Version of Record online: 10 MAY 2006
Volume 1, Issue 3, pages 317–334, May 2006
How to Cite
Eklund, M. (2006), Metaontology. Philosophy Compass, 1: 317–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00026.x
- Issue online: 10 MAY 2006
- Version of Record online: 10 MAY 2006
- Philosophy Compass 1/3 (2006): 317–334, 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00026.x
Metaontology – the study of the nature of ontological issues – has flourished in recent years. The focus of this summary will be on some views and arguments that are central to today’s debate. One theme will be that of how seriously to take ontology: whether there is reason to take a skeptical or deflationary attitude toward ontological claims, as theorists like Rudolf Carnap, Hilary Putnam, and Eli Hirsch in different ways have urged. The other theme will be that of the viability of the Fregean and Quinean approaches to ontology that have been and still are central to analytic philosophy.