SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Athearn HD 1998. Additional records and notes on the unionid fauna of the Gulf drainage of Alabama, Georgia and Florida. Occas. Pap. Mollusks Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. Univ. 5 (76): 465466.
  • Bogan AE & Hoeh WR 2000. On becoming cemented: evolutionary relationships among the genera in the freshwater bivalve family Etheriidae (Bivalvia: Unionoida). In: The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia. HarperEM, TaylorJD, & CrameJA, eds., pp. 159168. The Geological Society, London Special Paper No. 177.
  • Buhay JE, Serb JM, Dean CR, Parham Q, & Lydeard C 2002. Conservation genetics of two endangered unionid bivalve species, Epioblasma florentina walkeri and E. capsaeformis (Unionidae: Lampsilini). J. Molluscan Stud. 68: 385391.
  • Burch JB 1975. Freshwater Unionacean Clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacological Publications, Hamburg, Michigan. xviii+204 pp.
  • Clarke AH 1981. The Freshwater Molluscs of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museum of Canada, Ottawa. 446 pp.
  • Curole JP & Kocher TD 2002. Ancient sex-specific extension of the cytochrome c oxidase II gene in bivalves and the fidelity of doubly-uniparental inheritance. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 (8): 13231328.
  • Davis GM 1983. Relative roles of molecular genetics, anatomy, morphometrics and ecology in assessing relationships among North American Unionidae (Bivalvia). Ch. 12. In: Protein Polymorphism: Adaptive and Taxonomic Significance. OxfordGS & RollinsonD, eds., pp. 193222. Academic Press, New York.
  • Davis GM & Fuller SLH 1981. Genetic relationships among Recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America. Malacologia 20 (2): 217253 +2 appendices.
  • Dowton M & Austin AD 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy—the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51 (1): 1931.
  • Erixson P, Svennblad B, Britton T, & Oxelman B 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 52 (5): 665673.
  • Folmer O, Hoeh WR, Black MB, & Vrijenhoek RL 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3: 294299.
  • Frierson LS 1927. A Classified and Annotated Check List of the North American Naiades. Baylor University, Waco, TX. 111 pp.
  • Fuller SLH 1975. The systematic position of Cyrtonaias (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacol. Rev. 8: 8189.
  • Giribet G & Wheeler WC 2002. On bivalve phylogeny: a high-level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined morphology and DNA sequence data. Invertebr. Biol. 121 (4): 271324.
  • Goloboff P, Farris S, & Nixon K 2000. TNT (Tree analysis using New Technology) (BETA) ver. 1.0. Published by the authors, Tucumán, Argentina.
  • Goodrich C 1937. Goniobasis columbiensis Whiteaves. Nautilus 50: 8284.
  • Graf DL 2000. The Etherioidea revisited: a phylogenetic analysis of hyriid relationships (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Paleoheterodonta: Unionoida). Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 729: 121.
  • Graf DL 2002. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of two problematic freshwater mussel genera (Unio and Gonidea) and a re-evaluation of the classification of Neararctic Unionidae (Bivalvia: Palaeoheterodonta: Unionoida). J. Molluscan Stud. 68: 6571.
  • Graf DL & Ó Foighil D 2000a. The evolution of brooding characters among the freshwater pearly mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of North America. J. Molluscan Stud. 66 (2): 157170.
  • Graf DL & Ó Foighil D 2000b. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of 28S rDNA supports a Gondwanan origin for Australasian Hyriidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida). Vie et Milieu 50: 245254.
  • Haas F 1969. Superfamily Unionacea. In: Part N Mollusca 6 Bivalvia. Cox LR, Newell ND et al. In: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. MooreRC, ed., pp. N411N467. Geological Society of America, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS.
  • Hall TA 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 9598.
  • Hannibal H 1912. A synopsis of the recent and tertiary freshwater Mollusca of the Californian Province, based upon an ontogenetic classification. Proc. Malacol. Soc. 10 (2–3): 112211.
  • Hartman JH 1998. The biostratigraphy and paleontology of latest Cretaceous and Paleocene freshwater bivalves form the western Williston Basin, Montana, U.S.A. In: Bivalves: An Eon of Evolution. Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D. Newell. JohnstonPA & HaggartJW, eds., pp. 317345. University of Calgary Press, Calgary.
  • Heard WH & Guckert RH 1971. A re-evaluation of the Recent Unionacea (Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacologia 10: 333355.
  • Hoeh WR, Stewart DT, Sutherland BW, & Zouros E 1996. Multiple origins of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA lineages in bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Evolution 50 (6): 22762286.
  • Hoeh WR, Black MB, Gustafson R, Bogan AE, Lutz RA, & Vrijenhoek RC 1998. Testing alternative hypotheses of Neotrigonia (Bivalvia: Trigonioida) phylogenetic relationships using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I DNA sequences. Malacologia 40 (1–2): 267278.
