SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Benjamin D. McLarty, Daniel S. Whitman, A Dispositional Approach to Applicant Reactions: Examining Core Self-Evaluations, Behavioral Intentions, and Fairness Perceptions, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2016, 31, 1, 141

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Janneke K. Oostrom, Britt De Soete, Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of Cognitive Ability Tests: The explanatory role of self-serving attributions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2016, 24, 1
  3. 3
    Valentina Bruk-Lee, Julie Lanz, Erica N. Drew, Chris Coughlin, Pamela Levine, Kathy Tuzinski, Kimberly Wrenn, Examining Applicant Reactions to Different Media Types in Character-based Simulations for Employee Selection, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2016, 24, 1
  4. 4
    Rachel E. Frieder, Chad H. Van Iddekinge, Patrick H. Raymark, How quickly do interviewers reach decisions? An examination of interviewers' decision-making time across applicants, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2016, 89, 2
  5. 5
    Crystal M. Harold, Brian C. Holtz, Brian K. Griepentrog, Lindsey M. Brewer, Sean M. Marsh, Investigating the Effects of Applicant Justice Perceptions on Job Offer Acceptance, Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69, 1
  6. 6
    Kristin R. Sanderson, Valentina Bruk-Lee, Chockalingam Viswesvaran, Sara Gutierrez, Tracy Kantrowitz, Investigating the nomological network of multitasking ability in a field sample, Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, 91, 52

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Fiona Patterson, Lara Zibarras, Vicki Ashworth, Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100, Medical Teacher, 2016, 38, 1, 3

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Khaldoun I. Ababneh, Mohammed A. Al-Waqfi, The role of privacy invasion and fairness in understanding job applicant reactions to potentially inappropriate/discriminatory interview questions, Personnel Review, 2016, 45, 2, 392

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Pia V. Ingold, Martin Kleinmann, Cornelius J. König, Klaus G. Melchers, Transparency of Assessment Centers: Lower Criterion-related Validity but Greater Opportunity to Perform?, Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69, 2
  10. 10
    Michael B. Armstrong, Richard N. Landers, Andrew B. Collmus, Emerging Research and Trends in Gamification, 2016,

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Hege H. Bye, Gro M. Sandal, Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2015,

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Daniela Lohaus, Christian Rietz, Arbeitgeberattraktivität, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 2015, 59, 2, 70

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Brian W. Swider, Ryan D. Zimmerman, Steven D. Charlier, Abigail J. Pierotti, Deep-level and surface-level individual differences and applicant attraction to organizations: A meta-analysis, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2015, 88, 73

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Scott Highhouse, Thaddeus B. Rada, Different Worldviews Explain Perceived Effectiveness of Different Employment Tests, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2015, 23, 2
  15. 15
    Yael Brender-Ilan, Zachary Sheaffer, Do Immigrants Have Different Procedural Justice Perceptions of Personnel Selection methods? The case of native Israelis and immigrants from the former Soviet Union, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2015, 23, 1
  16. 16
    J. William Stoughton, Lori Foster Thompson, Adam W. Meade, Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2015, 30, 1, 73

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Richard G. Brody, Frank S. Perri, Harry J. Van Buren, Further Beyond the Basic Background Check: Predicting Future Unethical Behavior, Business and Society Review, 2015, 120, 4
  18. 18
    Nancy T. Tippins, Technology and Assessment in Selection, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2015, 2, 1, 551

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Lara D. Zibarras, Fiona Patterson, The Role of Job Relatedness and Self-efficacy in Applicant Perceptions of Fairness in a High-stakes Selection Setting, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2015, 23, 4
  20. 20
    Aura Nortomaa, To Ordain or not to Ordain? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on How Ministerial Candidates and Dioceses Use Psychological Assessment in Ordination Process, Journal of Empirical Theology, 2015, 28, 2, 242

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Stephanie L. Black, Dianna L. Stone, Andrew F. Johnson, Use of Social Networking Websites on Applicants’ Privacy, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2015, 27, 2, 115

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Lonneke Dubbelt, Janneke K. Oostrom, Annemarie M. F. Hiemstra, Joost P. L. Modderman, Validation of a Digital Work Simulation to Assess Machiavellianism and Compliant Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 130, 3, 619

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Filip Lievens, Britt De Soete, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015,

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Adrian Furnham, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015,

