Is there a Problem about Propositional Unity?
Article first published online: 19 AUG 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01274.x
© 2011 The Author. dialectica© 2011 Editorial Board of dialectica
Additional Information
How to Cite
PEACOCK, H. (2011), Is there a Problem about Propositional Unity?. Dialectica, 65: 393–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01274.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 AUG 2011
- Article first published online: 19 AUG 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
The problem of the ‘Unity of the Proposition’ is the problem of explaining the difference between a content-expressing declarative sentence and a ‘mere list’ of referents. The prevailing view is that such a problem is to be solved metaphysically, either by reducing our ontology to exclude propositions or universals, or by explaining how it is possible for a certain kind of complex entity – the ‘proposition’– to ‘unify’ its constituents. I argue that these metaphysical approaches cannot succeed; instead the only viable approach is linguistic, identifying features of the (type–) sentence itself that enable it to express a content. Thus the problem of the ‘Unity of the Proposition’ (distinguishing sentences from lists) is distinct from the problem of ‘propositional unity’ (explaining how the constituents of propositions form a unified content). I suggest that, while the latter problem is not pressing, the former does not permit of an answer which applies in generality in all languages; we can only fully explain the Unity of the Proposition for single languages or groups of similar languages.

1746-8361/asset/dltc_centre.gif?v=1&s=8b04071e456f4b7caa8ce5367bf8b8f3d01f1ae0)
