST family contains six members including 1, 2, 3, leukotriene C-4 synthase, 5-lipoxygenase activating protein and prostaglandin E synthase, now referred to as membrane-associated proteins in eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism members [1,2]. Each member of the family has multiple isoenzymes with overlapping substrate specificity. GSTs with some specific catalytic properties have also been reported in the plasma membrane, outer mitochondrial membrane as well as in the nucleus [1–3]. Several groups, including ours, have successfully purified and characterized multiple forms of GSTs from hepatic mitochondria [6–10]. Recently, dual localization of GSTK in the peroxisome and mitochondria has been reported [10]. These mitochondrial GST (mGST) proteins are coded by nuclear genes, synthesized in the cytoplasm and then transported to mitochondria using two separate mechanisms: (a) the mitochondria-specific form GSTK-1 is expressed with an N-terminal extension which contains a putative mitochondria targeting signal [10] and (b) in the other cases the nearly intact and unprocessed GST proteins are translocated to mitochondria using signal sequences resident within the protein. The transport of nearly intact GST proteins to the mitochondrial compartment requires the help of chaperones and mitochondrial membrane-bound translocases. The mechanism of import of GSTs into mitochondria will be discussed later.

Mitochondrial GSH pool and its regulation

Despite its exclusive synthesis in the cytosol [11], GSH is distributed in other intracellular organelles. Almost 85–90% of cellular GSH is present in the cytosol, 10%–15% in the mitochondria (equivalent to 10–12 mm, considering the volume of mitochondrial matrix) and a small percentage is in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and nucleus [11]. GSH exists in the reduced thiol (GSH) and oxidized disulfide (GSSG) forms. The compartmentalization of GSH constitutes distinct redox pools in terms of balance between oxidized and reduced forms and their turnover rates. Cytosolic GSH (cGSH) has a rapid turnover of 2–3 h while mitochondrial GSH (mGSH) has a relatively longer half-life of 30 h. GSH is predominantly (∼ 98–99%) found in the reduced form in most cell compartments, with the exception of the ER where it exists mainly in the oxidized form, GSSG. A shift in this balance is a good indicator of cellular redox stress.

Mitochondria are the primary site of oxygen metabolism and their proper function is closely linked to maintenance of the GSH pool. The mGSH pool is exclusively derived from the cytosol since these organelles lack the enzyme system for GSH synthesis. The cytosol to mitochondrial translocation of GSH is dependent on a functional transport system. At physiological pH 7.4, GSH exists as an anion and hence is permeable to cross the outer mitochondrial membrane. In liver and kidney mitochondria, there exist two major anion carriers, dicarboxylate and oxoglutarate, along with other anions (glutamate, citrate, aspartate, tricarboxylate) which mediate the exchange of GSH for phosphate and dicarboxylate across the inner mitochondrial membrane. The uptake of GSH by rat kidney mitochondria appears to be saturable (Km = 1.3 mm, Vmax = 5.59 nmol·min−1·mg−1 protein). However, it is not clear if this is a general mechanism of GSH import in all tissues [11,12]. Mitochondrial membrane fluidity, especially cholesterol content, is also a key factor regulating GSH import into mitochondria. Increase in cholesterol content of the inner mitochondrial membrane, as seen in rodents under chronic treatment with alcohol or under certain oxidative stress conditions such as hypoxia, diminishes GSH import into mitochondria. It is noteworthy that GSH transport to mitochondria is unidirectional since no back transport of mGSH to the cytosol has been reported. Increasing the fluidity of the mitochondrial inner membrane increases cGSH transport into mitochondria [12,13].

mGSH pool in pathology

mGSH status is closely associated with mitochondrial oxygen consumption, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and redox status. A majority of mitochondrial respiratory and transport enzymes contain critical sulfhydryl groups that must be maintained in the reduced form. Alteration in mGSH concentration has been associated with numerous oxidative stress related disorders including aging, cancer, diabetes, hypoxia, ischemia/injury and other diseases associated with cardiac, hepatic and neurological functions [12–15]. Under experimental or pathophysiological conditions, mGSH and cGSH pools can be selectively depleted, and upon depletion recovery of the mGSH pool takes a significantly longer time [10,13] than that of cGSH. Our previous studies have also shown that in cells treated with an oxidant lipid aldehyde, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), the cGSH and mGSH pools are differently affected and the recovery of the mGSH pool is significantly delayed compared with the cGSH pool [8]. The mGSH pool size is also dependent upon the turnover and metabolism of GSH in mitochondria [12,14]. Under oxidative stress conditions, as seen in ischemia-associated cardiovascular and neurological disorders, altered mGSH content and the ratio of mGSH to GSSG are directly associated with increased production of ROS [12–15]. Therefore, a sustained mGSH pool in the mitochondrial matrix would be advantageous to minimize the potential ROS-induced oxidative insults during physiological and pathophysiological metabolism of oxygen in the mitochondria [15].