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Sylvia G. Roch, Vipanchi Mishra, Eugene Trombini, Does Selection Measure Scoring Influence Motivation: One size fits all?, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2014, 22, 1
  26. 26
    Natalia Merkulova, Klaus G. Melchers, Martin Kleinmann, Hubert Annen, Tibor Szvircsev Tresch, Effects of Individual Differences on Applicant Perceptions of an Operational Assessment Center, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2014, 22, 4
  27. 27
    Daniel S. Whitman, Eyran Kraus, David L. Van Rooy, Emotional Intelligence among Black and White Job Applicants: Examining differences in test performance and test reactions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2014, 22, 2
  28. 28
    Patrick E. Downes, Daejeong Choi, Employee reactions to pay dispersion: A typology of existing research, Human Resource Management Review, 2014, 24, 1, 53

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    R. Blake Jelley, Julie M. McCarthy, Examining a Strategy for Improving Candidate Perceptions of Test Fairness, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2014, 29, 2, 68

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Khaldoun I. Ababneh, Rick D. Hackett, Aaron C. H. Schat, The Role of Attributions and Fairness in Understanding Job Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures and Decisions, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2014, 29, 1, 111

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Annette Burgess, Chris Roberts, Tyler Clark, Karyn Mossman, The social validity of a national assessment centre for selection into general practice training, BMC Medical Education, 2014, 14, 1

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Priyanko Guchait, Tanya Ruetzler, Jim Taylor, Nicole Toldi, Video interviewing: A potential selection tool for hospitality managers – A study to understand applicant perspective, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2014, 36, 90

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Professor Fernando Robles, Greg J. Sears, Haiyan Zhang, Willi H. Wiesner, Rick D. Hackett, Yufei Yuan, A comparative assessment of videoconference and face-to-face employment interviews, Management Decision, 2013, 51, 8, 1733

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Philip L. Roth, Allen I. Huffcutt, A Meta-Analysis of Interviews and Cognitive Ability, Journal of Personnel Psychology, 2013, 12, 4, 157

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Thomas W. Koenig, Samuel K. Parrish, Carol A. Terregino, Joy P. Williams, Dana M. Dunleavy, Joseph M. Volsch, Core Personal Competencies Important to Entering Students’ Success in Medical School, Academic Medicine, 2013, 88, 5, 603

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Laurence Marzucco, Isabelle Hansez, Etude des perceptions d’équité des candidats dans une situation de sélection: influence de la justice procédurale et distributive, Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 2013, 19, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Udo Konradt, Tim Warszta, Thomas Ellwart, Fairness Perceptions in Web-based Selection: Impact on applicants’ pursuit intentions, recommendation intentions, and intentions to reapply, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2013, 21, 2
  38. 38
    Qingquing Liu, Juan M. Madera, General Mental Ability and Personality Selection Tests: Applicant Perceptions of Fairness and Validity in the Hospitality Industry, Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 2013, 12, 3, 259

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Eugene J. Kutcher, Jennifer D. Bragger, Jamie L. Masco, How Interviewees Consider Content and Context Cues to Person–Organization Fit, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2013, 21, 3
  40. 40
    Janneke K. Oostrom, Dimitri van der Linden, Marise Ph. Born, Henk T. van der Molen, New technology in personnel selection: How recruiter characteristics affect the adoption of new selection technology, Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29, 6, 2404

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Laura Honkaniemi, Taru Feldt, Riitta-Leena Metsäpelto, Asko Tolvanen, Personality Types and Applicant Reactions in Real-life Selection, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2013, 21, 1
  42. 42
    Philip Bobko, Philip L. Roth, Reviewing, Categorizing, and Analyzing the Literature on Black–White Mean Differences for Predictors of Job Performance: Verifying Some perceptions and Updating/Correcting Others, Personnel Psychology, 2013, 66, 1
  43. 43
    Nils Benit, Renate Soellner, Scientist-practitioner gap in Deutschland: Eine empirische Studie am Beispiel psychologischer Testverfahren, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 2013, 57, 3, 145

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Sonja Schinkel, Annelies Vianen, Dirk Dierendonck, Selection Fairness and Outcomes: A field study of interactive effects on applicant reactions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2013, 21, 1
  45. 45
    James A. Grand, Juliya Golubovich, Ann Marie Ryan, Neal Schmitt, The detection and influence of problematic item content in ability tests: An examination of sensitivity review practices for personnel selection test development, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2013, 121, 2, 158

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Anthony C. Klotz, Serge P. Motta Veiga, M. Ronald Buckley, Mark B. Gavin, The role of trustworthiness in recruitment and selection: A review and guide for future research, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34, S1
  47. 47
    Hao Zhao, Turning small business interns into applicants: The mediating role of perceived justice, Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, 28, 3, 443

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Tanya Bondarouk, Huub J. M. Ruël, Paul Timmermans, Software Development Techniques for Constructive Information Systems Design, 2013,

