Charles S. Buer
Flavonoids are ubiquitous in the plant kingdom and have many diverse functions including defense, UV protection, auxin transport inhibition, allelopathy, and flower coloring. Interestingly, these compounds also have considerable biological activity in plant, animal and bacterial systems – such broad activity is accomplished by few compounds. Yet, for all the research over the last three decades, many of the cellular targets of these secondary metabolites are unknown. The many mutants available in model plant species such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago truncatula are enabling the intricacies of the physiology of these compounds to be deduced. In the present review, we cover recent advances in flavonoid research, discuss deficiencies in our understanding of the physiological processes, and suggest approaches to identify the cellular targets of flavonoids.
Charles S. Buer
Flavonoids are low molecular weight secondary metabolites (Figure 1) that, unlike primary metabolites, are not essential for plant survival. Nevertheless, they are bioactive across kingdoms with over 9 000 structural variants known (Williams and Grayer 2004). The chemical diversity, size, three-dimensional shape, and physical and biochemical properties of flavonoids allow them to interact with targets in different subcellular locations to influence biological activity in plants, animals, and microbes (Taylor and Grotewold 2005; Peer and Murphy 2007).
Flavonoids have roles in many facets of plant physiology. One of their most important roles is to influence the transport of the plant hormone, auxin (Peer and Murphy 2007). Other roles include defense (Treutter 2005), allelopathy (Bais et al. 2006), and modulating the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Taylor and Grotewold 2005; Bais et al. 2006). Flavonoids also provide flower coloring to attract pollinators (Mol et al. 1998), and in many species are required for pollen viability (Coe et al. 1981; Mo et al. 1992; Taylor and Jorgensen 1992). Unlike other plant species, the pollen of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants lacking flavonoids are not sterile (Burbulis et al. 1996), and this role is probably compensated for by other molecules. As flavonoids absorb UV light, flavonoid-deficient mutants are susceptible to UV irradiation, but some can compensate by the over-production of sinapate esters (Li et al. 1993; Sheahan 1996).
Recent evidence has shown that flavonoids have evolved particular roles in legumes. They are not only required to signal symbiotic bacteria in the legume-bacterium symbiosis (Redmond et al. 1986; Djordjevic et al. 1987; Wasson et al. 2006) but also play important direct roles in root nodule organogenesis (Wasson et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2009). Flavonoids also accumulate in the progenitor cells for different legume organs (Mathesius et al. 1998a; Morris and Djordjevic 2006) and influence the development of in vitro root formation (Imin et al. 2007).
Apart from being important dietary components, many therapeutic benefits of flavonoids are known in animal systems. Flavonoids have anti-oxidant, anti-proliferative, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, and pro-apoptotic activities, and some molecular targets have been identified (Williams et al. 2004; Taylor and Grotewold 2005; Garcia-Mediavilla et al. 2007; Pandey et al. 2007; Sung et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2008; Singh et al. 2008). The health-promoting effects of flavonoids may relate to interactions with key enzymes, signaling cascades involving cytokines and transcription factors, or antioxidant systems (Polya 2003).
The present review will focus on advances in our knowledge pertaining to flavonoid biosynthesis, differential in situ accumulation of flavonoids in various flavonoid pathway mutants as well as flavonoid uptake and movement within the plant. We will then discuss the roles played by flavonoids in plant physiology and development, including efforts to define the molecular targets for flavonoids. Readers are directed to recent reviews that cover auxin modulation and other developmental processes (Taylor and Grotewold 2005; Boudet 2007; Peer and Murphy 2007).
What is New in Flavonoid Biosynthesis?
Flavonoids are synthesized in plants via the flavonoid branch of the phenylpropanoid and acetate-malonate metabolic pathway (Figure 1). Unlike legumes, Arabidopsis lacks chalcone reductase and isoflavone synthase enzymes, and subsequently it cannot produce isoflavonoids (Aoki et al. 2000) (Figure 1, box). The flavonoid pathway is well-described in Arabidopsis, and mutants are available with defects in genes encoding for each enzymatic step (Table 1) and within regulatory genes encoding transcription factors that affect the pathway. These mutants were selected based on the seed testa color. A wide range of color, from tan to yellow, result due to different levels of proanthocyanidins in the flavonoid pathway mutants (Debeaujon et al. 2000) (Figure 2). In Arabidopsis, most flavonoid pathway genes occur in single copies, which greatly simplifies experimentation (Winkel-Shirley 2001); whereas in legumes, for example, most genes occur in multigene families (Arioli et al. 1994; Lawson et al. 1994; McKhann and Hirsch 1994; Mathesius et al. 2001). Interestingly, an Arabidopsis flavonol synthase (FLS) locus with putative redundancy also proved to be a single functioning gene, as the other FLS genes were found to be non-functional (Owens et al. 2008a).
