Get access

The Tragedy of Human Trafficking: Competing Theories and European Evidence

Authors


  • We are thankful to Lyn Boyd-Judson, Laurie Brand, Maya Eichler, Milena Gueorguieva, Yesim Ince, Abigail Ruane, Zeynep Sahin, Laura Sjoberg, Jenifer Whitten-Woodring, and two anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments on earlier drafts of this paper, which greatly contributed to improving the manuscript.

Abstract

Marinova, Nadejda K. and Patrick James. (2012) The Tragedy of Human Trafficking: Competing Theories and European Evidence. Foreign Policy Analysis, doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00162.x

This paper explores an issue that is both domestic and international: whether legalization of prostitution leads to an increase in human trafficking. For both theory and public policy, this is an important query to answer, with implications beyond the cases in question. The principal domains of investigation are Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands. These states subscribe to UN, EU, Council of Europe and OSCE agreements and are located in the same geographic region, yet have adopted opposite approaches to prostitution. The Netherlands and Germany legalized prostitution in 2000 and 2002, respectively. Sweden outlawed it in 1999 and imposed criminal penalties for the purchase of illicit sex. The preceding characteristics make these states ideal for a comparative exercise in the context of competing perspectives on human trafficking and legalized prostitution. We find that legalization leads to an increase in trafficking. The dynamics of trafficking are also associated with numerous factors, among which the most critical are government efforts specifically targeting the activity in the field of law enforcement. Implications for theory and public policy are offered, along with ideas about future research.

Ancillary