A META-ANALYSIS OF SELF-SUPERVISOR, SELF-PEER, AND PEER-SUPERVISOR RATINGS
Version of Record online: 7 DEC 2006
Volume 41, Issue 1, pages 43–62, March 1988
How to Cite
HARRIS, M. M. and SCHAUBROECK, J. (1988), A META-ANALYSIS OF SELF-SUPERVISOR, SELF-PEER, AND PEER-SUPERVISOR RATINGS. Personnel Psychology, 41: 43–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x
- Issue online: 7 DEC 2006
- Version of Record online: 7 DEC 2006
Reviews of self–supervisor, self–peer, and peer–supervisor ratings have generally concluded that there is at best a modest correlation between different rating sources. Nevertheless, there has been much inconsistency across studies. Accordingly, a meta-analysis was conducted. The results indicated a relatively high correlation between peer and supervisor ratings (ρ= .62) but only a moderate correlation between self-supervisor (ρ= .35) and self-peer ratings (ρ= .36). While rating format (dimensional versus global) and rating scale (trait versus behavioral) had little impact as moderators, job type (managerial/professional versus blue-collar/service) did seem to moderate self-peer and self-supervisor ratings.