|tt1||WIP zinc finger protein||At1G34790||X-rays||(Sagasser et al. 2002)|
|tt2||MYB domain protein 123||At5G35550||X-rays||(Nesi et al. 2001)|
|tt3||Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase||At5G42800||X-rays||(Shirley et al. 1995)|
|tt4||Chalcone synthase||At5G13930||EMS||(Koornneef 1990)|
|tt5||Chalcone isomerase||At3G55120||Fast neutrons||(Shirley et al. 1995)|
|tt6||Flavonone 3-hydroxylase||At3G51240||EMS||(Pelletier and Shirley 1996)|
|fls1||Flavonol synthase||At5G51240||T-DNA||(Owens et al. 2008a)|
|tt7||Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase||At5G07990||EMS||(Schoenbohm et al. 2000)|
|tt8||bHLH domain protein||At4G09820||Unknown||(Nesi et al. 2000)|
|tt10||Polyphenol oxidase (laccase-like protein)||At5G48100||EMS||(Pourcel et al. 2005)|
|ttg1||WD40 repeat protein||At5G24520||EMS||(Walker et al. 1999)|
|ttg2||WRKY TF||At2G37260||Unknown||(Ishida et al. 2007)|
Recent studies have characterized the TT6 locus, which encodes flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H) (Owens et al. 2008b). This enzyme is a member of the 2-oxoglutarate dependent (2-OG) dioxygenase super family of enzymes. The tt6 mutation was presumed to be leaky, as the seed testa gradually darkens, but subsequent research showed that the enzyme encoded by this mutation is catalytically inactive (Owens et al. 2008b). It is thought that other 2-OG dioxygenases (FLS or anthocyanidin synthase (ANS)) can partially complement for F3H activity.
The tt6 mutant has a previously unrecognized long hypocotyl phenotype (Figure 3) (Buer and Djordjevic 2009), which can also be clearly seen from examining the images in other publications (Owens et al. 2008b). This phenotype is similar to the Arabidopsis hy5 mutation which has flavonoid-deficient roots and elevated auxin transport (Sibout et al. 2006). Attempting to complement the tt6 phenotype by adding dihydrokaempferol (DHK) unexpectedly caused the hypocotyls to further elongate rather than restoring normal hypocotyl growth (Buer and Djordjevic 2009). This mutant clearly requires further investigation.
Differential in situ Accumulation of Flavonoids in transparent testa Mutants
A useful property of flavonoids is that they can be visualized locally, in planta, due to their fluorescence properties. This is best imaged after the addition of exogenous diphenylboric acid 2-amino ethyl ester (DPBA), which complexes with flavonoids and greatly enhances their fluorescence properties (Buer et al. 2007) (Figure 4). Excitation at 488 nm produces an easily observable fluorescence (Figure 4C). UV excitation also works, but autofluorescence from callose interferes with flavonoid fluorescence (light blue color in Figure 4B,D) and the overall fluorescence is subsequently weaker. The DPBA enhancement of fluorescence depends on the structure of the flavonoid. Quercetin (Q)-DPBA (gold) and kaempferol (K)-DPBA (green) complexes fluoresce strongly. Q-DPBA fluoresces 400 times more strongly than DPBA complexes with dihydroquercetin (DHQ), dihydrokaempferol (DHK) or naringenin (N), (Buer et al. 2007). Specific flavonoid-DPBA complexes also occur in legumes (Djordjevic et al. 1997; Mathesius et al. 1998a, 2000).
Arabidopsis flavonoid mutants have differential DPBA-flavonoid fluorescence determined by which compound accumulates due to the specific mutation (Figure 5). In some mutants, Q accumulates strongly in the distal elongation zone where gravitropic bending, auxin accumulation, and auxin synthesis occur (Blancaflor and Masson 2003). Given the role that certain flavonoids, including Q, have in affecting auxin transport (Jacobs and Rubery 1988), the effects of Q accumulation in this region requires careful examination.
