Research Article: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Modeling Studies of N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides as Non-nucleoside HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Authors


Corresponding author: Yan Hong, hongyan@bjut.edu.cn

Abstract

A series of N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives (24) designed as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was synthesized and evaluated for their inhibitory activity against HIV-1 (IIIB) replication in MT-4 cell cultures. The compounds 24 were performed by the reaction of thiols and 2-chloro-N-substituted-acetamides and active in the lower micromolar concentration (1.25–20.83 μm). The studies of structure–activity relationship suggested that 1H-benzo[d]imidazole ring at arylthio moiety strongly improved the anti-HIV activity and consistent with the experimental data. The results of molecular modeling and docking within the RT non-nucleoside binding site using AutoDock confirmed that the 3 series, similar to other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors such as N-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N’-[2-(4-ethoxy-3-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)ethyl]-thiourea (PETT), was assumed in a butterfly-like conformation and helped to rationalize some SARs and the biological activity data.

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) is an essential enzyme converting the single-stranded viral RNA genome into linear double-stranded DNA prior to its integration into the host genomic DNA (1). Because of its important role in the HIV-1 life cycle, RT is one of the most attractive targets for the development of new antiretroviral agents (2–4). Two functionally distinct classes of HIV-1 RT inhibitors have been discovered and used in clinically or clinical trials (5,6): nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) that interact competitively with the catalytic site of the RT, and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) that inhibit the enzyme by an allosteric interaction with a site adjacent to the NRTI binding site (the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding site, namely NNBS). Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors have gained an increasingly important role in the therapy of HIV infection in multidrug regimens and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), such as nevirapine, delavirdine, efavirenz (7–9), 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5,1-jk][1,4]benzodiazepin- 2(1H)-one and -thione (TIBO) derivatives (10), thiocarboxanilides (11) and pyridinones (12). However, the emergence of drug-resistant viral strains (13–15) has limited the therapeutic efficiency of these inhibitors. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel classes of NNRTIs with activity against the drug-resistant mutants.

Recently, a novel class of HIV-1 NNRTIs, N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides, e.g.: sulfanyltriazoles A (16), sulfanyltetrazoles B (17), sulfanylthiadiazoles C (18) and VRX-480773 (19), has been identified by the submicromolar activity and significant in vitro activity, especially the VRX-480773 inhibited viruses from efavirenz-resistant molecular clones (Figure 1). Studies of crystal structures of the RT complex with inhibitors suggested that NNRTIs share a common mode of action and interact with a hydrophobic pocket. Upon binding, N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides assumed a typical butterfly-like conformation, the arylthio moiety and the phenyl ring mimicking the butterfly wings. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies showed that the arylthio moiety strongly influenced the antiviral activity, leading to different results depending on steric/electronic properties of atoms/groups. Furthermore, introduction of a set of electron-withdrawing groups at N-aryl moiety was highly positive for anti-HIV-1 activity. On the basis of these mode, the lead compounds (Figure 1) had been mainly based on independent variations of the portions and established the potent derivatives 24 (Figure 2) featured by the following patterns: (i) the substitution of pyridine, 1H-benzo[d]imidazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole rings at arylthio moiety, (ii) the substitution of the phenyl ring or replacement of the phenyl ring with a pyrimidyl ring at N-aryl moiety.

Figure 1.

 Lead N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide inhibitors of HIV-1 RT.

Figure 2.

 Novel synthesized N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives.