Under both physiological and pathological conditions, the mGSH pool is regulated by a combination of mGSH transport activity and GSH metabolism. The important enzymes of GSH metabolism inside the mitochondria are glutathione peroxidases (GSHPX1 and 4) which protect (detoxify the endogenous and exogenous toxic peroxides by conjugating with GSH) the mitochondria against oxidative degeneration. The other GSH metabolizing enzymes are mGSTs, which play a significant role in protecting mitochondrial functions by enzymatic transfer of GSH to proteins and metabolites. mGSH is also utilized for glutathionylation of proteins by glutaredoxin-2/thioltransferases. mGSH reductase, which recycles GSSG back to GSH, also plays a significant role in protecting mitochondria against oxidative stress. These enzymes are differentially regulated in the cytosol and mitochondria when exposed to chemical, biological or physical insults [12,14–16].

mGST pool

The mGST (GST13-13) was first identified in rat liver mitochondria by Harris et al. [6]. This enzyme was later characterized as GST kappa (GSTK1-1) and the human (hGSTK1-1) and murine (mGSTK1-1) homologues have since been identified [10,17]. Over the years, multiple forms of GST in hepatic mitochondria have been characterized in rats, mice and humans [6–10]. However, very little is known about their physiological properties, functions and regulation. Mitochondria are the main site for ROS production during respiration coupled oxygen metabolism that may ultimately damage membrane lipids, DNA and proteins. Consequently, it is believed that GSTs play a key role in protecting mitochondrial genetic and metabolic machinery against oxidative insults. mGSTs are also presumed to render protection against cardiolipin oxidation in the mitochondrial inner membrane, which in turn prevents the release of cytochrome c and initiation of apoptosis. We have previously reported the presence of class alpha and mu GSTs in rat and mouse liver mitochondria and also in rat brain mitochondria [7,8,18]. Gallagher et al. [9] showed the presence of alpha GSTA4-4 only in the mitochondria but not in the cytosol. In contrast, we and others have shown the presence of GSTA4-4 in both cytosol and mitochondria [8,17].

Our studies have shown that the preferred substrate for mGSTA4-4 is 4-HNE, an endogenous toxic product of lipid peroxidation under oxidative stress conditions. Our recent studies using immunolabeling and confocal microscopy have indicated increased translocation of GSTA4-4 from cytosol to mitochondria when cells were incubated with 4-HNE, tumor promoter phorbol ester (PMA), or cAMP (protein kinase A activator) suggesting its role in cancer and in protecting mitochondrial functions under oxidative stress conditions [8,19]. Since 4-HNE is considered as a signaling molecule, preferential metabolism of this molecule in the mitochondria may modulate mitochondrial signaling pathways. We have also identified other GST isoenzymes, GSTA1/2 and GSTM1/2, in mouse liver mitochondria [8], which was later confirmed by Thomson et al. [17] and in human liver by Gallagher et al. [9]. Gallagher et al. [9] have also described the occurrence of trace amounts of GSTPi in the human liver mitochondria. A recent study by Goto et al. [20] has shown the presence of GSTPi in the mitochondria as well as nucleus of mammalian cells.

