SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    David Colaço, Wesley Buckwalter, Stephen Stich, Edouard Machery, EPISTEMIC INTUITIONS IN FAKE-BARN THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS, Episteme, 2014, 11, 02, 199

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Hamid Seyedsayamdost, ON NORMATIVITY AND EPISTEMIC INTUITIONS: FAILURE OF REPLICATION, Episteme, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jennifer Nado, Philosophical Expertise, Philosophy Compass, 2014, 9, 9
  4. 4
    Eugen Fischer, Philosophical intuitions, heuristics, and metaphors, Synthese, 2014, 191, 3, 569

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Justin C. Fisher, Pragmatic experimental philosophy, Philosophical Psychology, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Adam Feltz, Edward T. Cokely, The terror of ‘terrorists’: an investigation in experimental applied ethics, Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 2014, 6, 3, 195

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Jennifer Nagel, Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 87, 1
  8. 8
    Paul Silva, Epistemically self-defeating arguments and skepticism about intuition, Philosophical Studies, 2013, 164, 3, 579

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    John Bengson, Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2013, 86, 3
  10. 10
    Steve Clarke, Intuitions as Evidence, Philosophical Expertise and the Developmental Challenge, Philosophical Papers, 2013, 42, 2, 175

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Adam J. Arico, Don Fallis, Lies, damned lies, and statistics: An empirical investigation of the concept of lying, Philosophical Psychology, 2013, 26, 6, 790

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Renia Gasparatou, Naturalising Austin, Acta Analytica, 2013, 28, 3, 329

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Adam Feltz, Pereboom and premises: Asking the right questions in the experimental philosophy of free will, Consciousness and Cognition, 2013, 22, 1, 53

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Adam Feltz, Edward Cokely, Predicting Philosophical Disagreement, Philosophy Compass, 2013, 8, 10
  15. 15
    Billy Dunaway, Anna Edmonds, David Manley, The Folk Probably do Think What you Think They Think, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2013, 91, 3, 421

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Jennifer Wright, Tracking instability in our philosophical judgments: Is it intuitive?, Philosophical Psychology, 2013, 26, 4, 485

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Jeanine Weekes Schroer, Robert Schroer, Two Potential Problems with Philosophical Intuitions: Muddled Intuitions and Biased Intuitions, Philosophia, 2013, 41, 4, 1263

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Jennifer Nagel, Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2012, 85, 3
  19. 19
    S. Matthew Liao, Alex Wiegmann, Joshua Alexander, Gerard Vong, Putting the trolley in order: Experimental philosophy and the loop case, Philosophical Psychology, 2012, 25, 5, 661

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    STEVEN D. HALES, THE FACULTY OF INTUITION, Analytic Philosophy, 2012, 53, 2
  21. 21
    Adam Feltz, Edward T. Cokely, The Philosophical Personality Argument, Philosophical Studies, 2012, 161, 2, 227

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Adam Feltz, Edward T. Cokely, The Virtues of Ignorance, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2012, 3, 3, 335

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Eric Schulz, Edward T. Cokely, Adam Feltz, Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the expertise defense, Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, 20, 4, 1722

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    N. ÁNGEL PINILLOS, NICK SMITH, G. SHYAM NAIR, PETER MARCHETTO, CECILEA MUN, Philosophy's New Challenge: Experiments and Intentional Action, Mind & Language, 2011, 26, 1
  25. 25
    A.-S. Malmgren, Rationalism and the Content of Intuitive Judgements, Mind, 2011, 120, 478, 263

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Ioannis Votsis, Saving the intuitions: polylithic reference, Synthese, 2011, 180, 2, 121

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Joshua Alexander, Ronald Mallon, Jonathan M. Weinberg, Accentuate the Negative, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010, 1, 2, 297

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Jonathan M. Weinberg, Chad Gonnerman, Cameron Buckner, Joshua Alexander, Are philosophers expert intuiters?, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 3, 331

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Tamler Sommers, Experimental Philosophy and Free Will, Philosophy Compass, 2010, 5, 2
  30. 30
    Benoit Hardy-Vallée, Benoît Dubreuil, Folk Epistemology as Normative Social Cognition, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010, 1, 4, 483

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Joachim Horvath, How (not) to react to experimental philosophy, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 4, 447

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Joachim Horvath, Thomas Grundmann, Introduction: Experimental Philosophy and Its Critics, Parts 1 and 2, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 3, 283

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Joshua Alexander, Is experimental philosophy philosophically significant?, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 3, 377

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Jennifer Cole Wright, On intuitional stability: The clear, the strong, and the paradigmatic, Cognition, 2010, 115, 3, 491

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Joseph Shieber, On the nature of thought experiments and a core motivation of experimental philosophy, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 4, 547

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Thomas Grundmann, Some hope for intuitions: A reply to Weinberg, Philosophical Psychology, 2010, 23, 4, 481

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Simon Cullen, Survey-Driven Romanticism, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2010, 1, 2, 275

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Jennifer L. Zamzow, Shaun Nichols, VARIATIONS IN ETHICAL INTUITIONS, Philosophical Issues, 2009, 19, 1
  39. 39
    S. Matthew Liao, A defense of intuitions, Philosophical Studies, 2008, 140, 2, 247

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Thomas W. Polger, H2O, ‘Water’, and Transparent Reduction, Erkenntnis, 2008, 69, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Chad Gonnerman, Reading Conflicted Minds: An Empirical Follow-up to Knobe and Roedder, Philosophical Psychology, 2008, 21, 2, 193

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Jennifer Nagel, Epistemic Intuitions, Philosophy Compass, 2007, 2, 6
  43. 43
    TAMAR SZABÓ GENDLER, Philosophical Thought Experiments, Intuitions, and Cognitive Equilibrium, Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 2007, 31, 1
  44. 44
    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Eddy Nahmias, THE PAST AND FUTURE OF EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY, Philosophical Explorations, 2007, 10, 2, 123

    CrossRef