In this study, we described a facile synthesis of N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives 24 and an evaluation for their inhibitory activity against HIV-1 (IIIB). With the aim to rationalize the biological results and to predict the activity of novel NNRTIs of 24, we focused on the SAR and the correlation between the inhibitory activities and the binding free energies, obtained by structural and molecular modeling studies on the HIV-1 RT NNBS using AutoDock 4.0 (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Methods and Materials

Melting points were determined on a XT-4A melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. Infrared (IR) spectra (KBr) were recorded on a Bruker vertex 70 spectrophotometer. 1H NMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker ARX-400 MHz spectrophotometer, and chemical shift values are expressed in δ values (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. Coupling constants are given in Hz, and signals are quoted as follows: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), m (multiplet) and br s (broad singlet). All NH and OH protons were exchangeable with D2O. Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were measured on a ZAB-HS & ESQUIRE6000 mass spectrometer. All compounds were routinely checked by TLC and 1H NMR. TLC was performed by using aluminum-baked silica gel plates (60 HF-254, Combinol Reagent Corp., Yantai, China). The developed chromatograms were visualized under ultraviolet light at 254 nm or by iodine vapor. All solvents were reagent grade and, when necessary, were purified and dried by standard methods.

General procedures for the preparation of 2-chloro-N-substituted-acetamides (1)

Chloroacetyl chloride (33.0 mmol) was added dropwise to a mixture of the appropriate amine (28.0 mmol) and acetic acid (25 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for an additional four hours. Then, it was slowly poured into 100 mL of ice water. The aqueous solution was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 100 mL), the organic phase was washed and dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent was evaporated to furnish a solid residue which was purified by crystallization from a mixture of ethyl acetate/petroleum ether.

2-Chloro-N-phenylacetamide (1a)

Yield 91.3%; m.p. 129.7–130.9 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.17 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.20 (m, 1H, PhCH-p, = 7.2 Hz), 7.39 (m, 2H, PhCH-m, = 7.8, 1.9 Hz), 7.54 (m, 2H, PhCH-o, = 7.5, 1.2 Hz), 8.30 (br s, 1H, NH ).

2-Chloro-N-(2,5-di-fluoro-phenyl)acetamide (1b)

Yield 87.0%; m.p. 116.5–117.6 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.19 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.80 (m, 1H, PhCH-p, = 5.6 Hz), 7.20 (m, 1H, PhCH-m, = 6.2 Hz), 7.54 (m, 1H, PhCH-o, = 2.1 Hz), 9.35 (br s, 1H, NH ).

2-Chloro-N-(3,5-di-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)acetamide (1c)

Yield 94.8%; m.p. 85.4–86.5 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.14 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.68 (s, 1H, PhCH-p), 8.22 (s, 2H, PhCH-o), 9.48 (br s, 1H, NH ).

2-Chloro-N-(4,6-dimethoxy-pyrimidin-2-yl)acetamide (1d)

Yield 74.9%; m.p. 158.3–159.8 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.91 (s, 6H, 2 × OCH3), 4.26 (s, 2H, CH2), 5.76 (s, 1H, Pyrimidine-H5), 9.62 (br s, 1H, NH ).

General procedures for the preparation of N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives (2–4)

The corresponding thiol (11.7 mmol) was added to a solution of NaOH (0.56 g, 14.1 mmol) in water (5 mL) while stirring at room temperature. A solution of respective 2-chloro-N-substituted-acetamide 1ad (9.8 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) and KI (0.5 g, 3.0 mmol) was added dropwise. Stirring was continued for 1 h, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was treated with water (50 mL) and CH2Cl2 (30 mL). The phases were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic phases were dried and concentrated to give a solid, then recrystallized from a mixture of CH2Cl2/petroleum ether.

N-phenyl-2-(pyridin-2-ylthio)acetamide (2a)

Yield 87.5%; m.p. 61.3–62.9 °C; IR(KBr, cm−1): 3436 (NH), 1684 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.90 (s, 2H, -CH2), 7.05–7.09 (t, 1H, PhCH-p, = 7.4 Hz), 7.14–7.17 (q, 1H, Pyridine-H5, = 5.2 Hz), 7.27–7.33 (m, 3H, PhCH-m, Pyridine-H3), 7.49–7.50 (d, 2H, PhCH-o, = 8.0 Hz), 7.58–7.62 (m, 1H, Pyridine-H4, = 7.6 Hz), 8.55–8.56 (t, 1H, Pyridine-H6, = 4.0 Hz), 10.13 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 266.9 [M+Na]+.

