Particular thanks to Paul Chen, Art Ward, Steve Wasby, and four anonymous reviewers for their extensive helpful comments. Many thanks, too, to Jeb Barnes, Bill Haltom, Laura Hatcher, Michael McCann, Chandra Hunter Swedlow, and participants in the Western Political Science Association and Law and Society Association annual meetings for their helpful suggestions, and to Teri Bengston, Mariana Cotromanes, and Halima Khan for their excellent research and editorial assistance. The underlying research was directed by Robert A. Kagan, Martin Shapiro, and Laura Stoker; approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of California, Berkeley; and supported by Earhart and Bradley Foundation fellowships; the Survey Research Center and Center for the Study of Law and Society at the University of California, Berkeley; and the Center for Environmental Solutions in the Nicholas School for the Environment and Earth Sciences at Duke University.
Reason for Hope? The Spotted Owl Injunctions and Policy Change
Article first published online: 17 NOV 2009
© 2009 American Bar Foundation.
Law & Social Inquiry
Volume 34, Issue 4, pages 825–867, Fall 2009
How to Cite
Swedlow, B. (2009), Reason for Hope? The Spotted Owl Injunctions and Policy Change. Law & Social Inquiry, 34: 825–867. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01167.x
- Issue published online: 17 NOV 2009
- Article first published online: 17 NOV 2009