  • Hoeh WR, Bogan AE, & Heard WH 2001. A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of morphological and reproductive characteristics in the Unionoida. Ch. 14. In: Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. BauerG & WächtlerK, eds., pp. 257280. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Hoeh WR, Bogan AE, Cummings KS, & Guttman SI 2002a. Evolutionary relationships among the higher taxa of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida): inferences on phylogeny and character evolution from analyses of DNA sequence data. Malacol. Rev. 31/32 (2): 123141.
  • Hoeh WR, Stewart DT, & Guttman SI 2002b. High fidelity of mitochondrial genome transmission under the doubly uniparental mode of inheritance in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Evolution 56 (11): 22522261.
  • Howells RG, Neck RW, & Murray HD 1996. Freshwater Mussels of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin. iv+218 pp.
  • Huang Y, Liu H, Wu X, & Ouyang S 2002. Testing the relationships of Chinese freshwater Unionidae (Bivalvia) based on analysis of partial mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequences. J. Molluscan Stud. 68: 359363.
  • Huelsenbeck JP & Ronquist F 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.
  • Huff SW, Campbell DC, Gustafson DL, Lydeard C, Altaba CR, & Giribet G 2004. Investigations into the phylogenetic relationships of the threatened freshwater pearl-mussels (Bivalvia, Unionoidea, Margaritiferidae) based on molecular data: implications for their taxonomy and biogeography. J Molluscan Stud. 70: 379388.
  • Von Ihering H 1901. The Unionidae of North America. Nautilus 15 (5): 5053.
  • King TL, Eackles MS, Gjetvaj B, & Hoeh WR 1999. Intraspecific phylogeography of Lasmigona subviridis (Bivalvia: Unionidae): conservation implications of range discontinuity. Mol. Ecol. 8 (12 Suppl. 1): S65S78.
  • Krebs RA, Vlasceanu RN, & Tevesz MJS 2003. An analysis of diversity in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Cuyahoga and Rocky River watersheds (Ohio, USA) based on the 16S rRNA gene. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 29 (2): 307316.
  • Lydeard C, Mulvey M, & Davis GM 1996. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351: 15931603.
  • Lydeard C, Minton RL, & Williams JD 2000. Prodigious polyphyly in imperiled freshwater pearly-mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae): a phylogenetic test of species and generic designations. In: The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia. HarperEM, TaylorJD, & CrameJA, eds., pp. 145158. The Geological Society, London Special Paper No. 177.
  • Lydeard C, Holznagel WE, Glaubrecht M, & Ponder WF 2002. Molecular Phylogeny of a circum-global, diverse gastropod superfamily (Cerithioidea: Mollusca: Caenogastropoda): pushing the deepest phylogenetic limits of mitochondrial LSU rDNA sequences. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 22 (3): 399406.
  • Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KS, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, & Thompson FG 2004. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. Bioscience 54 (4): 321330.
  • Machordom A, Araujo R, Erpenbeck D, & Ramos MA 2003. Phylogeography and conservation genetics of endangered European Margaritiferidae (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 78: 235252.
  • Makarenkov V, Legendre P, & Desdevises Y 2004. Modeling phylogenetic relationships using reticulated networks. Zool. Scripta 33 (1): 8996.
  • Malia MJ, Lipscomb DL, & Allard MW 2003. The misleading effects of composite taxa in supermatrices. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 27 (3): 522527.
  • Marinkovich L & Gladenkov AYu 1999. Evidence for an early opening of the Bering Strait. Nature 397: 149151.
  • Minton RL & Lydeard C 2003. Phylogeny, taxonomy, genetics and global heritage ranks of an imperiled, freshwater snail genus Lithasia (Pleuroceridae). Mol. Ecol. 12 (1): 7587.
  • Mock KE, Brim-Box JC, Miller MP, Downing ME, & Hoeh WR 2004. Genetic diversity and divergence among freshwater mussel (Anodonta) populations in the Bonneville Basin of Utah. Mol. Ecol. 13 (5): 10851098.
  • Modell H 1964. Das natürliche System der Najaden. 3. Arch. Molluskenkunde 93 (3/4): 71129.
  • Mulvey M, Lydeard C, Pyer DL, Hicks KM, Brim-Box J, Williams JD, & Butler RS 1997. Conservation genetics of North American freshwater mussels Amblema and Megalonaias. Conserv. Biol. 11: 868878.
  • Nagel K-O, Badino G, & Celebrano G 1998. Systematics of European naiades (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae and Unionidae): a review and some new aspects. Malacol. Rev. (Suppl. 7: Bivalvia I): 83104.
  • Ortmann AE 1911. A monograph of the Najades of Pennsylvania, parts I and II. Mem. Carnegie Mus. 4 (6): 279347.
  • Ortmann AE 1916. The anatomical structure of Gonidea angulata (Lea). Nautilus 30 (5): 5053.
  • Ortmann AE 1919. A monograph of the Najades of Pennsylvania, part III: systematic account of the genera and species. Mem. Carnegie Mus. 8 (1): xvi384.
  • Parmalee PW & Bogan AE 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN. 328 pp.