N-(2,5-di-fluoro-phenyl)-2-(pyridin-2-ylthio)acetamide (2b)

Yield 50.6%; m.p. 112.5–113.8 °C; IR(KBr, cm−1): 3435 (NH), 1694 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.90(s, 2H, -CH2), 6.65–6.69 (m, 1H, Ph-H4), 6.93–6.99 (m, 1H, Ph-H3), 7.13–7.16 (m, 1H, Ph-H6), 7.29–7.32 (d, 1H, Pyridine-H5, = 8.4 Hz), 7.57–7.61 (m, 1H, Pyridine-H3), 8.21–8.26 (m, 1H, Pyridine-H4), 8.54–8.55 (t, 1H, Pyridine-H6, = 2.4 Hz), 10.85 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 302.9 [M+Na]+.

N-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-2-(pyridin-2-ylthio)acetamide (2c)

Yield 57.4%; m.p. 110.6–111.7 °C; IR(KBr, cm−1): 3431 (NH), 1669 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.88 (s, 2H, -CH2), 7.21–7.26 (q, 1H, Pyridine-H5, = 5.2Hz), 7.35–7.37 (d, 1H, Pyridine-H3, = 8.0 Hz), 7.55(s, 1H, Ph-H4), 7.62–7.66 (m, 1H, Pyridine-H4), 7.98 (s, 2H, Ph-H2,6), 8.56–8.57 (d, 1H, Pyridine-H6, = 5.2 Hz), 10.94(s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 381.0 [M+H]+, 403.0 [M+Na]+.

N-(4,6-di-methoxy-pyrimidin-2-yl)-2-(pyridin-2-ylthio)acetamide (2d)

Yield 87.4%; m.p. 117.6–118.5 °C; IR(KBr, cm−1): 3433 (NH), 1678 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.92 (s, 6H, 2 × OCH3), 4.16 (s, 2H, -CH2), 5.75 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.08–7.11 (q, 1H, Pyridine-H5, = 5.2 Hz), 7.30–7.32 (d, 1H, Pyridine-H3, = 8.0 Hz), 7.55–7.59 (m, 1H, Pyridine-H4), 8.50–8.51(d, 1H, Pyridine-H6, = 3.6 Hz), 10.34 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 307.0 [M+H]+, 329.0 [M+Na]+, 345.0 [M+K]+.

2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-ylthio)-N-phenylacetamide (3a)

Yield 86.2%; m.p. 199.1–200.5 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3436 (NH), 1677 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.28 (s, 2H, -CH2), 7.04–7.08 (t, 1H, PhCH-p, = 7.6Hz), 7.11–7.15 (m, 2H, PhCH-m), 7.29–7.33 (t, 2H, PhCH-o, = 8.0 Hz), 7.41–7.51 (d, 2H, 2-Ph-H4,5, = 5.6 Hz), 7.57–7.60 (d, 2H, 2-Ph-H3,6, = 8.0 Hz), 10.51 (s, 1H, Imidazole-H), 12.66 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 281.9 [M–H].

2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-ylthio)-N-(2,5-di-fluoro-phenyl)acetamide (3b)

Yield 86.8%; m.p. 193.0–194.8 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3432 (NH), 1679 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.13 (s, 2H, -CH2), 6.79–6.85 (m, 1H, Ph-H4), 7.17–7.25 (m, 3H, 2-Ph-H4,5, Ph-H3), 7.56 (d, 2H, 2-Ph-H3,6, = 4.7 Hz), 8.23–8.28 (m, 1H, Ph-H6), 11.60 (s, 1H, Imidazole-H), 11.84 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 317.9 [M–H].