Mitochondrial targeting of GSTs

Several studies have shown that GST isoenzymes in mitochondria are structurally and catalytically similar to their cytosolic counterparts [6–9,17–20]. These proteins are now often termed ‘echoproteins’. These studies indicate that the import of mGST isoforms depends on the internal cryptic signals, without any proteolytic processing or alternative translation of the protein, similar to what has been established for some of the mitochondrial cytochrome P450s (CYPs) and other proteins [21–23]. Mitochondrial-specific GST kappa (GSTK1-1), however, is a unique GST, distinct from the cGSTs as it has a putative cleavable N-terminal signal for mitochondrial translocation and a C-terminal signal sequence, Ala-Arg-Leu, for peroxisomal targeting [10]. In general, the majority of mitochondrial imported proteins have 15–40 N-terminal cleavable residues rich in positively charged and hydroxylated amino acids which form an amphipathic helix essential for interaction with negatively charged residues on the translocase of the outer membrane of the mitochondrial complex and import of proteins from the cytosol to the mitochondrial matrix ([22] and the accompanying review by Avadhani et al. [24]). However, a number of mitochondria targeted proteins, particularly the xenobiotic inducible CYPs, lack a cleavable N-terminal pre-sequence ([21,23–30] and the accompanying reviews by Knockaert et al. [31] and Yogev et al. [32]). In these cases, the bimodal targeting of proteins to ER and mitochondria is catalyzed by the chimeric signals they carry. Furthermore, the bimodal targeting of these predominantly microsomal CYPs is facilitated by post-translational phosphorylation by kinases under physiological and pathological conditions ([25–30] and Knockaert et al. [31] in this series). Protein kinase A mediated phosphorylation of serine residues of CYPs increases the affinity of proteins for binding to cytoplasmic chaperones such as heat shock proteins (Hsp), Hsp70/Hsp90, resulting in increased mitochondrial translocation [28–30].

The molecular mechanism by which recombinant mouse mGSTA4-4 is targeted to mitochondria was investigated using a combination of in vitro mitochondrial import assay and in vivo targeting in COS cells transfected with GSTA4-4 cDNA. Results showed that mGSTA4-4 is hyperphosphorylated compared with cGSTA4-4. Both cAMP and PMA markedly increased the import of GSTA4-4 from cytosol to mitochondria. Mutational analysis shows that the putative mitochondrial targeting signal in GSTA4-4 resides within C-terminal 20 amino acids and Ser189 and Thr193 are the sites for phosphorylation activation of the import signal [25]. The targeting function of the C-terminal sequence was further confirmed in experiments showing that the C-terminal 172–222 sequence of GSTA4-4 was able to target the N-terminally fused, but not C-terminally fused, dihydrofolate reductase (a cytosolic protein) to mitochondria. In addition, we have also provided evidence that hyperphosphorylated mGSTA4-4 has an increased affinity for molecular chaperone Hsp70 compared with the hypophosphorylated cGSTA4-4. Our hypothesis is that the newly synthesized GSTA4-4 subunits have two fates: (a) cytosolic retention due to inefficient phosphorylation and Hsp70 binding which results in rapid folding and dimerization of subunits which makes them incompetent for import; (b) mitochondrial import due to hyperphosphorylation and Hsp70 binding preventing rapid dimerization in the cytosol and making them import competent [25] (Fig. 1). The import competent conformational change in GSTA4-4 is augmented under oxidative stress conditions, due to increased ROS production as seen in numerous diseases, suggesting a physiological role of mGSTA4-4 (Fig. 2A,B).

Figure 1.

 Bimodal targeting of GSTA4-4 in the cytosol and mitochondria. Model showing Ser189/Thr193 protein kinase dependent phosphorylation of GST A4-4 has increased affinity for chaperone Hsp70 which activates mitochondrial competent import signals for GSTA4-4. The non-phosphorylated form is retained in the cytosol. Increased oxidative stress and activated protein kinase enhances mitochondrial import of GSTA4-4.

Figure 2.

 (A) Mitochondrial oxygen metabolism and electron leakage in ROS production and toxicity. (B) Mitochondrial GSH/GST pools implicated in the protection of oxidative stress related complications.

In a recent study, Goto et al. [20] have reported that mitochondrial targeting of GSTPi also involves no detectable protease processing. They observed no difference in the size of cGSTPi and mGSTPi forms and the mitochondrial translocation depended on an internal signal located at its N-terminal region. They identified two clusters (1–19 and 71–84) of positively charged amino acid rich regions as possible mitochondria targeting signals of mGSTPi. The reasons for the observed difference in the location of signal from C-terminal in the case of GSTA4-4 to N-terminal in the case of GSTPi remain unclear. Nevertheless, it is clear from these studies that cryptic mitochondria targeting signals of GST isoforms are used for their bimodal targeting to mitochondria.

