Self-Knowledge: Rationalism vs. Empiricism
Article first published online: 31 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00125.x
© 2008 The Author
Additional Information
How to Cite
Zimmerman, A. Z. (2008), Self-Knowledge: Rationalism vs. Empiricism. Philosophy Compass, 3: 325–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00125.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 31 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 31 JAN 2008
- Philosophy Compass 3/2 (2008): 325–352, 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00125.x
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Recent philosophical discussions of self-knowledge have focused on basic cases: our knowledge of our own thoughts, beliefs, sensations, experiences, preferences, and intentions. Empiricists argue that we acquire this sort of self-knowledge through inner perception; rationalists assign basic self-knowledge an even more secure source in reason and conceptual understanding. I try to split the difference. Although our knowledge of our own beliefs and thoughts is conceptually insured, our knowledge of our experiences is relevantly like our perceptual knowledge of the external world.

1747-9991/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=032b56081ee478273a6634865c2d7a0d06542e0e)
1747-9991/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=7c721cd4a9e8974fa9e92aaae829aeaffb3daa5f)
