SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Aguilar-Ortiz, F. 1982. Estudio ecológico de las aves del cafetal. In E.Ávila-Jiménez and A.Gomez-Pompa (Eds.). Estudios ecológicos en el agroecosistema cafetalero, pp. 103128. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Sobre Recursos Bióticos, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
  • Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: A review. Oikos 71: 355366.
  • Atauri, J. A., and J. V. de Lucio. 2001. The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. J. Landscape Ecol. 16: 147159.
  • Baillon, F., S. Benvenuti, and P. Ioale. 1992. Fidelity to non breeding site in some species of birds in Senegal. Trop. Zool. 5: 3143.
  • Bender, D. J., and L. Fahrig. 2005. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86: 10231033.
  • Bengtsson, J. P., Angelstam, and T. Elmqvis. 2003. Reserves, resilience, and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32: 38996.
  • Benton, T. G., J. A. Vickery, and J. D. Wilson. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: Is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 182188.
  • Berg, Å. 1997. Diversity and abundance of birds in relation to forest fragmentation, habitat quality and heterogeneity. Bird Study 44: 355366.
  • Bhagwat, S. A., C. G. Kushalappa, P. H. Williams, and N. D. Brown. 2005. Landscape approach to biodiversity conservation of sacred groves in the Western Ghats of India. Conserv. Biol. 19: 18531862.
  • Bhagwat, S. A., K. J. Willis, H. J. B. Birks, and R. J. Whittaker. 2008. Agroforestry: A refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 261267.
  • Bird life international. 2008. Species factsheet. Available at http://www.birdlife.org/ (accessed January 3, 2008).
  • Bonada, N., M. Rieradevall, and N. Pratonada. 2007. Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia 589: 91106.
  • Borcard, D., P. Legendre, and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 10451055.
  • Borghesio, L. 2007. Effects of human subsistence activities on forest birds in northern Kenya. Conserv. Biol. 22: 384394.
  • Calvo, L., and J. Blake. 1998. Bird diversity and abundance on two different shade coffee plantations in Guatemala. Bird Conserv. Int. 8: 297308.
  • Carlo, T. A., J. A. Collazo, and M. J. Groom. 2004. Influences of fruit diversity and abundance on bird use of two shaded coffee plantations. Biotropica 36: 602614.
  • Cohn-Haft, M., A. Whittaker, and P. C. Stouffer. 1997. A new look at the “species-poor” central Amazon: The avifauna north of Manaus, Brazil. Ornithol. Monogr. 48: 205235.
  • Connor, E. F., A. C. Courtney, and J. M. Yode. 2000. Individuals–area relationships: The relationship between animal population density and area. Ecology 81: 734748.
  • Consejo mexicano del cafe. 2001. Censo cafetalero. Consejo mexicano del cafe, Puebla, México.
  • Cruz-Angon, A., T. S. Sillett, and R. Greenberg. 2008. An experimental study of habitat selection by birds in a coffee plantation. Ecology 89: 921927.
  • Cushman, S. A., and K. McGarigal. 2002. Hierarchical, multiscale decomposition of species–environmental relationships. Landscape Ecol. 17: 637646.
  • Cushman, S. A., and K. McGarigal. 2004. Patterns in the species–environment relationship depend on both scales and choice of response variables. Oikos 105: 117124.
  • Daily, G. C., P. R. Ehrlich, and G. A. Sanchez-Azofeifa. 2001. Countryside biogeography: Use of human-dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica. Ecol. Appl. 11: 113.
  • Dietsch, T. V., I. Perfecto, and R. Greenberg. 2007. Avian foraging behaviour in two different types of coffee agroecosystem in Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 39: 232240.
  • Fahrig, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough? Biol. Conserv. 100: 6574.
  • Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487515.
  • Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York.
  • Foster, M. S. 2007. The potential of fruit trees to enhance converted habitats for migrating birds in southern Mexico. Bird Conserv. Int. 17: 4561.
  • Freemark, K. E., J. B. Dunning, S. J. Hejl, and J. R. Probst. 1995. A landscape ecology perspective for research, conservation and management. In T. E.Martin and D. M.Finch (Eds.). Population ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant birds, pp. 381427. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
  • Fuentes-Flores, R. 1979. Coffee production systems in Mexico. In F.De las Salas (Ed.). Workshop on agroforestry systems in Latin America, pp. 6072. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Costa Rica.
  • Greenberg, R., P. Bichier, and J. Sterling. 1997. Bird populations in rustic and planted shade coffee plantations of eastern Chiapas, México. Biotropica 29: 501514.
