Association between Preoperative Erectile Dysfunction and Prostate Cancer Features—An Analysis from the Duke Prostate Center Database
Article first published online: 21 DEC 2011
© 2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 4, pages 1174–1181, April 2012
How to Cite
Kimura, M., Bañez, L. L., Gerber, L., Qi, J., Tsivian, M., Freedland, S. J., Satoh, T., Polascik, T. J., Baba, S. and Moul, J. W. (2012), Association between Preoperative Erectile Dysfunction and Prostate Cancer Features—An Analysis from the Duke Prostate Center Database. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9: 1174–1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02547.x
- Issue published online: 28 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 21 DEC 2011
- Prostate Cancer;
- Erectile Dysfunction;
- Risk Factor;
- Preoperative Erectile Function;
- Chronic Inflammation
Introduction. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is related to several co-morbidities including obesity, metabolic syndrome, cigarette smoking, and low testosterone, all of which have been reported to be associated with adverse prostate cancer features.
Aim. To examine whether preoperative ED has a relationship with adverse prostate cancer features in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods. We analyzed data from our institution on 676 patients who underwent RP between 2001 and 2010. Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between preoperative ED and several pathological parameters. The log-rank test and multivariate proportional hazards model were conducted to determine the association of preoperative ED with biochemical recurrence (BCR).
Main Outcome Measures. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) instrument was used to evaluate preoperative erectile function (EF). Preoperative normal EF was defined as EPIC-SF ≥ 60 points while ED was defined as preoperative EPIC-SF lower than 60 points.
Results. Preoperatively, a total of 343 (50.7%) men had normal EF and 333 (49.3%) men had ED. After adjusting for covariates, preoperative ED was identified a risk factor for positive extracapsular extension (OR 1.57; P = 0.029) and high percentage of tumor involvement (OR 1.56; P = 0.047). In a Kaplan-Meier curve, a trend was identified that patients with ED had higher incidence of BCR than men with normal EF (P = 0.091). Moreover, using a multivariate Cox model, higher preoperative EF was negatively associated with BCR (HR 0.99; P = 0.014).
Conclusions. These results suggest that the likelihood for adverse pathological outcomes as well as BCR following prostatectomy is higher among men with preoperative ED, though these results require validation in larger datasets. The present study indicates that preoperative ED might be a surrogate for adverse prostate cancer outcomes following RP. Kimura M, Bañez LL, Gerber L, Qi J, Tsivian M, Freedland SJ, Satoh T, Polascik TJ, Baba S, and Moul JW. Association between preoperative erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer features—An analysis from the Duke Prostate Center Database. J Sex Med 12;9:1174–1181.