Novelty and processing demands in conceptual combination
Article first published online: 11 MAY 2012
© 2012 The Australian Psychological Society
Australian Journal of Psychology
Volume 64, Issue 4, pages 199–208, December 2012
How to Cite
Ramm, B. J. and Halford, G. S. (2012), Novelty and processing demands in conceptual combination. Australian Jnl of Psychology, 64: 199–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2012.00053.x
- Issue published online: 19 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 11 MAY 2012
- Received 8 November 2011. Accepted for publication 26 March 2012.
- conceptual combination;
- probe reaction time;
- processing demands;
- working memory
In this article, we sought to isolate the processing demands of combining the concepts of modifier-noun phrases from those of other language comprehension processes. Probe reaction time (RT) was used as an indication of the processing resources required for combining concepts. Phrase frequency (as measured by Google hit rates) was used as a metric of the degree of conceptual combination required for each phrase. Participants were asked to interpret modifier-noun phrases using a sense-nonsense decision (Experiment 1) and a phrase meaning access task (Experiment 2). Experiment 2 also used a lexical decision task to activate the word's individual meanings. Regression analyses for both experiments indicated that phrase frequency (indicating novelty) predicts a significant portion of the probe RT variance, such that low-frequency phrases required more processing resources than high-frequency phrases, when controlling for associative strength, word frequency, letter length, and lexical-semantic activation. Overall, this study indicates that conceptual combination requires processing resources beyond those of other language processes.