Although the in situ concentrations of flavonoid compounds in root tips remain unknown, experimentation provides some clues. The application of a range of naringenin concentrations to the root tips of the flavonoid-less tt4 mutant showed that, after 1 h, a weak fluorescent signal could be detected in the presence of 1 nM naringenin (Figure 6). This offers a remarkable sensitivity for detecting flavonoids in situ in individual plants. By comparison, the detection level of flavonoids using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is around 1 μM (Table 2), and requires extraction from over 1 000 roots (approximately 300 mg fresh weight).
|Flavonoid compound||Minimum detection level|
Flavonoid Uptake and Movement
Using Arabidopsis flavonoid-pathway mutants, two new features for flavonoids were recently demonstrated. Selective uptake systems exist for flavonoids, and flavonoids are capable of long-distance movement (Buer et al. 2007, 2008). This was best demonstrated using the tt4 mutant, which is defective in flavonoid biosynthesis, due to a lesion in chalcone synthase (CHS) but retains the downstream enzymatic machinery in the pathway. Adding the downstream aglycones (N, DHK, DHQ, K, or Q) to the tt4 mutant allowed uptake to be assessed, in real time, within different tissues through the analysis of flavonoid fluorescence. The uptake systems in Arabidopsis were highly selective preferring the non-planar flavonoids (N, DHQ, and DHK), which are unsaturated at the 2,3 position, but not the planar Q or K (Figure 1).
Different plant tissues were capable of flavonoid uptake. Once taken up, the flavonoids were converted to downstream products and transported long distances in the plant. This was confirmed using grafting (Buer et al. 2008), where flavonoid competent roots could “complement” flavonoid production in a tt4 shoot scion and vice versa (Figure 7). Movement in the root-to-shoot direction appears to be symplastic, and shoot-to-root movement appears to be limited to the vascular tissue (Figure 8) – but the precise conducting tissue was not defined. The physiological relevance of selective flavonoid uptake and movement requires further investigation. Flavonoid uptake could have implications for allelopathic interactions between root systems of different plants. As the roots of Arabidopsis seedlings grown in the dark do not produce flavonoids, a possible role for shoot-to-root flavonoid movement could be to provide flavonoids to the roots of seedlings to control root growth and gravitropic responses.
Deciphering the players involved in flavonoid movement is required to understand the mechanism. Unlike auxin, aglycones are uncharged molecules and therefore lipophilic, and likely to associate with plant membranes. Therefore, directional movement from one membrane system to the next would require a transport mechanism. The multi-drug and toxin efflux (MATE) superfamily has been identified recently as a membrane protein family (Brown et al. 1999) with 9 to 14 membrane-spanning domains (Schwacke et al. 2003). These proteins are possible candidates for mediating the short and long distance movement of compounds within plants as well as for intracellular metabolite trafficking. There are 56 genes belonging to the MATE family in Arabidopsis, and only a few of these proteins have been studied to date. Biochemical data on transport properties and functional aspects of family members are scarce, as is the identification of functional conserved signatures or domains. The MATE transporters encoded by these genes may cover a diverse range of functions in plant growth and development, in particular in the transport of important compounds. Their characterization, however, is consistent with them also transporting small, organic compounds. For example, the TRANSPARENT TESTA12 (TT12) protein is thought to localize to the vacuolar membrane in developing seeds, where it controls the sequestration of flavonoids (Debeaujon et al. 2001). ABERRANT LATERAL ROOT FORMATION5 (ALF5), which is expressed strongly in the root epidermis, is required for resistance to a number of compounds (Diener et al. 2001). ENHANCED DISEASE SUSEPTIBILITY5 (EDS5) might transport salicylic acid or a precursor required for its synthesis (Nawrath et al. 2002). A. thaliana DETOXIFICATION1 (AtDTX1) is capable of effluxing plant-derived alkaloids such as berberine and palmatine (Li et al. 2002), and FERRIC REDUCTASE DEFECTIVE3 (FRD3) acts as a proton-coupled citrate exporter on the plasma membrane, extruding citrate into the xylem or the rhizosphere (Durrett et al. 2007).