  • Greenberg, R., I. Perfecto, and S. M. Philpott. 2008. Agroforests as model systems for tropical ecology. Ecology 89: 913914.
  • Hardner, J., and R. Rice. 2002. Rethinking green consumerism. Sci. Am. 286 (5): 8995.
  • Helle, P. 1983. Bird communities in open ground–climax forest edges in northeastern Finland. Oulanka Rep. 3: 3946.
  • Henriques, L. M. P., J. M. Jr. Wunderle, and M. R. Willig. 2003. Birds of the Tapajós National Forest, Brazilian Amazon: A preliminary assessment. Ornitol. Neotrop. 14: 307338.
  • Holland, J. D., D. G. Bert, and L. Fahrig. 2004. Determining the spatial scale of species' response to habitat. BioScience 54: 227233.
  • Holland, J. D., and L. Fahrig. 2000. Effect of woody borders on insect density and diversity in crop fields: A landscape-scale analysis. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 78: 115122.
  • Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6: 6570.
  • Hughes, J. B., G. C. Daily, and P. R. Ehrlich. 2002. Conservation of tropical forest birds in countryside habitats. Ecol. Lett. 5: 121129.
  • INEGI. 2001. Land use/land cover digital map. Available at http://www.inegi.org.mx/inegi/default.aspx (accessed January 27, 2003).
  • IUCN. 2007. Species' red list status. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/info/programme (accessed January 3, 2008).
  • Jones, J., P. Ramoni-Perazzi, E. H. Carruthers, and R. J. Tobertson. 2002. Species composition of bird communities in shade coffee plantations in the Venezuelan andes. Ornithol. Neotrop. 13: 397412.
  • Kent, M., and P. Coker. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis. A practical approach. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Komar, O. 2006. Priority contribution. Ecology and conservation of birds in coffee plantations: A critical review. Bird Conserv. Int. 16: 123.
  • Laube, I., N. Breitbach, and K. Bohning-Gaese. 2008. Avian diversity in a Kenyan agroecosystem: Effects of habitat structure and proximity to forest. J. Ornithol. 149: 181191.
  • Legendre, P., R. Galzin, and M. L. Harmelin-Vivien. 1997. Relating behaviour to habitat: Solutions to the fourth-corner problem. Ecology 78: 547562.
  • Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lepš, J., and P. Šmilauer. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Leyequien, E. 2006. Birds, coffee and spatial complexity: The diversity puzzle. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • Leyequien, E. 2007. Influence of body size on coexistence of bird species. Ecol. Res. 22: 735741.
  • Leyequien, E., and V. M. Toledo. 2009. Flores y aves de cafetales: Ensambles de biodiversidad en paisajes humanos. Biodiversitas 83: 710.
  • Lima, S. L., and L. M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619640.
  • McGarigal, K., S. A. Cushman, and M. C. Neel. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
  • McGarigal, K., and W. McComb. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecol. Monogr 65: 235260.
  • Moguel, P., and V. M. Toledo. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems in Mexico. Conserv. Biol. 13: 112.
  • Mönkkönen, M., and P. Reunanen. 1999. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: A management perspective. Oikos 84: 302305.
  • Nichols, J. D., J. E. Hines, J. R. Sauer, F. W. Fallon, J. E. Fallon, and P. J. Heglund. 2000. A double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts. Auk 117: 393408.
  • Perfecto, I., and I. Armbrecht. 2003. The coffee agroecosystem in the Neotropics: Combining ecological and economic goals. In J. H.Vandermeer (Ed.). Tropical agroecosystems, pp. 159194. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
  • Perfecto, I., I. Armbrecht, S. M. Philpott, T. Dietsch, and L. Soto-Pinto. 2007. Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Latin America. In T.Tscharntke, C.Leuschner, M.Zeller, E.Guhudja, and A.Bidin (Eds.). The stability of tropical rainforest margins: Linking ecological, economic, and social constraints of land use and conservation. Environmental Science Series, pp. 227264. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Perfecto, I., R. Rice, R. Greenberg, and M. van der Voort. 1996. Shade coffee: A disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 46: 598603.
  • Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2008. Biodiversity conservation in tropical ecosystems. A new conservation paradigm. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1134: 173200.
  • Petit, L. J., D. R. Petit, D. G. Christian, and H. D. W. Powell. 1999. Bird communities of natural and modified habitats in Panama. Ecography 22: 292304.
  • Philpott, S. M., W. J. Arendt, I. Armbrecht, P. Bichier, T. V. Diestch, C. Gordon, R. Greenberg, I. Perfecto, R. Reynoso-Santos, L. Soto-Pinto, C. Tejeda-Cruz, G. Williams-Linera, J. Valenzuela, and J. M. Zolotoff. 2008. Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: Review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv. Biol. 22: 10931105.