  • Rafinesque CS 1820. Monographie des coquilles bivalves et fluviatiles de la Rivière Ohio. Ann. Gén. Sci. Phys. (Bruxelles) 5 (13): 287322, 80–82.
  • Rawlings TA, Collins TM, & Bieler R 2003. Changing identities: tRNA duplication and remolding within animal mitochondrial genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100 (26): 1570015705.
  • Roe KJ 2000. The utility of DNA sequences to aid in the identification of rare or problematic species of freshwater mussels. In: Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. TankersleyRA, WarmoltsDI, WattersGT, ArmitageBJ, JohnsonPD, & ButlerRS, eds., pp. 197202. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH.
  • Roe KJ & Hoeh WR 2003. Systematics of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Ch. 4. In: Molecular Systematics and Phylogeography of Mollusks. LydeardC & LindbergDR, eds., pp. 91122. Smithsonian Books, Washington.
  • Roe KJ & Lydeard C 1998. Molecular systematics of the freshwater mussel genus Potamilus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacologia 39: 195205.
  • Roe KJ, Hartfield PD, & Lydeard C 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of the threatened and endangered superconglutinate-producing mussels of the genus Lampsilis (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Mol. Ecol. 10: 22252234.
  • Rosenberg G, Davis GM, Kuncio GS, & Harasewych MG 1994. Preliminary ribosomal RNA phylogeny of gastropod and unionoidean bivalve mollusks. Nautilus, Suppl. 2: 111121.
  • Serb JM & Lydeard C 2003. Complete mtDNA sequence of the North American freshwater mussel, Lampsilis ornata (Unionidae): an examination of the evolution and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial genome organization in Bivalvia (Mollusca). Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (11): 18541866.
  • Serb JM, Buhay JE, & Lydeard C 2003. Molecular systematics of the North American freshwater bivalve genus Quadrula (Unionidae: Ambleminae) based on mitochondrial ND1 sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28 (1): 111.
  • Simmons MP, Pickett KM, & Miya M 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (1): 188199.
  • Simpson CT 1891. Notes on Unionidae. Nautilus 5 (8): 8688.
  • Simpson CT 1900. Synopsis of the naiades, or pearly fresh-water mussels. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 22 (1205): 5011044.
  • Smith DG 2000a. Systematics and distribution of the recent Margaritiferidae. Ch. 3. In: Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies, Vol. 145. BauerG & Wächtler, eds., pp. 3349. Springer, Berlin.
  • Smith DG 2000b. On the taxonomic placement of Unio ochraceus Say 1817 in the genus Ligumia (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Nautilus 114 (4): 155160.
  • Smith DG & Wall WP 1984. The Margaritiferidae reinstated: a reply to Davis & Fuller (1981), “Genetic relationships among Recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America.” Occas. Pap. Mollusks Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. Univ. 4 (64): 321330.
  • Stansbery DH 1971. Rare and endangered freshwater mollusks in the eastern United States. In: Rare & Endangered Mollusks (Naiads) of the U.S. JorgensenSE & SharpRW, eds., pp. 518, 18a–f, 6 plates. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities, Minnesota.
  • Starobogatov YaI 1970. Fauna of Molluscs and Zoogeographic Division of Continental Waterbodies of the Globe. Nauka, Leningrad. 372 pp.
  • Strayer DL, Downing JA, Haag WR, King TL, Layzer JB, Newton TJ, & Nichols SJ 2004. Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America's most imperiled animals. BioScience 54 (5): 429439.
  • Swofford DL 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, & Hillis DM 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Ch. 11. In: HillisDM, MoritzC, & MableBK, eds., pp. 407514. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Turgeon DD, Quinn JF Jr., Bogan AE, Coan EV, Hochberg FG, Lyons WG, Mikkelsen PM, Neves RJ, Roper CFE, Rosenberg G, Roth B, Scheltema A, Thompson FG, Vecchione M, & Williams JD 1998. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks, 2nd ed. Special Publication 26. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Turner TF, Trexler JC, Harris JL, & Haynes JL 2000. Nested cladistic analysis indicates population fragmentation shapes genetic diversity in a freshwater mussel. Genetics 154: 777785.
  • Watters GT 2001. The evolution of the Unionacea in North America, and its implications for the worldwide fauna. In: Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies 145. BauerG & WächtlerK, eds., pp. 281307. Springer, Berlin.
  • White LR, McPheron B, & Stauffer JR 1996. Molecular genetic identification tools for the unionids of French Creek, Pennsylvania. Malacologia 38 (1–2): 181202.
  • Wiens JJ 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52 (4): 528538.
  • Williams JD & Butler RS 1994. Freshwater bivalves. In: Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, Vol. IV. DeyrupM & FranzR, eds., pp. 53128. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  • Williams ST & Knowlton N 2001. Mitochondrial pseudogenes are pervasive and often insidious in the snapping shrimp genus Alpheus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 (8): 14841493.
  • Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, & De Wachter R 1993. Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet. 9 (12): 407.
  • Zhang D-X & Hewitt GM 1996. Nuclear integrations: challenges for mitochondrial DNA markers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 (6): 247251.