We used the gene expression profiling tool Genevestigator (Grennan 2006) to demonstrate the expression of the MATE gene family (Figure 9A) and it is clear from this analysis that the expression of these genes is quite diverse. While several family members show wide expression in many tissue types (such as At3G21690; At4G25640, At1G64820, At1G66780, At2G34360, At5G10420, At2G38330, At1G47530, At4G21900, and At4G21900), many others showed specific expression in a particular tissue (At4G00350, At4G29140, At5G19700, At1G71870, At5G17700, At3G26590, FRD3, ALF5, TT12, At4G22790, At1G11670, At3G23550, At1G61890, and At1G58340). For instance, transcripts At3G26590, FRD3, At4G22790, At5G52450, At1G47530, At2G38330, At2G34360, At3G21690, At4G38380, and At4G23030 express in the xylem. These expression analyses were confirmed by the “electronic fluorescent pictograph” browser available at http://bbc.botany.utoronto.ca/efp/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi (Winter et al. 2007). To examine the expression of MATE genes in roots, we extracted the transcriptome data for MATE genes from the root expression map database (http://www.arexdb.org) (Birnbaum et al. 2003; Brady et al. 2007). The expression patterns of some of the MATE genes (including FRD3 and ALF5) are presented in Figure 9B. Many of the transcripts (EDS5, FRD3, At1G47530, and At3G21690) showed very tissue-specific expression patterns while others showed more general expression (ALF5, At1G11670, At1G61890, and At3G23550). In summary, the analysis of expression patterns of the members of the MATE family exhibit distinct, yet overlapping, expression patterns, which may support their potential involvement in the transport of a broad range of compounds including flavonoids in a variety of plant cells and tissues. A further functional characterization of MATE genes may shed light on their involvement in flavonoid transport.
A method to determine the genes responsible for transport could be to re-mutagenize tt4 mutant seeds using ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS) and screen for subsequent mutants that cannot fluoresce after supplying N to the roots. Alternatively, identified transport mutants could be genetically crossed with tt4 to screen for the lack of flavonoid uptake. There is precedence for considering these proteins as candidates, as flavonoid interactions have been shown with the MATE-type ABCB proteins (Lewis et al. 2007) and glutathione S-transferase (Smith et al. 2003). Also, glybenclamide, which inhibits ABCC transporters, inhibited flavonoid movement in Arabidopsis (Buer et al. 2007). Active movement is also supported by the tissue-specific localization of flavonoids, their cell-to-cell movement, and their unidirectional movement when applied mid-root. If the movement was diffusion mediated, the flavonoid distribution should be less localized and movement bidirectional. Interestingly, ABC transporters are also involved in auxin transport (Geisler et al. 2005; Terasaka et al. 2005; Lewis et al. 2009), and p-glycoproteins are inhibited by some flavonoids (Zhang and Morris 2003).
Flavonoids Have Important Roles in Plant Physiology and Development
A long-held belief was that flavonoids influence plant architecture (Taylor and Grotewold 2005; Buer and Djordjevic 2009), particularly through their effects upon auxin transport. However, some of the best supporting evidence for flavonoid roles in shoot branching (Brown et al. 2001) was refuted recently when this phenotype in the tt4 mutant was found to be due to a background max mutation (Bennett et al. 2006), which affects the branching hormone, strigolactone (Gomez-Roldan et al. 2008). Nevertheless, recent studies have reaffirmed the link between flavonoids and plant architecture by showing that flavonoid-defective mutants display a wide range of alterations to root and shoot development (Buer and Djordjevic 2009). Here, flavonoid mutants compromised at different steps in the flavonoid pathway were affected, to varying degrees, in a myriad of developmental processes. Traits affected included alterations to root growth, lateral root density, root hair development and length, shoot/flower organ number, overall architecture and stature, and seed organ density. The roots of tt4 have a delayed gravitropic response, a conditional increased in lateral root density, a root looping phenotype when grown on hard slanted agar (Figure 10A), and produce unusual root organs more rapidly than wild-type plants when grown in agar (Buer and Djordjevic 2009). Importantly, normal root architecture is restored in some mutants by direct flavonoid supplementation. For example, adding naringenin to the media restores the looping tt4 root phenotype to that of the wild type (Figure 10B) and is titratable (Figure 10C).
Further investigation is required for several interesting tt mutants. The branching phenotype discovered in tt8, tt10, and ttg1 (Buer and Djordjevic 2009) that leads to multiple influorescences may be important for increasing seed yield in agricultural plants, as increased numbers of inflorescences should produce plants with more seeds. Are these transcription factors (tt8 and ttg1) or enzymes (tt10) mediating these branching effects by regulating auxin transport directly or indirectly, or do they have other roles in regulating branching? Are there strigolactone-independent branching pathways? TT10 is interesting in this regard as it may have roles in multiple biochemical pathways: it functions as an enzyme for biflavonol production and has a role in oxidizing procyanidins to the brown proanthocyanidins (Figure 1).
