SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Human Reprod Update 2001; 7: 5964.
  • 2
    Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tusboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. Int J Urol 2005; 12: 8928.
  • 3
    Pasqualotto FF, Sobreiro BP, Hallak J, Pasqualotto EB, Lucon AM. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after varicocelectomy repair: an update. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 6359.
  • 4
    Enciso M, Muriel L, Fernandez J, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Marcos M, et al. Infertile men with varicocele show a high relative proportion of sperm cells with intense nuclear damage level, evidenced by the sperm chromatin dispersion test. J Androl 2006; 27: 10611.
  • 5
    Daitch J, Bedaiwy M, Pasqualatto E, Hendin B, Hallak J, Falcone T, et al. Varicocelectomy improves intrauterine insemination success rates in men with varicocele. J Urol 2001; 165: 15103.
  • 6
    Lee JS, Park HJ, Seo JT. What is the indication of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azospermia? Urology 2007; 69: 3525.
  • 7
    Zucchi A, Mearini L, Mearini E, Fioretti F, Bini V, Poreno M. Varicocele and fertility: relationship between testicular volume and seminal parameters before and after treatment. J Androl 2006; 27: 54851.
  • 8
    Gat Y, Zukerman Z, Chakraborty J, Gornish M. Varicocele, hypoxia and male infertility. Fluid mechanics analysis of the impaired testicular venous drainage system. Human Reprod 2005; 20: 26149.
  • 9
    Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology 2007; 69: 41720.
  • 10
    Nguyen MM, Das S. The evolution or robotic urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 6538.
  • 11
    Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, et al. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1179.