  • Philpott, S. M., P. Bichier, R. Rice, and R. Greenberg. 2007. Field-testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs. Conserv. Biol. 21: 975985.
  • Rappole, J. H., D. I. King, and J. H. Vega-Rivera. 2003. Coffee and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 17: 334336.
  • Rickets, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158: 8799.
  • Roberts, D. L., R. J. Cooper, and L. J. Petit. 2000. Flock characteristics of ant-following birds in premontane moist forest and coffee agroecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 10: 14141425.
  • Rosenzweig, M. L. 2001. Loss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 54045410.
  • Rosenzweig, M. L. 2005. Avoiding mass extinction: Basic and applied challenges. 24th Annual Midwest Ecology and Evolution Conference, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Rotenberry, J. T. 1985. The role of habitat in avian community composition: Physiognomy or floristics? Oecologia 67: 213217.
  • Saab, V. 1999. Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: A hierarchical analysis. Ecol. Appl. 9: 135151.
  • SAGARPA. 2007. Avance de siembras y cosechas perennes 2007, riego y temporal. Available at http://w2.siap.sagarpa.gob.mx/Brio/ihtml/OpenDoc?DocInstanceID=00000110a8ac0920-0000-111f-0a0b0236&autologin=yes&cultivo=5500&DocUUID=0000010f53bb0965-0000-0bf3-0a0b0236&pass=sisprro&DocVersion=1&ciclo=3 (accessed January 3, 2008).
  • Sallabanks, R., J. R. Walters, and J. A. Collazo. 2000. Breeding bird abundance in bottomland hardwood forests: Habitat, edge, and patch size effects. Condor 102: 748758.
  • Santos, T., and J. L. Tellería. 1997. Efectos de la fragmentación sobre la saves insectívoras forestales de dos localidades europeas. Ardeola 44: 113117.
  • Schmiegelow, F. K. A., C. S. Machtans, and S. J. Hannon. 1997. Area boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. Ecology 78: 19141932.
  • Schmiegelow, F. K. A., and M. Mönkkönen. 2002. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: Avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol. Appl. 12: 375389.
  • Şekercioğlu, C. H., G. C. Daily, and P. R. Ehrlich. 2004. Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 1804218047.
  • Shankar-Raman, T. R. 2006. Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shaded plantations in the Western Ghats, India. Biodivers. Conserv. 15: 15771607.
  • Tejeda-Cruz, C., and W. Sutherland. 2004. Bird responses to shade coffee production. Anim. Conserv. 7: 169179.
  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation–environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Plant Ecol. 69: 6977.
  • Ter Braak, C. J. F., and T. Šmilauer. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to CANOCO for windows: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.
  • Terborgh, J., S. K. Robinson, T. A. Parker III, C. A. Munn, and N. Pierpont. 1990. Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 213238.
  • Thiollay, J. M. 1995. The role of traditional agroforests in the conservation of rain forest bird diversity in Sumatra. Conserv. Biol. 9: 335353.
  • Toledo, V. M. 2005. Repensar la conservación ¿Áreas naturales protegidas o estrategia bioregional? Gaceta Ecol. 77: 6782.
  • Toledo, V. M., B. Ortiz-Espejel, L. Cortés, P. Moguel, and X. Ordoñez. 2003. The multiple use of tropical forests by indigenous peoples in Mexico: Case of adaptive management. Conserv. Ecol. 7: 9. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art9 (accessed October 12, 2005).
  • Tscharntke, T., M. Klein, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dwenter, and C. Thies. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8: 857874.
  • Tscharntke, T., C. H. Şekercioğlu, T. V. Dietsch, N. S. Sodhi, P. Hoehn, and M. Tylianakis. 2008. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89: 944951.
  • Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern and process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 17197.
  • Turner, M. G., and R. H. Gardner. 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.
  • Vandermeer, J., and R. Carvajal. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Am. Na. 158: 211220.
  • Villard, M. A., M. K. Trzcinski, and G. Merriam. 1999. Fragmentation effects on forest birds: Relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv. Biol. 13: 774783.
  • Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385397.
  • Wunderle, J. M. Jr., and S. C. Latta. 1998. Avian resource use in Dominican shade coffee plantations. Wilson Bull. 110: 271281.
  • Wunderle, J. M. Jr., and S. C. Latta. 1996. Avian abundance in sun and shade coffee plantations and remnant pine forest in the Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic. Ornitol. Neotrop. 7: 1934.