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Dragos Iliescu, Alexandra Ilie, Dan Ispas, Andrei Ion, Emotional Intelligence in Personnel Selection: Applicant reactions, criterion, and incremental validity, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 3
  50. 50
    Linchi Kwok, Charlie R. Adams, Du Feng, A comparison of graduating seniors who receive job offers and those who do not according to hospitality recruiters’ selection criteria, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2012, 31, 2, 500

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Janneke K. Oostrom, Lineke Bos-Broekema, Alec W. Serlie, Marise Ph. Born, Henk T. van der Molen, A Field Study of Pretest and Posttest Reactions to a Paper-and-Pencil and a Computerized In-Basket Exercise, Human Performance, 2012, 25, 2, 95

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Jonathan A. Shaffer, Bennett E. Postlethwaite, A Matter of Context: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relative Validity of Contextualized and Noncontextualized Personality Measures, Personnel Psychology, 2012, 65, 3
  53. 53
    Stephen M. Colarelli, Matthew J. Monnot, George F. Ronan, Anne M. Roscoe, Administrative Assumptions in Top-Down Selection: A Test in Graduate School Admission Decisions, Applied Psychology, 2012, 61, 3
  54. 54
    Neil Anderson, Sara Ahmed, Ana Cristina Costa, Applicant Reactions in Saudi Arabia: Organizational attractiveness and core-self evaluation, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 2
  55. 55
    Thu G. Hoang, Donald M. Truxillo, Berrin Erdogan, Talya N. Bauer, Cross-cultural Examination of Applicant Reactions to Selection Methods: United States and Vietnam, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 2
  56. 56
    Yenming Zhang, Qingjuan Wang, Rick D. Hackett, Xun Cui, Yiming Zhang, Cultural differences and applicants' procedural fairness perceptions, Chinese Management Studies, 2012, 6, 2, 350

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    Fiona Patterson, Filip Lievens, Máire Kerrin, Lara Zibarras, Bernd Carette, Designing Selection Systems for Medicine: The importance of balancing predictive and political validity in high-stakes selection contexts, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 4
  58. 58
    Thomas Li-Ping Tang, Detecting Honest People’s Lies in Handwriting, Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 106, 4, 389

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    Gary W. Giumetti, Evan F. Sinar, Don't You Know Me Well Enough Yet? Comparing Reactions of Internal and External Candidates to Employment Testing, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 2
  60. 60
    Meinald T. Thielsch, Lisa Träumer, Leoni Pytlik, E-recruiting and fairness: the applicant’s point of view, Information Technology and Management, 2012, 13, 2, 59

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Fiona Patterson, Victoria Ashworth, Lara Zibarras, Philippa Coan, Maire Kerrin, Paul O’Neill, Evaluations of situational judgement tests to assess non-academic attributes in selection, Medical Education, 2012, 46, 9
  62. 62
    Annemarie M. F. Hiemstra, Eva Derous, Alec W. Serlie, Marise Ph. Born, Fairness Perceptions of Video Resumes among Ethnically Diverse Applicants, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 4
  63. 63
    Jasmine Snyder, Comila Shahani-Denning, Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: A look at professionals in Mumbai, India, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 3
  64. 64
    Jennifer Z. Gillespie, Ann Marie Ryan, Gender-Based Preferential Selection: Influences of Perceptions of Procedurally Unfair Advantage on Performance and Self-Evaluations, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012, 42,
  65. 65
    Marius Claus Wehner, Angelo Giardini, Rüdiger Kabst, Graduates' reactions to recruitment process outsourcing: A scenario-based study, Human Resource Management, 2012, 51, 4
  66. 66
    Leehu Zysberg, Hope in Personnel Selection, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 1
  67. 67
    D. Villani, C. Repetto, P. Cipresso, G. Riva, May I experience more presence in doing the same thing in virtual reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview, Interacting with Computers, 2012, 24, 4, 265

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Krista L. Uggerslev, Neil E. Fassina, David Kraichy, Recruiting Through the Stages: A Meta-Analytic Test of Predictors of Applicant Attraction at Different Stages of the Recruiting Process, Personnel Psychology, 2012, 65, 3
  69. 69
    JAMES W. BECK, PHILIP T. WALMSLEY, Selection Ratio and Employee Retention as Antecedents of Competitive Advantage, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2012, 5, 1
  70. 70
    Ross Slovensky, William H. Ross, Should human resource managers use social media to screen job applicants? Managerial and legal issues in the USA, info, 2012, 14, 1, 55

    CrossRef

  71. 71
    Brigitte Geenen, Karin Proost, Bert Schreurs, Marius van Dijke, Eva Derous, Karel De Witte, Jasper von Grumbkow, The influence of general beliefs on the formation of justice expectations, Career Development International, 2012, 17, 1, 67