The flavonoid-mediated architectural changes discovered in plants are likely to have broad implications. For example, some mutants possessed changes that could be important for yield (e.g. increased flower number and increased seed organ production), or provide more resilient responses to environmental stress (increased lateral root and root hair density). However, this requires further exploration as the mechanisms through which the perturbations in flavonoid levels mediate these changes are not well understood. Three likely mechanistic possibilities are: direct effects of flavonoids on unidentified molecular targets, indirect effects mediated by the ability of flavonoids to modulate the levels of auxin, or through ROS regulation.
Flavonoids play distinct roles in root nodule formation
Indeterminate nitrogen-fixing nodules form on the roots of the model legume, Medicago truncatula due to the symbiosis established with the bacterium, Sinorhizobium meliloti. Flavonoids play several roles in establishing this symbiosis through a precise molecular dialogue. First, Nod factors (chito-lipooligosaccharides) are produced by S. meliloti in response to specific flavonoids released by the plant roots into the rhizosphere. This is thought to be due to a precise recognition of particular flavonoids by the bacterial nodD protein (Redmond et al. 1986; Djordjevic et al. 1987; McIver et al. 1989) but more than 20 years on from this discovery, this has not been formally demonstrated (Cooper 2007). The Nod factors produced are required to trigger the nodule organogenesis program in the plant (Denarie et al. 1996).
Recent studies showed that different flavonoid classes also play distinct roles in the plant in establishing root nodules (Wasson et al. 2006; Subramanian et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2009). These compounds, however, are not required for the formation of other root organs, such as lateral roots or galls formed by root knot nematodes (Wasson et al. 2009) even though flavonoids accumulate during the formation of these organs. Hairy root transformation was used to silence different genes in the Medicago flavonoid pathway and to alter flavonoid accumulation patterns (Wasson et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2009). These plants were then used in conjunction with direct flavonoid complementation and specific S. meliloti constructs to dissect the distinct roles of flavonoids in root nodule formation. These elegant in vivo studies first confirmed that specific flavones, such as 7,4′-dihydroxyflavone, were required to stimulate the production of Nod factor synthesis in Sinorhizobia in the rhizosphere and in planta. Second, these findings suggested that certain flavonols such as kaempferol play direct roles in orchestrating plant organogenesis. This most likely occurs via the ability for kaempferol to induce localized inhibition of auxin transport, thus establishing more favorable hormonal gradients to enable root nodule formation from differentiated root cells. A third finding was that isoflavones appear to act as anti-inducers in planta to presumably modulate flavone-dependent Nod factor synthesis (Zhang et al. 2009).
These in planta studies confirm and support conclusions made using in vitro studies conducted over many years (Redmond et al. 1986; Djordjevic et al. 1987, 1997; Mathesius et al. 1998a, 1998b). During the formation of determinate root nodules, in plants such as soybean, flavonoid-regulated auxin transport inhibition was not a requirement for nodule organogenesis, but flavonoids were still required to orchestrate the symbiotic interaction between the plant and the microbial symbiont both in the rhizosphere and in planta (Subramanian et al. 2007). Collectively, these studies have provided direct evidence for the essential roles that flavonoids play in root nodule formation. It remains to be determined if the induction of flavonoid synthesis in the direct vicinity of root nodule initiation, and the accumulation of specific flavone classes in the cells and nuclei of nodule cells induced early in the ontogeny process play specific roles in nodule ontogeny.
Gravity responses and the auxin connection
Flavonoids also negatively regulate polar auxin transport in plants (Mathesius et al. 1998b; Brown et al. 2001; Buer and Muday 2004). Jacobs and Rubery (1988) showed that flavonoids compete, in vitro, for auxin transporters with the auxin efflux inhibitor, 1-napthyphthalmic acid (NPA). These experiments suggest that flavonoids bind to NPA-interacting proteins: either a plasma membrane aminopeptidase or the multi-drug resistant ABCD type transporters, but this remains to be proven. Consistent with flavonoids modulating auxin transport in plants, mutants of Arabidopsis devoid of flavonoids (CHS defective tt4) show elevated levels of auxin transport and gravitropic and architectural abnormalities (Brown et al. 2001; Buer and Muday 2004; Lewis et al. 2007; Buer and Djordjevic 2009). Some of these abnormalities can be complemented by the external application of naringenin, which is taken up by the tt4 mutant, converted to downstream flavonoid compounds, and distributed throughout the plant (Buer et al. 2007). These tt4 mutants have a delayed gravity response, but although devoid of flavonoids, they can still respond to gravity stimulation. Thus, flavonoids are not absolutely required for gravitropic responses in Arabidopsis.
