Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Subjects and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
Background In ischemic stroke, functional outcomes vary depending on site of intracranial occlusion. We tested the prognostic value of a semiquantitative computed tomography angiography-based clot burden score.
Methods Clot burden score allots major anterior circulation arteries 10 points for presence of contrast opacification on computed tomography angiography. Two points each are subtracted for thrombus preventing contrast opacification in the proximal M1, distal M1 or supraclinoid internal carotid artery and one point each for M2 branches, A1 and infraclinoid internal carotid artery. We retrospectively studied patients with disabling neurological deficits (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≥5) and computed tomography angiography within 24-hours from symptom onset. We analyzed percentages independent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), final infarct Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and parenchymal hematoma rates across categorized clot burden score groups and performed multivariable analysis.
Results We identified 263 patients (median age 73-years, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score 10, onset-to-computed tomography angiography time 165 min). Clot burden score<10 was associated with reduced odds of independent functional outcome (odds ratio 0·09 for clot burden score≤5; odds ratio 0·22 for clot burden score 6–7; odds ratio 0·48 for clot burden score 8–9; all versus clot burden score 10; P<0·02 for all). Lower clot burden scores were associated with lower follow-up Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (P<0·001) and higher parenchymal hematoma rates (P=0·008). Inter-rater reliability for clot burden score was 0·87 (lower 95% confidence interval 0·71) and intra-rater reliability 0·96 (lower 95% confidence interval 0·92).
Conclusion The quantification of intracranial thrombus extent with the clot burden score predicts functional outcome, final infarct size and parenchymal hematoma risk acutely. The score needs external validation and could be useful for patient stratification in stroke trials.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Subjects and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
From current intravenous (i.v.) thrombolysis trials in acute ischemic stroke, only i.v. thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) within 3 h from symptom onset compared with placebo demonstrated an effect on improved functional outcome (1). Vascular imaging was not a prerequisite in any of these trials. However, spontaneous or treatment induced recanalization until 24 h from symptom onset was associated with improved functional outcomes in recent studies (2–4). Patients with intracranial occlusion may therefore represent a target population for thrombolysis in later time windows or for more aggressive treatment protocols like intraarterial (i.a.) thrombolysis (5).
Vascular recanalization rates vary depending on thrombus location with lower rates in proximal versus distal arteries (2, 4, 6–9). Consequently, in anterior circulation stroke, response to thrombolysis and clinical outcomes have been best in patients with distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and worst in terminal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion (4, 8, 10). Suspected mechanisms include larger thrombus burden and impaired collateral blood flow (2, 6, 11).
Quantification of thrombus burden may therefore allow homogenization of patient cohorts who might expect a differential treatment response based on site and extent of intracranial occlusion (9, 12). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is now widely available in emergency departments and can reliably, rapidly and safely diagnose occlusion of major intracranial arteries (13, 14). Still, the impact of CTA-defined occlusion on patient management, outcome and treatment response is debated (9, 12, 15).
The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic value and reliability of a semiquantitative CTA grading system, the clot burden score (CBS), in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that by quantification of intracranial thrombus extent, outcome in terms of functional independence, mortality and final infarct size could be predicted.
Discussion
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Subjects and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
We have shown that a CT-angiography based CBS predicted several clinical and imaging outcome parameters in a large cohort of patients presenting with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. With increasing CBS (i.e. less thrombus burden), patients were significantly more likely to have an independent functional outcome and less likely to die. For example, in a patient with a CBS of 5 or below, the odds of having an independent functional outcome was 10 times lower and the odds of death more than 10 times higher compared with a patient with a CBS of 10. Accordingly, patients with lower CBS had significantly larger final infarcts and were significantly more likely to have parenchymal hematoma formation.
There is considerable evidence that the site of intracranial arterial occlusion is an important predictor of spontaneous or treatment induced recanalization and subsequently good clinical outcome in anterior circulation ischemic stroke (2, 4, 8, 9). In order to compare treatment efficacies of different treatment regimens in randomized stroke trials, objective methods are required to homogenize patient cohorts based on intracranial occlusion status. A recently proposed angiographic grading scheme, based on occlusion site and collateral supply, was associated with initial stroke severity, recanalization rate with i.a. thrombolysis and short term clinical outcome (24, 25). Our results support the concept that not only the occlusion site but the resulting amount of thrombus burden in different vascular segments is a major determinant of stroke severity and outcome in anterior circulation stroke. As an advantage over angiographic scores, CBS does not rely on invasive vascular imaging and is therefore readily available when trying to decide on the best treatment approach in individual patients.
Because of low recanalization rates with i.v. thrombolysis, more aggressive treatment protocols like immediate i.v.–i.a. treatment have been proposed for patients with distal ICA or proximal MCA occlusion (9). This treatment concept is currently tested in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) 3 trial (26). As we did not perform repeat angiographic studies in most patients, we cannot comment on the relationship between thrombus burden and recanalization rates. This may be possible in ongoing trials, which apply CT angiography for patient stratification. A European trial comparing i.v. thrombolysis with i.a. therapy in patients with ICA or MCA occlusion documented on CTA or MRA has recently been proposed (27). Quantification of thrombus burden with the CBS may be helpful to assess whether these more aggressive treatment approaches (such as i.a. therapy) preferentially benefit based on the extent of intracranial thrombus burden (28).
The CBS was associated with the HT rate and particularly parenchymal hematoma rate in our study. Presence of arterial vascular occlusion is commonplace in ischemic stroke patients who have hemorrhagic infarct transformation with or without thrombolysis (12, 29). Potentially, the likelihood of hemorrhagic conversion was triggered by more severe ischemia in patients with lower CBS as indicated by higher baseline NIHSS scores and lower baseline ASPECTS in our study. Furthermore, higher thrombus burden may cause more severe focal hypoperfusion, which was predictive of HT in consecutive stroke patients studied with single-photon emission tomography (29). It needs to be determined if the severity of ischemia, particularly the extent of early ischemic changes on NCCT, and the amount of thrombus burden have an additive or multiplicative joint effect in predicting hemorrhagic complications (30).
Our study has limitations. Clinical outcomes were identified retrospectively based on the chart review of discharge outcome (36%) or in the 3 month follow-up clinic (64%). The CBS was derived from the CTA report. However, subsequent reliability testing revealed excellent inter- and intrarater reliability for CBS among physicians with different levels of training. The CT angiogram may not fully define the thrombus extent because lack of contrast opacification in distal arteries may represent delayed filling (i.e. the scan level being ahead of the dye) rather than intraluminal thrombus. However, this may be an advantage of the score as it may indicate a patient's collateral status which was a predictor of functional outcome in previous angiographic studies (31, 32). Finally, we have shown that the CBS predicted functional outcome in our study population. However, its predictive value may not be present outside this data set and thus needs to be validated in a separate group of patients before it can be considered a complete prediction model.
This study describes a simple and reliable CT-angiography-based CBS, which predicted independent functional outcome and death, and was closely linked to the final infarct size and HT rate in a large cohort of patients with acute anterior circulation stroke. Our results need external validation. Application of CBS to interventional stroke trials comparing i.v. thrombolysis with i.v.–i.a. or immediate i.a. therapy could determine whether more aggressive treatment paradigms may preferentially benefit based on the extent of intracranial thrombus burden.