    CrossRef

  72. 72
    Brigitte Geenen, Karin Proost, Marius Dijke, Karel Witte, Jasper von Grumbkow, The Role of Affect in the Relationship Between Distributive Justice Expectations and Applicants' Recommendation and Litigation Intentions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 4
  73. 73
    Matthew C. Reeder, Charlotte L. Powers, Ann Marie Ryan, Robert E. Gibby, The Role of Person Characteristics in Perceptions of the Validity of Cognitive Ability Testing, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2012, 20, 1
  74. 74
    Juan M. Madera, Using social networking websites as a selection tool: The role of selection process fairness and job pursuit intentions, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2012, 31, 4, 1276

    CrossRef

  75. 75
    Chris W. Wright, Chris J. Sablynski, Todd M. Manson, Steven Oshiro, Why Are Manhole Covers Round? A Laboratory Study of Reactions to Puzzle Interviews, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012, 42, 11
  76. 76
    I. M. Jawahar, Gerald R. Ferris, A Longitudinal Investigation of Task and Contextual Performance Influences on Promotability Judgments, Human Performance, 2011, 24, 3, 251

    CrossRef

  77. 77
    Sow Hup Chan, Oi Mei Kuok, A Study of Human Resources Recruitment, Selection, and Retention Issues in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry in Macau, Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 2011, 10, 4, 421

    CrossRef

  78. 78
    Allen I. Huffcutt, An Empirical Review of the Employment Interview Construct Literature, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 1
  79. 79
    LAURA HONKANIEMI, ASKO TOLVANEN, TARU FELDT, Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2011, 52, 4
  80. 80
    Sonja Schinkel, Dirk van Dierendonck, Annelies van Vianen, Ann Marie Ryan, Applicant Reactions to Rejection, Journal of Personnel Psychology, 2011, 10, 4, 146

    CrossRef

  81. 81
    Jana Janssen, Patrick A. Müller, Rainer Greifeneder, Cognitive processes in procedural justice judgments: The role of ease-of-retrieval, uncertainty, and experience, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32, 5
  82. 82
    Ioannis Nikolaou, Core processes and applicant reactions to the employment interview: an exploratory study in Greece, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011, 22, 10, 2185

    CrossRef

  83. 83
    Martin Ostapczuk, Jochen Musch, Walter Lieberei, Der „Analytische Test“: Validierung eines neuen eignungsdiagnostischen Instruments zur Erfassung von schlussfolgerndem Denken, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 2011, 55, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  84. 84
    Sophia Anastasiou, Georgios Papakonstantinou, Elements of gender-related variability in the selection of school advisors in Greece, Journal of Educational Administration, 2011, 49, 3, 314

    CrossRef

  85. 85
    Fatma Küskü, Berk M. Ataman, Employment interview satisfaction of applicants within the context of a developing country: the case of Turkey, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2011, 22, 11, 2463

    CrossRef

  86. 86
    Fiona Patterson, Lara D. Zibarras, Exploring the Construct of Perceived Job Discrimination in Selection, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 3
  87. 87
    Linchi Kwok, Charlie R. Adams, Margaret A. (Peggie) Price, Factors Influencing Hospitality Recruiters’ Hiring Decisions in College Recruiting, Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 2011, 10, 4, 372

    CrossRef

  88. 88
    CHARLES A. SCHERBAUM, LISE M. SAARI, Identified Employee Surveys: Where Do We Go From Here?, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 4, 4
  89. 89
    JOY FISHER HAZUCHA, ANURADHA RAMESH, MAYNARD GOFF, STU CRANDELL, CHARLOTTE GERSTNER, ELAINE SLOAN, JURGEN BANK, PAUL VAN KATWYK, Individual Psychological Assessment: The Poster Child of Blended Science and Practice, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 4, 3
  90. 90
    Dalia L. Diab, Shuang-Yueh Pui, Maya Yankelevich, Scott Highhouse, Lay Perceptions of Selection Decision Aids in US and Non-US Samples, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 2
  91. 91
    BERRIN ERDOGAN, TALYA N. BAUER, JOSÉ MARÍA PEIRÓ, DONALD M. TRUXILLO, Overqualified Employees: Making the Best of a Potentially Bad Situation for Individuals and Organizations, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 4, 2
  92. 92
    Neil Anderson, Perceived Job Discrimination: Going beyond a science of mean effects, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 3
  93. 93
    Neil Anderson, Perceived Job Discrimination: Toward a model of applicant propensity to case initiation in selection, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 3
  94. 94
    Adrian Furnham, Chris J. Jackson, Practitioner reactions to work-related psychological tests, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2011, 26, 7, 549

