SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    White B, Willmott L, Trowse P, Parker M, Cartwright C. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 1 (New South Wales). J. Law Med. 2011; 18: 498522.
  • 2
    McCrary SV, Swanson JW, Perkins HS, Winslade WJ. Treatment decisions for terminally ill patients: physicians’ legal defensiveness and knowledge of medical law. Law Med. Health Care 1992; 20: 364376.
  • 3
    McCrary SV, Swanson JW. Physicians’ legal defensiveness and knowledge of medical law: comparing Denmark and the USA. Scand. J. Public Health 1999; 27: 1821.
  • 4
    McCrary SV, Swanson JW, Coulehan J, Faber-Langendoen K, Olick RS, Belling C. Physicians’ legal defensiveness in end-of-life treatment decisions: comparing attitudes and knowledge in states with different laws. J. Clin. Ethics 2006; 17: 1526.
  • 5
    Schildmann J, Doyal L, Cushing A, Vollmann J. Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers. J. Med. Ethics 2006; 32: 567570.
  • 6
    Darvall L, McMahon M, Piterman L. Medico-legal knowledge of general practitioners: disjunctions, errors and uncertainties. J. Law Med. 2001; 9: 167184.
  • 7
    Ashby M, Wakefield M, Beilby J. General practitioners’ knowledge and use of living wills. BMJ 1995; 310: 230.
  • 8
    Wong RE, Weiland TJ, Jelinek GA. Emergency clinicians’ attitudes and decisions in patient scenarios involving advance directives. Emerg. Med. J. 2011; doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200287.