Defining Physicalism
Article first published online: 24 JUL 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00163.x
© 2008 The Author. Journal Compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ney, A. (2008), Defining Physicalism. Philosophy Compass, 3: 1033–1048. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00163.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 29 SEP 2008
- Article first published online: 24 JUL 2008
- Philosophy Compass 3/5 (2008): 1033–1048, 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00163.x
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
This article discusses recent disagreements over the correct formulation of physicalism. Although there appears to be a consensus outside those who discuss the issue that physicalists believe that what exists is what is countenanced by physics, as we will see, this orthodoxy faces an important puzzle now frequently referred to as ‘Hempel's Dilemma’. After surveying the historical trajectory from Enlightenment-era materialism to contemporary physicalism, I examine several mainstream approaches that respond to Hempel's dilemma, and the benefits and drawbacks of each.