    CrossRef

  95. 95
    Anthony Celani, Parbudyal Singh, Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes, Personnel Review, 2011, 40, 2, 222

    CrossRef

  96. 96
    JOHN J. SUMANTH, DANIEL M. CABLE, STATUS AND ORGANIZATIONAL ENTRY: HOW ORGANIZATIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL STATUS AFFECT JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS OF HIRING SYSTEMS, Personnel Psychology, 2011, 64, 4
  97. 97
    Cornelius J. König, Eva Jöri, Patrizia Knüsel, The Amazing Diversity of Thought: A Qualitative Study on How Human Resource Practitioners Perceive Selection Procedures, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2011, 26, 4, 437

    CrossRef

  98. 98
    Eveline Schollaert, Filip Lievens, The Use of Role-Player Prompts in Assessment Center Exercises, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 2
  99. 99
    Allen I. Huffcutt, Chad H. Van Iddekinge, Philip L. Roth, Understanding applicant behavior in employment interviews: A theoretical model of interviewee performance, Human Resource Management Review, 2011,

    CrossRef

  100. 100
    Sally A. Carless, Kate Hetherington, Understanding the Applicant Recruitment Experience: Does timeliness matter?, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2011, 19, 1
  101. 101
    Chien-Cheng Chen, Irene Wen-Fen Yang, Wei-Chih Lin, Applicant impression management in job interview: The moderating role of interviewer affectivity, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2010, 83, 3
  102. 102
    Neil Anderson, Jesús F. Salgado, Ute R. Hülsheger, Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 3
  103. 103
    Janneke K. Oostrom, Marise Ph. Born, Alec W. Serlie, Henk T. Van Der Molen, Effects of Individual Differences on the Perceived Job Relatedness of a Cognitive Ability Test and a Multimedia Situational Judgment Test, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 4
  104. 104
    ANNE KANERVA, JOHANNA LAMMINTAKANEN, TUULA KIVINEN, Experiences of the fairness of recruitment from unsuccessful applicants in the field of nursing, Journal of Nursing Management, 2010, 18, 3
  105. 105
    Greg L. Stewart, Todd C. Darnold, Ryan D. Zimmerman, Laura Parks, Susan L. Dustin, Exploring how response distortion of personality measures affects individuals, Personality and Individual Differences, 2010, 49, 6, 622

    CrossRef

  106. 106
    Reyhan Bilgiç, Gizem Acarlar, Fairness Perceptions of Selection Instruments Used in Turkey, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 2
  107. 107
    Dan Ispas, Alexandra Ilie, Dragos Iliescu, Russell E. Johnson, Michael M. Harris, Fairness Reactions to Selection Methods: A Romanian study, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 1
  108. 108
    JONAS W. B. LANG, MARTIN KERSTING, UTE R. HÜLSHEGER, JESSICA LANG, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, NARROWER COGNITIVE ABILITIES, AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE NESTED-FACTORS MODEL OF COGNITIVE ABILITIES, Personnel Psychology, 2010, 63, 3
  109. 109
    James A. Grand, Ann Marie Ryan, Neal Schmitt, Jillian Hmurovic, How Far Does Stereotype Threat Reach? The Potential Detriment of Face Validity in Cognitive Ability Testing, Human Performance, 2010, 24, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  110. 110
    Benjamin M. Walsh, Michael D. Tuller, Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, Russell A. Matthews, Investigating the Moderating Role of Cultural Practices on the Effect of Selection Fairness Perceptions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 4
  111. 111
    Cornelius J. König, Ute-Christine Klehe, Matthias Berchtold, Martin Kleinmann, Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 1
  112. 112
    John Alban-Metcalfe, Beverly Alimo-Metcalfe, Miranda Hughes, Selection of chairs of primary care trusts, Journal of Health Organization and Management, 2010, 24, 1, 57

    CrossRef

  113. 113
    Shawn Komar, Jennifer A. Komar, Chet Robie, Simon Taggar, Speeding Personality Measures to Reduce Faking, Journal of Personnel Psychology, 2010, 9, 3, 126