2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-ylthio)-N-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)acetamide (3c)

Yield 89.2%; m.p. 202.4–203.8 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3432 (NH), 1680 (C = O); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.34 (s, 2H, -CH2), 7.11–7.15 (m, 2H, 2-Ph-H4,5), 7.42–7.47 (t, 2H, 2-Ph-H3,6, = 18.2, 1.4Hz), 7.79 (s, 1H, Ph-H4), 8.25 (s, 2H, Ph-H2,6), 11.14 (s, 1H, Imidazole-H), 12.69 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 418.0 [M–H].

2-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)-N-pheny-lacetamide (4a)

Yield 76.2%; m.p. 174.4–175.6 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3300 (NH), 1665 (C = O), 1629 (C = N); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.99 (s, 2H, -CH2), 7.05–7.09 (t, 1H, PhCH-p, = 7.4Hz), 7.30–7.34 (m, 4H, Ph-H), 7.56–7.58 (d, 2H, -NH2, = 7.6 Hz), 10.25 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%):288.9 [M+Na]+, 304.9 [M+K]+.

2-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)-N-(2,5-di-fluorophenyl)acetamide (4b)

Yield 81.1%; m.p. 179.3–180.2 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3306 (NH), 1672 (C = O), 1629 (C = N); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.11 (s, 2H, -CH2), 6.69 (s, 2H, -NH2), 6.85–6.91 (m, 1H, Ph-H4), 7.19–7.26 (m, 1H, Ph-H3), 8.13–8.18 (m, 1H, Ph-H6), 9.81 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 301.0 [M+H]+, 324.9 [M+Na]+, 340.9 [M+K]+.

2-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)-N-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)acetamide (4c)

Yield 82.2%; m.p. 184.2–185.9 °C; IR(KBr, cm−1): 3489 (NH), 1698 (C = O), 1615 (C = N); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 4.10 (s, 2H, -CH2), 6.72 (s, 2H, -NH2), 7.73 (s, 1H, Ph-H4), 8.29 (s, 2H, Ph-H2,6), 10.26 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 424.9 [M+Na]+, 440.9 [M+K]+.

2-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylthio)-N-(4,6-di-methoxy-pyrimidin-2-yl)acetamide (4d)

Yield 89.3%; m.p. 187.1–188.5 °C; IR (KBr, cm−1): 3462 (N-H), 1667 (C = O), 1630 (C = N); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 3.88 (s, 6H, 2 × OCH3), 4.38 (s, 2H, -CH2), 5.93 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.29 (s, 2H, NH2), 10.69 (s, 1H, NH); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 329.0 [M+H]+, 350.9 [M+Na]+, 366.9 [M+K]+.

In vitro assays of anti-HIV activity

The inhibitory activity of the test compounds on HIV-1 IIIB replication in MT-4 was based on the quantitative detection of HIV-1 p24 core antigen in the culture supernatant, which was determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) by Vironostika HIV-1 Antigen MicroeLisa Assay (Organon Teknika, Dublin, Ireland), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 1 × 104 MT-4 cells in 96-well plates were infected with HIV-1 IIIB (100 TCID50) in the presence or absence of a test compound at graded concentrations, followed by incubation at 37 °C overnight. Then, the culture supernatants were removed, and fresh media containing no test compounds were added. After 2 days of cultivation, the medium was removed and the cells were fixed with 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde for 5 min at room temperature. The cells were then washed three times with PBS and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 100 μL of an indicator HRP. The reaction was terminated by addition of 1N H2SO4. Absorbance at 450 nm was recorded in an ELISA reader. Recombinant protein p24 was included for establishing standard dose–response curves. Each sample was tested in triplicate.

