We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments provided by Angelo DeNisi, Jennifer George, two anonymous reviewers, and the editor on earlier drafts of this article, and the statistical advice offered by Fritz Drasgow, Kevin Hallock, and Wallace Hendricks. We also thank Michelle Arthur for her help with data preparation. This research was supported in part by a faculty research mini-grant from Texas A&M University.
CHINESE AND AMERICAN MANAGERS' COMPENSATION AWARD DECISIONS: A COMPARATIVE POLICY-CAPTURING STUDY
Article first published online: 7 DEC 2006
Volume 54, Issue 1, pages 115–145, March 2001
How to Cite
ZHOU, J. and MARTOCCHIO, J. J. (2001), CHINESE AND AMERICAN MANAGERS' COMPENSATION AWARD DECISIONS: A COMPARATIVE POLICY-CAPTURING STUDY. Personnel Psychology, 54: 115–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00088.x
- Issue published online: 7 DEC 2006
- Article first published online: 7 DEC 2006
Using a policy-capturing approach, in this study we examined the extent to which 4 variables (work performance, relationship with coworkers, relationship with managers, and personal needs) affect the process through which Chinese and American managers make 2 types of compensation award decisions (bonus amounts and nonmonetary recognition). Results showed that, compared with their American counterparts, Chinese managers (a) put less emphasis on work performance when making bonus decisions; (b) put more emphasis on relationship with coworkers when making nonmonetary decisions; (c) put more emphasis on relationship with managers when making nonmonetary award decisions; and (d) put more emphasis on personal needs when making bonus decisions. We discussed the implications of these results for future research and practice.