SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agreement on the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994) (TRIPS)
  • Bodenhausen, G. H. C. (1968, reprinted in 1991) Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. WIPO Publication 611, Geneva.
  • Bouchoux, D. (2009) Intellectual Property: The Law of Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents and Trade Secrets, 3rd edition. Delmar Cengage Learning, New York.
  • Canada—Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products WT/DS114/R (17 March 2000).
  • Concise Oxford English Dictionary (2009) 11th edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Cornel & Company Limited v Mitsui and Company Limited and others [2000] 1 Sri LR 57.
  • Correa, C. M. (2007) Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • de Carvalho, N. P. (2006) The TRIPS Regime of Trademarks and Designs. Kluwer Law International, the Netherland.
  • Drahos, P. (1995) ‘Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT’, Prometheus, 13(1), 619.
  • European Communities—Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R (29 September 2006).
  • European Communities—Protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs WT/DS174/R (15 March 2005).
  • European Union Trademark Directive 1988 formally known as the First Council Directive of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (89/104/EEC) [European Union].
  • Griffiths, A. (2007) ‘The Trade Mark Monopoly: An Analysis of the Core Zone of Absolute Protection under Art. 5(1)(a)’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 3, 312349.
  • Gutowski, R. J. (1999) ‘The Marriage of Intellectual Property and International Trade in the TRIPS Agreement: Strange Bedfellows or a Match Made in Heaven?’, Buffalo Law Review, 47, 71361.
  • Honey, R. and Sinden, P. (2000) ‘The Interface between Trademark, Designs and Passing Off under Australian Law: The Philips Case’, Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 7(4), [online]. Available at http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v7n4/sinden74.html [Accessed in April 2011].
  • High Court of the Provinces (Special Provisions) Act No 10 of 1996 [Sri Lanka].
  • Intellectual Property Act No 36 of 2003 [Sri Lanka].
  • Interstellar Starship Services Limited v Epix, Inc., 184 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir., 19 July 1999).
  • Jaconiah, J. (2009) ‘The Requirements for Registration and Protection of Non-Traditional Marks in the European Union and in Tanzania’, IIC, 40(7), 75680.
  • Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks adopted by the Assembly of the Paris Union for the Protection of Industrial Property and the General Assembly of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) at the Thirty-Fourth Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO, 20–29 September 1999 [WIPO/Paris Union Joint Recommendation].
  • Koninklije Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (1999) 44 IPR 551.
  • Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. [United States].
  • LTJ Diffusion SA v Sadas Vertbaudet SA (Advocate General's opinion) C-291/00, [2002] E.T.M.R. 40.
  • LTJ Diffusion SA v Sadas Vertbaudet SA (ECJ Judgement) C-291/00, [2003] E.T.M.R. 83.
  • Mattel, Inc. v 3894207 Canada Inc. 2006 SCC 22, [2006] 1 SCR 772.
  • Matheson, J. A. (2003) ‘The Sweet Smell of a Successful Registration’, Intellectual Property Counselor, [online]. Available at http://www.finnegan.com/resources/articles/articlesdetail.aspx?news=d28c44ca-6b7a-440b-a97d-ee09588e9c02 [Accessed in April 2011].
  • Nichols plc v Registrar of Trade Marks C-404/02, [2005] 1 W.L.R. 1418.
  • Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883) as revised in 1900, 1911, 1925, 1934, 1958 and 1967 and amended in 1979.
  • Philips v Remington C-299/99, [2003] Ch. 159.
  • Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt C-273/00, [2003] Ch. 487.
  • Stoll, P., Busche, J. and Arend, K. (eds.) (2006) WTO–Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Germany.
  • The Economic Times (13 March 2011). ‘ICICI Bank Trademarks Corporate Jingle’. Available at http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-03-13/news/28685973_1_trademarks-jingle-sound-marks [Accessed in April 2011].
  • Thirunavakarasu v Siriwardena and others [1981] 1 Sri LR 185.
  • Toys R Us, Inc. v Feinburg and Guns are We 1998 WL 760219, Oct. 28, 1998, (SDNY).
  • United States—Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology WT/DS350/R (1 October 2008).
  • United States—Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 WT/DS176/AB/R (2 January 2002).
  • United States—Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 WT/DS176/R (6 August 2001) [Panel Report].
  • Wimalaratne v Linganathan and another [1984] 1 Sri LR 247.
  • Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions—und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots—und Segelzubehor Walter Huber C-108/97, [2000] Ch. 523.