    CrossRef

  114. 114
    Sara Banki, Gary P. Latham, The Criterion-Related Validities and Perceived Fairness of the Situational Interview and the Situational Judgment Test in an Iranian Organisation, Applied Psychology, 2010, 59, 1
  115. 115
    WILLIAM J. BECKER, TERRY CONNOLLY, JEREL E. SLAUGHTER, THE EFFECT OF JOB OFFER TIMING ON OFFER ACCEPTANCE, PERFORMANCE, AND TURNOVER, Personnel Psychology, 2010, 63, 1
  116. 116
    Bert Schreurs, Eva Derous, Karin Proost, Karel De Witte, The Relation between Selection Expectations, Perceptions and Organizational Attraction: A test of competing models, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 4
  117. 117
    Gerard H. Seijts, Ivy Kyei-Poku, The Role of Situational Interviews in Fostering Positive Reactions to Selection Decisions, Applied Psychology, 2010, 59, 3
  118. 118
    Philip L. Roth, Maury A. Buster, Janet Barnes-Farrell, Work Sample Exams and Gender Adverse Impact Potential: The influence of self-concept, social skills, and written skills, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, 18, 2
  119. You have free access to this content119
    Ute R. Hülsheger, Neil Anderson, Applicant Perspectives in Selection: Going beyond preference reactions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009, 17, 4
  120. 120
    Tasha L. Eurich, Diana E. Krause, Konstantin Cigularov, George C. Thornton, Assessment Centers: Current Practices in the United States, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2009, 24, 4, 387

    CrossRef

  121. 121
    Filip Lievens, Assessment centres: A tale about dimensions, exercises, and dancing bears, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 18, 1, 102

    CrossRef

  122. 122
    KEVIN R. MURPHY, Content Validation Is Useful for Many Things, but Validity Isn't One of Them, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2, 4
  123. 123
    Hella Sylva, Stefan T. Mol, E-Recruitment: A study into applicant perceptions of an online application system, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009, 17, 3
  124. 124
    Donald M. Truxillo, Todd E. Bodner, Marilena Bertolino, Talya N. Bauer, Clayton A. Yonce, Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A meta-analytic review, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009, 17, 4
  125. 125
    Ann Marie Ryan, Anthony S. Boyce, Sonia Ghumman, Dustin Jundt, Gordon Schmidt, Robert Gibby, Going Global: Cultural Values and Perceptions of Selection Procedures, Applied Psychology, 2009, 58, 4
  126. 126
    Matthew J. Basham, David L. Stader, Holly N. Bishop, How “Pathetic” is Your Hiring Process? An Application of the Lessig “Pathetic Dot” Model to Educational Hiring Practices, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2009, 33, 3-4, 363

    CrossRef

  127. 127
    Marsha L. Nielsen, Kristine M. Kuhn, Late Payments and Leery Applicants: Credit Checks as a Selection Test, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2009, 21, 2, 115

    CrossRef

  128. 128
    Sonia Laberon, Marilou Bruchon-Schweitzer, Les pratiques d’evaluation utilisees dans les structures de conseil en recrutement : quelques determinants, Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 2009, 15, 2, 111

    CrossRef

  129. 129
    Eva Derous, Bert Schreurs, Modeling the structure of applicant reactions: An empirical study within the Belgian military., Military Psychology, 2009, 21, 1, 40

    CrossRef

  130. 130
    DONALD M. TRUXILLO, TALYA N. BAUER, MICHAEL A. CAMPION, Organizational Justice Interventions: Practicalities, Concerns, and Potential, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2, 2
  131. 131
    Bert Schreurs, Eva Derous, Edwin A. J. Van Hooft, Karin Proost, Karel De Witte, Predicting applicants' job pursuit behavior from their selection expectations: the mediating role of the theory of planned behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2009, 30, 6
  132. 132
    JULIE McCARTHY, COREEN HRABLUIK, R. BLAKE JELLEY, PROGRESSION THROUGH THE RANKS: ASSESSING EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO HIGH-STAKES EMPLOYMENT TESTING, Personnel Psychology, 2009, 62, 4
  133. 133
    Deborah K. Ford, Donald M. Truxillo, Talya N. Bauer, Rejected But Still There: Shifting the focus in applicant reactions to the promotional context, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009, 17, 4
  134. 134
    Gerrit H.F. Hirschfeld, Gavin T.L. Brown, Students’ Conceptions of Assessment, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2009, 25, 1, 30

    CrossRef

  135. 135
    CHAD H. VAN IDDEKINGE, GERALD R. FERRIS, TONIA S. HEFFNER, TEST OF A MULTISTAGE MODEL OF DISTAL AND PROXIMAL ANTECEDENTS OF LEADER PERFORMANCE, Personnel Psychology, 2009, 62, 3
  136. 136
    Therese Macan, The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research, Human Resource Management Review, 2009, 19, 3, 203