One way to further examine the role of flavonoids in the gravity response is to test those transparent testa mutants that accumulate more quercetin in the distal elongation zone compared with the wild-type plants (Figure 3). As quercetin is a potent inhibitor of auxin transport (Jacobs and Rubery 1988), these mutants would be expected to have different gravity responses and possibly greater inhibition of auxin transport. The influence of other flavonoid intermediates (N, DHK, DHQ, and K) on auxin transport has not been assessed. The availability of mutants that accumulate these intermediates could be used to assess the individual contributions of particular flavonoids to auxin transport levels. Therefore, although N can complement several defects in flavonoid-less plants, the specific flavonoid product(s) and target(s) responsible for restoration of gravitropic and architectural defects remain to be defined.
Recent advances have shed some light on how flavonoids may operate in plants. Flavonoids appear to modulate MDR4, a P-glycoprotein (Lewis et al. 2007), now called ABCB (Verrier et al. 2008), and either interact with PIN2 (Santelia et al. 2008) or affect the distribution of PIN proteins (Peer et al. 2004). Recently, flavonoids were shown to bind to mammalian actin and affect its rate of polymerization (Böhl et al. 2007). Other experiments showed that auxin and actin interact, and this interaction had a subsequent effect on gravitropism in rice (Nick et al. 2009). If flavonoids negatively affect actin function in plants, it is possible that this could explain the mis-localization of PIN proteins mediating auxin transport, and the diverse effects of flavonoids on auxin transport given the role of actin in vesicular trafficking and recycling. The activity of plant peroxidases that destroy auxin is also affected by flavonoids– at least using in vitro studies (Mathesius 2001). However, translating in vitro observations to in vivo function remains enigmatic. Chemical biology approaches, such as photoaffinty tagging and chemical genetics, are needed to identify specific flavonoid interacting partners.
Defining the Molecular Targets for Flavonoids
Flavonoids have diverse bioactivities in plants and animals. Surprisingly, a better understanding of the interacting partners for flavonoids exists in animals. Flavonoids interact with plasma membrane and cytosolic targets, and some similarities exist between plant and mammalian molecular targets. For example, a potential pharmacological outcome for flavonoids is their ability to inhibit the P-glycoprotein MDR1 (Conseil et al. 1998), an integral membrane protein in mammals with similarity to the plant auxin efflux protein, PIN. MDR proteins render tumors resistant to anti-tumor drugs. Other membrane targets for flavonoids include cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2), nitric oxide synthase (NOS) (Garcia-Mediavilla et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2008) and the membrane receptor, GLUT4, that mediates insulin-dependent glucose uptake (Strobel et al. 2005).
Flavonoids have broad biological activity, but the molecular mechanisms by which flavonoids interfere with the relevant signal chains and their molecular targets remain elusive. Pollen fertility is flavonoid-dependent in a wide range of species (angiosperms, gymnosperms, and mono- and dicotyledonous plants) (Coe et al. 1981; Mo et al. 1992; Taylor and Grotewold 2005). Flavonoid-less pollen fails to produce a functional pollen tube, and this defect can be complemented rapidly by the external addition of specific flavonols, which restores pollen tube growth (Mo et al. 1992). It is not known if this flavonoid-dependent fertility is mediated through auxin changes in the pollen, or if other novel targets exist for flavonoids, and thus this presents a good experimental system to investigate flavonoid interacting proteins.
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The diversity, ubiquity, and bioactivity of flavonoids make these compounds of interest to a wide variety of research. It is still unknown exactly how these compounds exert their influence on growth, auxin transport, and other biologically relevant interactions in the plant kingdom. It is obvious that considerably more research is required to dissect out the complexities involved with flavonoid functions in the plant and animal kingdoms. Research on mechanisms of bioactivity in animals, and the use of modern molecular tools in model plant systems should enable mechanisms and interacting molecules to be determined in the near future.
(Co-Editor: William J. Lucas)
The Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrated Legume Research is thanked for support (CEO348212). The colleagues of the Genomic Interactions Group are thanked for their valuable input, especially Jeremy Weinman for editing advice.