Physiological role of mGSH and GSTs

ROS production in the mitochondria at the sites of complex I and complex III of the respiratory chain is a physiological process occurring during oxygen reduction and ATP synthesis. ROS at a lower level may function as signaling intermediates for cell survival [33]. ROS at higher level cause oxidative stress and cell death and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases, notably neurodegeneration, aging, cancer, ischemia and diabetes [33,34] (Fig. 2A,B). GSH is critical for cellular functions, cell growth and cell death. GSH also regulates signaling pathways mostly by maintaining redox status, ROS, sulfhydryl groups of cellular proteins, and oxidative stress which activates various signal transduction and transcriptional pathways [10,12,15,16,23]. As mentioned above, mitochondria lack GSH synthesis and therefore depend on the import of cGSH. Increased cellular GSH promotes the growth of normal as well as cancer cells presumably by modulating rate-limiting enzymes in DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression [10,12,35]. GSH also modulates cell death by redox regulation of mitochondrial functions, ATP synthesis and thiol contents of signaling molecules like NFκB, stress kinases and caspases [10,12,35].

As mentioned above, the mGSH pool (10–15%) is metabolically separate from the cGSH pool in terms of synthesis and turnover. Increased mitochondrial stress has been reported when the mGSH level is below a critical level (i.e. 2–3 nmol·mg−1 protein) [15]. Recent studies have shown that mGSH also plays a significant role in trafficking antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and proton transporter uncoupler protein 2 (UCP2) and therefore is critically involved in cell survival and cell death mechanisms [15]. Additionally, mGSH also interacts with NO by formation of S-nitroglutathione and thus mGSH may serve as an NO donor or reservoir. The high concentration of mGSH and mGSTs and the presence of NO synthase in mitochondria suggest the physiological role of mGSH [15,35]. GSH-dependent protein S-glutathionylation of mitochondrial complex I is involved in shifting the balance of mGSH/GSSG physiologically and is also implicated in oxidative damage in many pathologies and altered mitochondrial bioenergetics [36]. Similarly, glutathionylation of mitochondrial complex II has been implicated in post ischemic heart diseases [35]. Glutathionylation of adenine nucleotide translocase has been reported to prevent mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis [37]. Furthermore, GSH contributes to the reduction of physiological hydroperoxides, including the products of lipid peroxidation, through GST and glutathione peroxidase (GSHPX) which will be discussed later in this review. These studies have shown that mGSH plays multiple roles in maintaining mitochondrial bioenergetics in normal and disease conditions.

Pathophysiological role of mGSH and GSTs

The mGSH pool, mitochondrial ROS production and mitochondrial metabolic and oxidative stress have been consistently implicated in physiological aging and many hepatic, cardiac and neurological diseases and ischemia/reperfusion associated disorders [15]. Dynamics of the mGSH pool play a central role in these processes. mGSH, besides playing a critical role in mitochondrial bioenergetics, cell survival and apoptosis, is critically involved in the etiology and pathophysiology of numerous oxidative stress related disorders [12–16,33,38,39]. A number of mitochondria targeted antioxidants have been developed which efficiently scavenge ROS from dysfunctional mitochondria. These antioxidants may prove effective in the treatment of the disorders [40,41]. Permeabilization of mitochondrial membrane has been extensively implicated with apoptotic and necrotic cell death as seen during drug/chemical-induced toxicity, cancer and therapeutic interventions. A depleted mGSH promotes the oxidation of critical thiols of mitochondrial membrane and leads to mitochondrial permeabilization and cytochrome c release associated with apoptosis [15]. Gradual loss of mGSH and mitochondrial physiological functions has also been a hallmark of the aging process [42]. Alterations in the mGSH pool and its metabolism and altered ROS production have been associated with the initiation and progression of diabetes and insulin sensitivity [43–45]. Recent studies from our laboratory have demonstrated the protective role of mGSH and GSTs in ischemia/reperfusion and hypoxia induced injuries by ROS, alcohol and other toxic agents [29,46,47]. Our studies and others have also shown that mitochondrial oxidative and metabolic stress due to altered respiration and ROS production play an important role in cancer progression and metastasis [48,49].