Molecular modeling study

The automated docking studies were performed with AutoDock 4.0 (20). This automated ligand-docking program uses the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) to explore the full range of ligand conformational flexibility with partial flexibility of the receptor. Lamarckian genetic algorithm is a hybrid of a genetic algorithm and a local search algorithm. This algorithm first builds a population of individuals (genes), each gene being a different random conformation of the docked compound. The local search algorithm then performs energy minimizations on a user-specified proportion of the population of individuals. If the energy of the new individual is lower than that of the old, the new one is automatically accepted as the next step in docking.

Preparation of the receptor and ligands molecules

The three-dimensional structures of ligands were constructed using standard bond lengths and bond angles of the GaussView 3.09 software (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA). Geometry optimizations were carried out with the semi-empirical AM1 method, and then output files were minimized by using density functional (DFT) method by applying the B3LYP (Becke, Lee, Yang and Parr) correlation functional in the second optimization. Gasteiger partial charges were assigned using the AutoDock Tools. The crystal structure of HIV-1 RT receptor in complex with PETT (N-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N’-[2-(4-ethoxy-3-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)ethyl]-thiourea) was retrieved from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (PDB entry code 1dtt). After the removal of the inhibitor from the complex, polar hydrogen atoms and the Kollman-united charges were added to the macromolecule.

Molecular modeling and analysis of the docked results

For the docking, a grid spacing of 0.375 Å and 61 × 61 × 61 number of points were used. Given the known location of the NNRTI-binding site, the cubic grid box was centered in the catalytic active region and encompassed the binding site, and the grid center was designated at dimensions (x, y and z): −1.121, −34.649 and 23.964. Docked conformations were generated using the LGA with an initial population size of 150 structures. Further parameters were set to their default values. For docking assessment, the same docking protocol was used on the reference drug PETT. AutoDock successfully reproduced the bound conformation with a RMSD value of only 1.31 Å. The first-ranked docked conformation (Best Docked conformation) and the lowest-energy conformation of the most populated cluster (Best Cluster conformation) were selected as the binding conformation. Model analyses were performed using the Accelrys DS Visualizer 2.0 software (Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results and Discussion

Chemistry

The N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives were synthesized using the conventional strategy as depicted in Scheme 1. The starting compound, 2-chloro-N-substituted-acetamides (1), was readily synthesized by the reaction of chloroacetyl chloride and anilines or pyrimidinylamines in acetic acid at ambient temperature in 75–95% yields (21). By alkylation of the corresponding sodium thiolate with 1, we prepared N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives 24. At the alkylation reactions, the literature procedure (22) was carried out for several hours in ethanol. Our more versatile procedure used KI as the catalyst, which afforded the N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides in good yields and with short reaction times. The 24 were isolated in 51–89% yields (Table 1) as colorless powders, which were generally purified by recrystallization with CH2Cl2 and petroleum ether. The structures of 24 were determined by the IR, NMR and mass spectra. The 1ad were confirmed in particular by the presence of a proton of NH as a singlet signal at 8.30–9.62 ppm in 1H NMR spectra. The IR spectrum of the N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives (24) contained a characteristic absorption band of the CONH group at 1665–1700 and 3300–3460/cm. The 1H NMR spectra of 24, containing the thiomethylene group, revealed the SCH2 protons at 3.88–4.38 ppm. In addition, the ESI–MS spectra of 24 exhibited the anticipated molecular ion peaks, and the fragmentation ions were consistent with their structures.

Figure Scheme 1:.

 General preparation of N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides (24). Reagents and conditions: (i) chloroacetyl chloride, AcOH, 0 °C→rt, 4 h; (ii) thiol, NaOH, EtOH, KI, rt, 1 h.

Table 1.   Preparation of 2ad, 3ac and 4ad and anti-HIV-1 activity valuesaThumbnail image of

Biological activity

The inhibitory activity of N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamide derivatives 24 was evaluated against HIV-1 (IIIB) replication in MT-4 cell culture using ELISA (23,24). The compound Zidovudine (azidothymidine, AZT) was used as a reference drug. The results, expressed as IC50 values, are summarized in Table 1. Although the tested compounds exhibited less anti-HIV-1 activities than that of AZT (IC50 = 0.016 μm) as the control, the majority of them were active in the lower micromolar concentration (1.25–20.83 μm), appreciably revealing their promising potential inhibitory activities.

It has been observed that the electronic properties of the arylthio substituents significantly affected the activity compared to the N-aryl substituents. Among them, analogs of 3 series showed IC50 values <5.07 μm. Compound 3b was the most active one with the highest potency (IC50 = 1.25 μm) lower than the reference drug of AZT, which indicates that the 1H-benzo[d]imidazole is an acceptable isosteric replacement for the triazole in the lead compound A. Interestingly, the activities of 1H-benzo[d]imidazoles 3ac were turned out to be the most potent N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides compared to the corresponding pyridines 2ad and 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazoles 4ad (3a versus 2a and 4a; 3b versus 2b and 4b; 3c versus 2c and 4c).

The electronic proprieties of groups on the N-aryl affected the antiviral potency of 24. The introduction of fluorine atoms or tr–uoromethyl groups on the N-phenyl ring improved antiviral potency, whereas their unsubstituted N-phenyl series led to less potent derivatives in both 1H-benzo[d]imidazole and 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole series (compare 3b,c with 3a, and 4b,c with 4a). It is appeared to confirm our assumption that the analogs bearing an electron-withdrawing group might be more potent than the congeners with an electron-donating group. Interestingly, the 2,5-difluoro derivative 3b was two times more potent than 3,5-ditrifluoromethyl compound 3c, and the same replacement of 4b was led to a decrease in potency with respect to the 3,5-ditrifluoromethyl compound 4c. The activity trend suggested that the steric/electronic properties of the N-phenyl substituents influenced the antiretroviral activity more than how their positions do.

Successively, the type of rings on the N-aryl also affected the antiviral potency of 24. 4d with heteroaryl ring was indicated the highest anti-HIV activity in the 4 series, probably because the 4,6-dimethoxy-pyrimidyl ring might be more favorable to improve a putative π-stacking interaction between the electron-deficient aryl ring of the ligand and the electron-rich benzene ring of RT (25).

Molecular docking studies

In attempt to further elucidate the high HIV-1 inhibitory potencies of the 24 at a molecular level, the computer-simulated automated docking studies were performed using the widely distributed molecular docking software, AutoDock, which has been successfully used to predict protein recognition and binding (26–28). The HIV-1 RT/NNRTI complexes of X-ray crystallography had identified that the NNRTIs show a common configuration resembling a butterfly-like shape where the wings generally contain aromatic rings that have π–π interactions with aromatic amino acid residues (29–33). All test compounds 24 were docked into the NNBS using the recently published HIV-1 RT protein crystal structure of PETT (PDB entry code 1dtt) as template (29). Prior to automate docking of the reported inhibitors, PETT itself was docked into the HIV-1 RT crystal structure as a means of testing program performance. A superposition of the most highly scored conformation of the ligand onto its crystallographic geometry yielded a RMSD (root mean square deviation) of 1.31 Å, which was the best docked conformation by <2 Å (34), thus revealing that AutoDock was successful in reproducing the binding mode of PETT into the active site of HIV-1 RT.

Two different interactional modes of 3b and 4d with the RT receptor were generated from docking. In the most frequently occurring and most favorable result, 3b was found to bind the NNBS in an orientation very similar to that of the co-crystallized inhibitor PETT, and compound 4d displayed a different binding mode. Figure 3 shows the predicted binding mode of 3b and 4d to the active site of HIV-1 RT. A schematic depiction of the interaction between both inhibitors and the RT NNBS residues is illustrated in Figure 4. It can be observed from Figure 3A that the NH function of the 1H-benzo[d]-imidazole of 3b makes a hydrogen bond with the main chain carbonyl oxygen of Glu138 (NH···O = C, = 2.08 Å), whereas compound 4d is involved in two hydrogen bonds with the enzyme backbone: one involves the amino group of thiadiazole and the carbonyl oxygen of Glu138 (NH···O = C, = 2.20 Å) and the other occurs between the nitrogen of thiadiazole and the main chain NH group of Lys101 (N···HN, = 1.82 Å).

