• 1
    Asha S, Curtis K, Grant N et al. Comparison of radiation exposure of trauma patients from diagnostic radiology procedures before and after the introduction of a panscan protocol. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2012; 24: 4351.
  • 2
    Cowan I, Cresswell C, Liu H, Siew T, Ardagh M, Than M. Selective versus mandatory whole-body computed tomography scanning in the multiply injured patient. Emerg. Med. Australas. 2012; 24: 115116.
  • 3
    Gupta M, Schriger DL, Hiatt JR et al. Selective use of computed tomography compared with routine whole body imaging in patients with blunt trauma. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2011; 58: 40716.
  • 4
    Tillou A, Gupta M, Baraff LJ et al. Is the use of pan-computed tomography for blunt trauma justified? A prospective evaluation. J. Trauma 2009; 67: 77987.
  • 5
    Stengel D, Bauwens K, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Ekkernkamp A. Association between compliance with methodological standards of diagnostic research and reported test accuracy: meta-analysis of focused assessment of US for trauma. Radiology 2005; 236: 10211.
  • 6
    Stengel D, Frank M, Matthes G et al. Primary pan-computed tomography for blunt multiple trauma: can the whole be better than its parts? Injury 2009; 40 (Suppl 4): S36S46.
  • 7
    Russ H, Clouth J, Porzsolt F. Theory behind the bridging principles. In: Porzsolt F, Kaplan RM, eds. Optimizing Health. Improving the Value of Healthcare Delivery, 1st edn. New York: Springer, 2006; 3642.
  • 8
    Huber-Wagner S, Lefering R, Qvick LM et al. Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet 2009; 373: 145561.
  • 9
    Buxton W. Less is more (more or less). In: Denning P, ed. The Invisible Future: The Seamless Integration of Technology in Everyday Life. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001; 14579.
  • 10
    Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 2009; 374: 108996.