SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abreu, L.D.V. 2005. A transient three-dimensional numerical model to simulate vapor intrusion into buildings. UMI 3166060. Ph.D. diss., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe.
  • Abreu, L.D.V., and P.C. Johnson. 2006. Simulating the effect of aerobic biodegradation on soil vapor intrusion into buildings: Influence of degradation rate, source concentration, and depth. Environmental Science and Technology 40, no. 7: 23042315.
  • Abreu, L.D.V., and P.C. Johnson. 2005. Effect of vapor source–building separation and building construction on soil vapor intrusion as studied with a three-dimensional numerical model. Environmental Science and Technology 39 no. 12: 45504561.
  • [API] American Petroleum Institute. 2009. Simulating the effect of aerobic biodegradation on soil vapor intrusion into buildings: Evaluation of low strength sources associated with dissolved gasoline plumes. In press.
  • Bordon, R.C., and P.B. Bedient. 1986. Transport of dissolved hydrocarbons influenced by oxygen-limited biodegradation. 1. Theoretical development. Water Resource Research 22 no. 13: 19731982.
  • Connor J.A., F. Ahmad, and T.E. McHugh. 2006. Evaluation of vapor intrusion from subsurface diesel plume using multiple lines of evidence. In Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Assessment, and Remediation Conference, 90–104. November 6–7, Houston, Texas. Westerville, Ohio: National Ground Water Association.
  • DeVaull, G.E. 2007. Indoor vapor intrusion with oxygen-limited biodegradation for a subsurface gasoline source. Environmental Science and Technology 41 no. 9: 32413248.
  • Ettinger, R.A., and T. McAlary. 2005. Site-specific vapor intrusion evaluation including biodegradation. Presented at Battelle In-Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, June 6–9, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Hers, I., J. Atwater, L. Li, and R. Zapf-Gilje. 2000. Evaluation of vadose zone biodegradation of BTX vapours. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 46, no. 3–4: 233264.
  • [ITRC] Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. 2007. Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guide. VI-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Vapor Intrusion Team. www.itrcweb.org (accessed February 12, 2009).
  • Johnson, P.C., M.W. Kemblowski, and R.L. Johnson. 1999. Assessing the significance of subsurface contaminant vapor migration to enclosed spaces: Site-specific alternatives to generic estimates. Journal of Soil Contamination 8, no. 3: 389421.
  • Lundegard, P.D., P.C. Johnson, and P. Dahlen. 2008. Oxygen transport from the atmosphere to soil gas beneath a slab-on-grade foundation overlying petroleum-impacted soil. Environmental Science and Technology 40, no. 15: 55345540.
  • McAlary, T., P. Nicholson, D. Bertrand, L. Abreu, and R. Ettinger. 2007. A case study on the influence of aerobic biodegradation on vapor intrusion at a former refinery property. Platform presentation at the Air and Waste Management Association’s Specialty Conference on Vapor Intrusion, September 27, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • [NJDEP] New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2005. Vapor intrusion guidance. Trenton, New Jersey: NJDEP.
  • Pasteris, G., D. Werner, K. Kaufmann, and P. Hohener. 2002. Vapor phase transport and biodegradation of volatile fuel compounds in the unsaturated zone: A large scale lysimeter experiment. Environmental Science and Technology 36, no. 1: 3039.
  • Roggemans, S., C.L. Bruce, and P.C. Johnson. 2001. Vadose zone natural attenuation of hydrocarbon vapors: An empirical assessment of soil gas vertical profile data. API Technical Bulletin No. 15. Washington, D.C.: American Petroleum Institute.
  • USEPA. 2002. OSWER draft guidance for evaluating the vapor intrusion to indoor air pathway from groundwater and soils (subsurface vapor intrusion guidance). Washington, D.C.: USEPA.