    CrossRef

  137. 137
    Frederik Anseel, Filip Lievens, The Mediating Role of Feedback Acceptance in the Relationship between Feedback and Attitudinal and Performance Outcomes, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009, 17, 4
  138. 138
    KENNETH PEARLMAN, Unproctored Internet Testing: Practical, Legal, and Ethical Concerns, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2009, 2, 1
  139. 139
    Frederick P. Morgeson, Michael A. Campion, Julia Levashina, Why Don't You Just Show Me? Performance interviews for skill-based promotions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009, 17, 2
  140. 140
    Filip Lievens, Robert P. Tett, Deidra J. Schleicher, 2009,

    CrossRef

  141. 141
    Melanie Sauerland, Eignungsdiagnostik im Wandel, 2009,

    CrossRef

  142. 142
    Stephan Stegt, Eignungsdiagnostik im Wandel, 2009,

    CrossRef

  143. 143
    Charlie L. Reeve, Silvia Bonaccio, Jennifer E. Charles, A policy-capturing study of the contextual antecedents of test anxiety, Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 45, 3, 243

    CrossRef

  144. 144
    Philip H. Siegel, Mike Schraeder, Rodger Morrison, A Taxonomy of Equity Factors, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008, 38, 1
  145. 145
    Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Mark P. Healey, Cognition in Organizations, Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59, 1, 387

    CrossRef

  146. 146
    Patrick D. Converse, Frederick L. Oswald, Anna Imus, Cynthia Hedricks, Radha Roy, Hilary Butera, Comparing Personality Test Formats and Warnings: Effects on criterion-related validity and test-taker reactions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2008, 16, 2
  147. 147
    Neil Anderson, Carlijn Witvliet, Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An international comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2008, 16, 1
  148. 148
    Adrian Furnham, HR Professionals' Beliefs About, and Knowledge of, Assessment Techniques and Psychometric Tests, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2008, 16, 3
  149. 149
    Anthony Celani, Sabrina Deutsch-Salamon, Parbudyal Singh, In justice we trust: A model of the role of trust in the organization in applicant reactions to the selection process, Human Resource Management Review, 2008, 18, 2, 63

    CrossRef

  150. 150
    Neil E. Fassina, David A. Jones, Krista L. Uggerslev, Meta-analytic tests of relationships between organizational justice and citizenship behavior: testing agent-system and shared-variance models, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, 29, 6
  151. 151
    Ann Marie Ryan, Megan Huth, Not much more than platitudes? A critical look at the utility of applicant reactions research, Human Resource Management Review, 2008, 18, 3, 119

    CrossRef

  152. 152
    Paul R. Sackett, Filip Lievens, Personnel Selection, Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59, 1, 419

    CrossRef

  153. 153
    John Bret Becton, Hubert S. Feild, William F. Giles, Allison Jones-Farmer, Racial differences in promotion candidate performance and reactions to selection procedures: a field study in a diverse top-management context, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, 29, 3
  154. 154
    Filip Lievens, Helga Peeters, Eveline Schollaert, Situational judgment tests: a review of recent research, Personnel Review, 2008, 37, 4, 426

    CrossRef

  155. 155
    SCOTT HIGHHOUSE, Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2008, 1, 3
  156. 156
    ROBERT E. PLOYHART, BRIAN C. HOLTZ, THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RACIOETHNIC AND SEX SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN SELECTION, Personnel Psychology, 2008, 61, 1
  157. 157
    Kristine M. Kuhn, Marsha L. Nielsen, Understanding Applicant Reactions to Credit Checks: Uncertainty, information effects and individual differences, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2008, 16, 4
  158. 158
    Crystal M. Harold, Robert E. Ployhart, What do applicants want? Examining changes in attribute judgments over time, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2008, 81, 2
  159. 159
    CHRISTOPHER M. BERRY, PAUL R. SACKETT, SHELLY WIEMANN, A REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTEGRITY TEST RESEARCH, Personnel Psychology, 2007, 60, 2
  160. 160
    FREDERICK P. MORGESON, MICHAEL A. CAMPION, ROBERT L. DIPBOYE, JOHN R. HOLLENBECK, KEVIN MURPHY, NEAL SCHMITT, ARE WE GETTING FOOLED AGAIN? COMING TO TERMS WITH LIMITATIONS IN THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION, Personnel Psychology, 2007, 60, 4
  161. 161
    David M. LaHuis, Charles N. MacLane, Bradley R. Schlessman, Do Applicants' Perceptions Matter? Investigating Reapplication Behavior Using Fairness Theory, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2007, 15, 4
  162. 162
    Ioannis Nikolaou, Timothy A. Judge, Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece: The role of core self-evaluations, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2007, 15, 2
  163. 163
    Marilena Bertolino, Dirk D. Steiner, Fairness Reactions to Selection Methods: An Italian study, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2007, 15, 2
  164. 164
    Bradford S. Bell, J. Kevin Ford, Reactions to skill assessment: The forgotten factor in explaining motivation to learn, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2007, 18, 1
  165. 165
    Alan M. Saks, Krista L. Uggerslev, Neil E. Fassina, Socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: A meta-analytic review and test of a model, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2007, 70, 3, 413

    CrossRef

  166. 166
    Florence Rolland, Dirk D. Steiner, Test-Taker Reactions to the Selection Process: Effects of Outcome Favorability, Explanations, and Voice on Fairness Perceptions, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2007, 37, 12
  167. 167
    Sally A. Carless, Amantha Imber, The Influence of Perceived Interviewer and Job and Organizational Characteristics on Applicant Attraction and Job Choice Intentions: The role of applicant anxiety, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2007, 15, 4
  168. 168
    Aryeh Lazar, Ahuva Zinger, Boris Lachterman, The influence of prefeedback selection justice on perceptions of overall procedural justice and organizational attractiveness in a real-life selection procedure, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2007, 16, 1, 94

    CrossRef

  169. 169
    Ann Howard, A commentary by Ann Howard., The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 2006, 9, 2, 201

    CrossRef

  170. 170
    Donald M. Truxillo, Talya N. Bauer, Michael A. Campion, Matthew E. Paronto, A Field Study of the Role of Big Five Personality in Applicant Perceptions of Selection Fairness, Self, and the Hiring Organization, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2006, 14, 3
  171. 171
    Bradford S. Bell, Darin Wiechmann, Ann Marie Ryan, Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system., Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91, 2, 455

    CrossRef

  172. 172
    Alan M. Saks, Julie M. McCarthy, Effects of discriminatory interview questions and gender on applicant reactions, Journal of Business and Psychology, 2006, 21, 2, 175

    CrossRef

  173. 173
    Neil Anderson, Vicki Goltsi, Negative Psychological Effects of Selection Methods: Construct Formulation and an Empirical Investigation into an Assessment Center, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2006, 14, 3
  174. 174
    Jürgen Hoyer, Uwe Ruhl, Denis Scholz, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Patients’ feedback after computer-assisted diagnostic interviews for mental disorders, Psychotherapy Research, 2006, 16, 3, 357

    CrossRef

  175. 175
    DEIDRA J. SCHLEICHER, VIJAYA VENKATARAMANI, FREDERICK P. MORGESON, MICHAEL A. CAMPION, SO YOU DIDN'T GET THE JOB … NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK? EXAMINING OPPORTUNITY-TO-PERFORM FAIRNESS PERCEPTIONS, Personnel Psychology, 2006, 59, 3
  176. 176
    Filip Lievens, The ITC Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing: Where Do We Go From Here?, International Journal of Testing, 2006, 6, 2, 189

    CrossRef

  177. 177
    Daniel M. Bagner, Michelle D. Harwood, Sheila M. Eyberg, Clinician's Handbook of Child Behavioral Assessment, 2006,

    CrossRef

  178. 178
    PHILIP L. ROTH, PHILIP BOBKO, LYNN A. McFARLAND, A META-ANALYSIS OF WORK SAMPLE TEST VALIDITY: UPDATING AND INTEGRATING SOME CLASSIC LITERATURE, Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58, 4
  179. 179
    Andrew N. Garman, Toni Lesowitz, Research Update: Interviewing Candidates for Leadership Roles., Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 2005, 57, 4, 266

    CrossRef

  180. 180
    James C. Wimbush, Spotlight on human resource management, Business Horizons, 2005, 48, 6, 463

    CrossRef

  181. 181
    Talya N. Bauer, Donald M. Truxillo, Kyle Mack, Ana B. Costa, Applicant Reactions to Technology-Based Selection: What We Know So Far,
  182. 182
    Nathan R. Kuncel, Jana Rigdon, Communicating Research Findings, Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition,
  183. 183
    Anne Marie Ryan, Elaine D. Pulakos, Conducting Meaningful Research in a Fast-Paced and Volatile World of Work: Challenges and Opportunities,
  184. 184
    Chockalingam Viswesvaran, Deniz S. Ones, Employee Selection in Times of Change,
  185. 185
    Jose M. Cortina, Joseph N. Luchman, Personnel Selection and Employee Performance, Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition,
  186. 186
    Todd C. Darnold, Sara L. Rynes, Recruitment and Job Choice Research: Same as It Ever Was?, Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition,
  187. 187
    References,
  188. 188
    Frank L. Schmidt, Select on Intelligence,
  189. 189
    Fiona Patterson, Eamonn Ferguson, Alec L Knight, Selection into Medical Education and Training,
  190. 190
    Chris D. Fluckinger, Andrea F. Snell, User Reactions to Personality Assessment,