Figure 3.

 Stereographic views of the binding mode of compounds (A) 3b and (B) 4d in the HIV-1 RT NNBS. The ligands are represented as bold sticks, while the amino acid residues lining the RT NNBS are shown as thin sticks. For clarity, only interacting polar hydrogen atoms are displayed. Hydrogen bonds are depicted as dashed lines.

Figure 4.

 Schematic diagrams showing the intermolecular interactions between the inhibitors (A) 3b, (B) 4d, and the surrounding residues of HIV-1 RT NNBS. NNBS, non-nucleoside binding site.

In comparing the docking simulations of 2ad with that of 3b and 4d in the NNBS, we did not observe any H-bonding interaction between the nitrogen of pyridine and the enzyme. The lack of this hydrogen bond prevents the ligand from assuming a bioactive U-shaped conformation within the NNBS, and this is consistent with the biological data, which shows that 3b and 4d are more potent than 2.

As shown in Figure 4A, the thiomethyl linker of the RT/3b complex is embedded within a hydrophobic pocket made up by the side chains of Val106 and Val179, while the 1H-benzo[d]-imidazole moiety fills the hydrophobic bottom of the NNBS made up by the aromatic rings of Tyr181, Tyr188 and Trp229 as well as by Glu138. In particular, it is involved in π–π interactions with Tyr181, Tyr188 and interacts with a tilted T contact with the aromatic indole nucleus of Trp229. Furthermore, the favorable steric interactions of the N-phenyl ring with a hydrophobic pocket are defined by the side chains of the Leu100, Lys103, His235 and Tyr318. The fluorine atom establishes van der Waals contacts with the Pro236 main chain atoms, and the imidic oxygen is involved in a network of polar interactions with the Leu100 main chains, thus providing further stabilization to the complex.

Interestingly, the conformation of compound 4d in Figure 4B lies along the RT NNBS in opposite direction to that of 3b. The pyrimidine ring establishes the π–π interactions with the Tyr181 and Tyr188 side chain, whereas the thiadiazole group is involved in van der Waals interactions with Val179, Lys101 and Gly190. Notably, the model shows the formation of two potential intermolecular hydrogen bonds, which is one more than that of 3b.

This additional hydrogen bond might explain not only the same level of antiviral activity of 3b through a stable interaction with RT but also its reverse binding mode to the NNBS. In fact, if their binding modes were similar, the thiadiazole group should be located at the bottom of the RT pocket, as above said for the 1H-benzo[d]-imidazole ring of 3b. As a consequence, this moiety would not be suitably situated to form the hydrogen bond with Lys101. The reverse binding mode of 4d cannot approximate the butterfly-like structure commonly observed with other NNRTIs (29), but it is compensated by the number of hydrophobic contacts and more hydrogen bonds in which 4d is engaged.

Inspection of the RT/3b complex revealed that the N-phenyl ring is hosted in a subpocket, made up by the side chains of Leu100, Lys103, His235 and Tyr318. Notably, these residues are involved through prominent van der Waals and π–π stacking interactions, with the π-electron systems located in the butterfly wings of RT NNBS conformation (30,32). We hypothesized that an efficient occupancy of this region by strategically designed aromatic substituents should yield more potent anti-HIV-1 agents with higher affinity for the RT binding pocket. Actually, the analog 3b and 3c were fourfold and twofold more active than 3a, respectively, suggesting that there is a wide sterically allowed usable space in the regions hosting the N-phenyl and the (hetero)aryl moieties. These observations could provide the basis for further structural modifications of them.

