Get access

Limits to Climate Change Adaptation: Case Study of the Australian Alps

Authors

  • CLARE MORRISON,

    Corresponding author
    1. International Centre for Ecotourism Research, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, QLD 4222, Australia.
      Email: c.morrison@griffith.edu.au
    Search for more papers by this author
  • CATHERINE PICKERING

    1. School of Environment, Griffith University, 226 Grey Street, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia.
    Search for more papers by this author

Errata

This article is corrected by:

  1. Errata: Corrigendum Volume 51, Issue 2, 224, Article first published online: May 2013

Email: c.morrison@griffith.edu.au

Abstract

Climate change is occurring and not being mitigated, motivating adaptation but adaptation strategies can have biophysical, economic, technological, and social limits. We review publicly available documents to assess how successful current and proposed adaptation strategies may be for the Australian Alps, including likely limits and potential collaborations and conflicts among stakeholders. Conservation managers, the tourism industry, and local communities have implemented or are proposing a range of adaptation strategies in the region. Some stakeholder strategies complement each other (e.g. invasive species control, fire management), while others are potential sources of conflict (water and electricity for snowmaking, year-round tourism). Economic costs and biophysical constraints are the most important limits to these adaptation strategies. These types of limits and conflicts between different stakeholders on adaptation strategies are likely to occur in other regions and demonstrate that adaptation may only provide partial and short term solutions to the challenges of climate change.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary