INSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLES TO RN UNIONIZATION: HOW “VOTE NO” THINKING IS DEEPLY EMBEDDED IN THE NURSING PROFESSION
Article first published online: 31 MAY 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00235.x
© Copyright the Author. Journal Compilation © 2009 Immanuel Ness and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Gordon, S. (2009), INSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLES TO RN UNIONIZATION: HOW “VOTE NO” THINKING IS DEEPLY EMBEDDED IN THE NURSING PROFESSION. WorkingUSA, 12: 279–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00235.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 31 MAY 2009
- Article first published online: 31 MAY 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
The essay examines private sector unionization in the U.S., arguing that elections for representation frequently are unfairly unbalanced against supporters of union representation. Given that hospital administrators typically harbor an antiunion bias, with few exceptions, representation elections are permeated with employer propaganda to ensure their institutions remain nonunion. Passage of the Employee Free Choice Act would significantly improve the capacity of nurses to organize unions of their choice through card check rules, while reducing the hospital management “vote-no” campaigns that are highly unfavorable toward labor organizing. Unionization is a means to significantly improve conditions for nurses, who are the principle “guardians of the sick.”

1743-4580/asset/WUSA_left.gif?v=1&s=44978a178c1b307feee9def8254c3ac5217bc01c)
1743-4580/asset/WUSA_centre.gif?v=1&s=2c6d789201202a141bc83e1352d4247984e37391)
1743-4580/asset/WUSA_right.gif?v=1&s=7dbbd5efe63bb1731ebe2db070a71bdae860ae07)