Binding affinities

The binding affinity was evaluated by the binding free energies (ΔGb), inhibition constants (Ki) and hydrogen bonding values. The compounds 24 which revealed the highest binding affinities, that is, the lowest binding free energies, within HIV-1 RT NNBS and the hydrogen bond interactions into the target macromolecule, are represented in Table 2. The 3 series exhibited the lowest free energy between −7.00 and −6.55 kcal/mol and 3b with the least binding free energy (−7.00 kcal/mol) by fitting well into the groove of the binding site. The overall correlation between the inhibitory activities (IC50, μM) of the N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamids 24 and the binding affinities (lower binding free energy) predicted by AutoDock was fairly good for some compounds. Especially, the correlation between the binding free energy (ΔGb) and IC50 (μm) values for compounds 3ac and 4ad revealed a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.720 as shown in Figure 5.

Table 2.   The best docking results based on the binding free energies (ΔGb) and inhibition constants (Ki) of 24
CompoundΔGba (kcal/mol)KibHydrogen bonds between atoms of compounds and amino acidsRMSDc (Å)
Atom of compoundAmino acidDistance (Å)Angle (°)
  1. aBinding free energy.

  2. bInhibition constant.

  3. cRoot mean square deviation.

  4. dThe native co-crystallized bound ligand (PETT) of HIV-1 RT (PDB code: 1dtt).

2a−4.763.26E–47.32
2b−5.736.26E–54.63
2c−5.578.22E–58.49
2d−5.271.37E–45.69
3a−6.551.59E–5N1–HCO of Glu 1382.03162.17.85
3b−7.007.35E–6N1–HCO of Glu 1382.08154.58.76
3c−6.681.27E–5N1–HCO of Lys 1011.77169.78.75
4a−6.232.69E–57.09
4b−5.815.50E–55.67
4c−6.013.96E–5C5–NHCO of Gly 992.15142.46.51
C5–NHCO of Glu 1382.20159.4
N1HN of Lys 1011.78145.3
4d−6.507.83E–5C5–NHCO of Glu 1382.20135.33.80
N1HN of Lys 1011.82160.5
PETTd−6.073.57E–5N8–HCO of Lys 1012.16124.61.31
Figure 5.

 Correlation between the ΔGb and IC50 of 3ac and 4ad.

Conclusions

N-aryl-2-arylthioacetamides 24 were designed and synthesized as a new class of NNRTIs, taking into account the ‘butterfly-like’ conformation as a determinant requisite for antiretroviral activity. These compounds showed significant anti-HIV-1 activity in the micromolar concentration range (1.25–20.83 μm). Compounds 3ac turned out to be the most potent derivatives compared to 2ad and 4ad, by the replacement of the pyridine or thiadiazole ring of the arylthio moiety with 1H-benzo[d]imidazole. In particular, introduction of fluorine atoms or trifluoromethyl groups on the N-phenyl ring of 3 series was endowed with high activity and selectivity. The most potent 3b displayed an IC50 value of 1.25 μm lower than that of the lead compound A.

Molecular modeling and docking studies were employed to understand the interactions between these inhibitors and the reverse transcriptase. The highest potency of 3b would be ascribable to the stabilization by the hydrogen bond between the NH of the 1H-benzo[d]-imidazole and the Glu138 main chain carbonyl and van der Waals contacts between the N-phenyl ring and the Leu100, Lys103, His235 and Tyr318 side chains, which bind to reverse transcriptase assuming a ‘butterfly-like’ orientation. Finally, considering the binding affinities and conformations of 3 series, further SAR studies, keeping constant the N-phenyl and the (hetero)aryl substitution patterns emerged as the best in the present work, will be the object of the following paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan Period (No. 2008ZX10001-015) and Funding Project for Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality. We thank Department of Viro-Pharmacology, Beijing University of Technology, for their assistances in the experiments.

Ancillary