Previous studies have shown high specificity of mGSTA4-4 for the metabolism of an endogenous signaling molecule, 4-HNE [8,25]. Additionally, increased translocation of GSTA4-4 to the mitochondria under increased oxidative and chemical stress was suggested as a possible mechanism for protection against oxidative damage [8,18,25]. A recent study by Curtis et al. [50] has also demonstrated that downregulation of adipose tissue GSTA4-4 leads to increased mitochondrial dysfunctions and oxidative stress leading to reduced insulin sensitivity. 4-HNE-mediated action on cellular metabolism is concentration dependent (toxic at 10 μm or higher and signal regulatory at lower level) depending on the makeup of transcription factors bound to cis-acting elements. Signaling by growth regulatory ERK, Nrf1/Nrf2, AP-1, TNFα and NFκB and selective regulation by Keap1 pathways have all been implicated in GSH/GST regulation [5,47,51]. Mitochondrial ROS and 4-HNE are also potent activators of proton conductance by mitochondrial uncoupling proteins, UCP2 and UCP3. The uncoupling of mitochondria may be a mechanism to defend against oxidative stress by diminishing ROS production [52]. In addition to GSTA4-4, mitochondria also possess multiple other isoforms of GSTs which might also play a role in redox-regulated signaling, cell survival and death. GST isoenzymes, GSTM1 and GSTPi, have been shown to protect cells against TGFβ-induced apoptosis by MAP kinase and JNK dependent pathways.

The accumulation of ceramide in the mitochondria which inhibits GST alpha gene transactivation and Bax translocation presumably through Nrf2 and HNF1 also seems to play a role in apoptosis [53]. The GST superfamily has been implicated in the storage of NO in the form of dinitro-diglutathionyl-iron complex. NO is known to regulate a number of physiological functions including inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase, formation of peroxynitrate with mitochondrial superoxide and S-nitrosylation of proteins. Mitochondrial NO has also been shown to compensate for depleted GSH and thus prevents cell death by preserving protein thiols [54,55]. GSH conjugation with NO appears to play a critical role in hypoxia-induced cell signaling. mGSH is also implicated in protecting mitochondria against the deleterious effects of peroxynitrate. Reports suggest that mitochondrial calcium accumulation and release are responsible for many pathologies and apoptosis. The mGSH pool and S-glutathionylation of specific proteins act as a molecular linker between calcium and redox signaling [56]. Recent studies by Shield et al. [57] and Morel and Aninat [58] have shown that polymorphism in human GSTK1 gene plays an important role in lipid metabolism, obesity and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Dual localization of GSTK1 enzyme in peroxisomes and mitochondria, the two compartments involved in lipid metabolism, support the regulatory function of this enzyme in energy metabolism. GST kappa is also a key regulator of adiponectin biosynthesis and, since adiponectin expression has been correlated with insulin resistance, obesity and diabetes, GSTK1 expression level which is negatively correlated with obesity in human adipose tissues may be an important factor in these metabolic disorders. Polymorphism in numerous cGST isoenzymes have also been implicated in the development of specific cancers in human. However, the precise role of mGSTs in cancer and implications of individual variations are not clear.

Conclusion

Alterations in mitochondrial bioenergetics and redox metabolism by modulation of the mGSH pool have been implicated in several diseases. mGSH directly regulates ROS production, protein glutathionylation, protein/enzyme sulfhydryl modification and calcium homeostasis which in turn affect cell physiology, aging and pathophysiology of diseases such as diabetes, cancer and ischemia/reperfusion associated damage. A number of therapeutic approaches can be appropriately designed to increase the mGSH pool by increasing the expression of mGSH carriers and/or by selectively manipulating GSH metabolism [10–16]. Unfortunately, mitochondrial electron transport complexes and other enzymes that contribute to mitochondrial ROS production are not appropriate therapeutic targets for protection against oxidative stress without extreme physiological consequences. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and prodrugs are probably better suited for this purpose. Pharmacological or physiological interference that enhance mGSH level presents a potential way by which oxidative damage can be directly countered. In this respect, studies on mechanisms of mitochondria targeting of GSTs and other enzymes involved in GSH metabolism may present important therapeutic targets.

Acknowledgements

Support from the Terry Fox Cancer Research Fund and grants from the Research Committee, FMHS-UAE University (HR), and support from NIH grant GM-34883 (principal investigator, NG Avadhani, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA) are acknowledged.

Ancillary