Introduction. Radical prostatectomy is a frequently used treatment option for prostate cancer; however, prostatectomy is often associated with significant morbidity, including erectile dysfunction (ED).
Aim. To analyze the efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treating ED after radical prostatectomy.
Materials and Methods. MEDLINE and CANCERLIT (1998 to January 2004) were searched for English language articles using the key words prostatectomy, sildenafil, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: primary, discrete data sets of postprostatectomy patients with ED treated with sildenafil monotherapy.
Results. Sample sizes ranged from 13 to 198 (mean age, 61 ± 3 years). Treatment durations were 4 weeks (or more than four doses) to 1 year, and sildenafil dosing was in the recommended range (25–100 mg). Seven studies reported a response rate (range, 14%−53%) for an end point consistent with the primary analysis outcome (erection sufficient for vaginal intercourse); the combined estimate of probability of response was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%−48%). There was strong evidence for a lower response rate after non–nerve-sparing (range, 0%−15%) versus nerve-sparing surgery (range, 35%−75%; combined odds ratio [OR] = 12.1; 95% CI, 5.5–26.6) but not after unilateral (range, 10%−80%) versus bilateral nerve-sparing surgery (range, 46%−72%; combined OR = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.75–6.54).
Conclusions. The results of these studies demonstrate that with sildenafil, more than one third of patients with postprostatectomy ED achieved erection sufficient for intercourse. The odds of responding improved 12-fold with preservation of at least one neurovascular bundle. Early treatment failure does not necessarily imply lack of efficacy in the future, and patients should be encouraged to continue trying sildenafil, titrating up to 100 mg as needed. Montorsi F, and McCullough A. Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of clinical data. J Sex Med 2005;2:658–667.