SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355366.
  • Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., E. Pineda, F. Escobar, and J. Benítez-Malvido. 2009. Value of small patches in the conservation of plant-species diversity in highly fragmented rainforest. Conserv. Biol. 23: 729739.
  • Baatz, M., and A. Schäpe. 2000. Multiresolution segmentation – an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In J. Strobl, T. Blaschke, and G. Griesebner (Eds.). Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII, pp. 1223. Wichmann Verlag, Salzburg.
  • Benz, U., P. Hofmann, G. Willhauck, I. Lingenfelder, and M. Heynen. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 58: 239258.
  • Borcard, D., P. Legendre, and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 10451055.
  • ter Braak, C. J. F., and P. Smilauer. 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5) Microcomputer Power. New York.
  • Bruun, H. H. 2000. Patterns of species richness in dry grassland patches in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 23: 641650.
  • Burel, F. 1992. Effect of landscape structure and dynamics on species diversity in hedgerow networks. Landsc. Ecol. 6: 161174.
  • Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd Edition). Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Buytaert, W., R. Célleri, B. De Bièvre, F. Cisneros, G. Wyseure, J. Deckers, and R. Hofstede. 2006. Human impact on the hydrology of the Andean páramos. Earth Sci. Rev. 79: 5372.
  • Collins, C. D., R. D. Holt, and B. L. Foster. 2009. Patch size effects on plant species decline in an experimentally fragmented landscape. Ecology 90: 25772588.
  • Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 37: 3546.
  • Cooper, H. D., E. C. Wolf, C. Colson, W. Vering, A. Granda, and M. Meyer. 2010. Alpine peatlands of the Andes, Cajamarca, Peru. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 42: 1933.
  • Definiens, A. G. 2007. Definiens Developer, München, Germany: Definiens A.G. Available at: http://www.definiens.com (accessed 4 December 2008).
  • Dingle Robertson, L., and D. King. 2011. Comparison of pixel- and object-based classification in land cover change mapping. Int. J. Remote Sens. 32: 15051529.
  • Dirnböck, T., S. Dullinger, and G. Grabherr. 2003. A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J. Biogeogr. 30: 401417.
  • Eriksson, A., O. Eriksson, and H. Berglund. 1995. Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish semi-natural pastures. Ecography 18: 310317.
  • Ewers, R. M., and R. K. Didham. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81: 117142.
  • Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487515.
  • Guirado, M., J. Pino, and F. Roda. 2007. Comparing the role of site disturbance and landscape properties on understory species richness in fragmented periurban Mediterranean forests. Landsc. Ecol. 22: 117129.
  • Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143156.
  • Gustafson, E. J., and G. R. Parker. 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landsc. Ecol. 7: 101110.
  • van der Hammen, T. 1979. Historia y tolerancia de ecosistemas parameros. In M. L. Salgado-Labouriau (Ed.). El Medio Ambiente Páramo, pp. 5566. Ediciones Centro de Estudios Avanzados, Mérida, Colombia.
  • Helm, A., I. Hanski, and M. Partel. 2006. Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol. Lett. 9: 7277.
  • Hess, C. 1990. “Moving up-Moving down”: agro-Pastoral land-use patterns in the Ecuadorian Paramos. Mt. Res. Dev. 10: 333342.
  • Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 19651978.
  • Hodgson, J., A. Moilanen, and C. D. Thomas. 2009. Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics. Ecology 90: 16081619.
  • Hooghiemstra, H., and T. van der Hammen. 2004. Quaternary Ice-Age dynamics in the Colombian Andes: developing an understanding of our legacy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 359: 173181.
  • Janzen, D. H. 1973. Rate of regeneration after a tropical high elevation fire. Biotropica 5: 117122.
  • Jules, E. S., and P. Shahani. 2003. A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important than we thought. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 459464.
  • Laurance, W. F., L. V. Ferreira, J. M. Rankin-de Merona, and S. G. Laurance. 1998. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79: 20322040.
  • Laurance, W. F., D. Pérez-Salicrup, P. Delamonica, P. Fearnside, S. D'Angelo, A. Jerozolinski, L. Pohl, and T. E. Lovejoy. 2001. Rain forest fragmentation and the structure of Amazonian liana communities. Ecology 82: 105116.
  • Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology (2nd Edition). Elservier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • López Sandoval, M. F. 2004. Agricultural and Settlement frontiers in the tropical andes: the paramo belt of northern Ecuador, 1960–1990. Institut für Geographie and der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Luteyn, J. L. 1992. Paramos: why study them? In H. Balslev, and J. L. Luteyn (Eds.). Paramo: an andean ecosystem under human influence, pp. 114. Academic Press Limited, U.K.
  • Luteyn, J. L. 1999. Paramos: a checklist of plant diversity, geographical distribution, and botanical literature. New York Botanical Garden Press, The Bronx.
  • Martinuzzi, S., W. A. Gould, and O. M. Ramos González. 2007. Creating cloud-free Landsat ETM+ Data sets in tropical landscapes: cloud and cloud-shadow removal. United States Department of Agriculture, Portland, Oregon.
  • McGarigal, K., and S. A. Cushman. 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol. Appl. 12: 335345.
  • McGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon.
  • McGarigal, K., and W. C. McComb. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 235260.
  • Melcher, I., F. Bouman, and A. Cleef. 2000. Seed dispersal in páramo plants: epizoochorous and hydrochorous taxa. Plant Biol. 2: 4052.
  • Peterson, D. L., E. G. Schreiner, and N. M. Buckingham. 1997. Gradients, vegetation and climate: spatial and temporal dynamics in the Olympic Mountains, U.S.A. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 6: 717.
  • Prugh, L., K. Hodges, A. Sinclair, and J. Brashares. 2008. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. PNAS 105: 2077020775.
  • R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed 15 September 2010).
  • Ramsay, P. M., and E. R. B. Oxley. 2001. An assessment of aboveground net primary productivity in Andean grasslands of central Ecuador. Mt. Res. Dev. 21: 161167.
  • Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158: 8799.
  • Sanchez, P. E. 2003. Perú. In R. Hofstede, P. Segarra, and P. Mena (Eds.). Los páramos del mundo. Proyecto Atlas Mundial de los Páramos, pp. 159204. Global Peatlands Initiative/NC-IUCN/EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador.
  • Sánchez-Vega, I., M. Cabanillas, A. Miranda, W. Poma, J. Díaz, F. Terrones, and H. Bazán. 2005. La Jalca, el ecosistema frío del noroeste peruano – Fundamentos biológicos y Ecológicos (1st Edition). Yanacocha – Geográfica EIRL, Lima, Perú.
  • Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27: 379423.
  • Tilman, D., R. M. May, C. Lehmann, and M. A. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 6566.
  • Turner, M. G. 2005. Landscape Ecology: what is the state of the Science? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 319344.
  • Venables, W. N. 1998. Exegeses on Linear Models. Paper presented at S-PLUS User's Conference, pp. 126, Washington, DC.
  • Vuille, M., R. Bradley, M. Werner, and F. M. Keimig. 2003. 20th century climate change in the Tropical Andes: observations and model results. Clim. Change 59: 7599.
  • Walter, V. 2004. Object-based classification for remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 58: 225238.
  • Weberbauer, A. 1945. El mundo vegetal de los Andes peruanos. UNALM, Ministerio de Agricultura, Lima, Peru.
  • Weigend, M. 2002. Observations on the biogeography of the Amotape-Huancabamba zone in northern Peru. Bot. Rev. 68: 3854.
  • Whittingham, M. J., P. A. Stephens, R. B. Bradbury, and R. P. Freckleton. 2006. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 11821189.
  • Whittingham, M. J., R. D. Swetnam, J. D. Wilson, D. E. Chamberlain, and R. P. Freckleton. 2005. Habitat selection by yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella on lowland farmland at two spatial scales: implications for conservation management. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 270280.
  • Williams, N., J. Morgan, M. McCarhy, and M. McDonnell. 2006. Local extinction of grassland plants: the landscape matrix is more important than patch attributes. Ecology 87: 30003006.
  • Young, K. R. 2009. Andean land use and biodiversity: humanized landscapes in a time of change. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 492507.