Correspondence: Department of Philosophy, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458, USA. Email: sgrimm@fordham.edu.
“The Value of Understanding”
Article first published online: 2 FEB 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00460.x
© 2012 The Author. Philosophy Compass © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Grimm, S. (2012), “The Value of Understanding”. Philosophy Compass, 7: 103–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00460.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 2 FEB 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Over the last several years a number of leading philosophers – including Catherine Elgin, Linda Zagzebski, Jonathan Kvanvig, and Duncan Pritchard – have grown increasingly dissatisfied with the contemporary focus on knowledge in epistemology and have attempted to “recover” the notion of understanding. According to some of these philosophers, in fact, understanding deserves not just to be recovered, but to supplant knowledge as the focus of epistemological inquiry. This entry considers some of the main reasons why philosophers have taken understanding to be more valuable than knowledge, focusing on claims that it is more transparent, that it better reflects or mirrors the world, and that it is a greater intellectual achievement.

