SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  1. References
  2. Cases cited
  • Aristotle (1953) The Ethics of Aristotle – The Nicomachean Ethics (J.A.K.Thomson trans.). Macmillan Co., New York.
  • Bartlett KT (1990) Feminist Legal Methods. Harvard Law Review 103, 829888.
  • Bentham J (1931) Principles of the Penal Code, Book IV, Chapter XV. In: OgdenCK (ed.) The Theory of Legislation, pp. 425427. (Richard Hildreth from Etienne Dumont trans.) Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.
  • Blake W (1814) Annotations to Sir Joshua Reynolds’s Discourses. London.
  • Buzbee WW (2005) Contextual Environmental Federalism. New York University Environmental Law Journal 14, 108129.
  • Cohen LJ (1977) The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Cripps JA Jr (2001) Dialing While Driving: The Battle Over Cell Phone Use on America’s Roadways. Gonzaga Law Review 37, 89120.
  • Dancy J (1993) Moral Reasons. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
  • Davies SL (1998) The Jurisprudence of Willfulness: An Evolving Theory of Excusable Ignorance. Duke Law Journal 48, 341427.
  • Ellickson R (1986) Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review 38, 623687.
  • Finkelstein C (2000) Positivism and the Notion of an Offense. California Law Review 88, 335394.
  • Gilligan C (1993) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. USA.
  • Harcourt BE (2006) Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Hooker B, Little MO (eds) (2000) Moral Particularism. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Horwitt D (2002) Driving While Distracted: How Should Legislators Regulate Cell Phone Use Behind the Wheel? Journal of Legislation 28, 185212.
  • Howard PK (1994) The Death of Common Sense. Random House, New York.
  • Husak DN (1998) Reasonable Risk Creation and Overinclusive Legislation. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1, 599626.
  • Husak DN (2004) Guns and Drugs: Case Studies on the Principled Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Law and Philosophy 23, 437493.
  • King NJ, Klein SR (2001) Essential Elements. Vanderbilt Law Review 54, 14671558.
  • LaFave W (2000) Criminal Law, Vol. 35, 3rd edn. West Group, St Paul, MN.
  • Loftus EF (1996) Eyewitness Testimony. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Loftus EF, Doyle JM (1997) Eyewitness Testimony: Civil and Criminal. Lexis Law Publishing, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Macaulay S (2000) Relational Contracts Floating on a Sea of Custom?: Thoughts About the Ideas of Ian MacNeil and Lisa Bernstein. Northwestern University Law Review 94, 775804.
  • Note, Driving While Distracted: How Should Legislators Regulate Cell Phone Use Behind the Wheel? Journal of Legislation 28, 185 (2002).
  • Note, Irrebuttable Presumptions: An Illusory Analysis. Stanford Law Review 27, 449 (1975).
  • Note, The Irrebuttable Presumption Doctrine in the Supreme Court. Harvard Law Review 87, 1534 (1974).
  • Schachter D (1996) Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past. Basic Books, New York.
  • Schauer F (1991) Playing By the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Schauer F, Zeckhauser R (1996) On the Degree of Confidence for Adverse Decisions. Journal of Legal Studies 25, 2752.
  • Semeraro S (2003) The Antitrust-Telecom Connection. San Diego Law Review 40, 555610.
  • Shaviro D (1989) Statistical-Probability Evidence and the Appearance of Justice. Harvard Law Review 103, 530554.
  • Stangor C (1995) Content and Application Inaccuracy in Social Stereotyping. In: LeeY-T, JussimLJ, McCauleyCR (eds) Stereotype Accuracy: Toward Appreciating Group Differences, pp. 275292. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Sunstein CR (1999) One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Thomson JJ (1986) Liability and Individualized Evidence. Law and Contemporary Problems 49, 199219.
  • Thurow L (1970) Equity Versus Efficiency in Law Enforcement. Public Policy 18, 451459.
  • Tribe LH (1971) Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process. Harvard Law Review 84, 13291393.
  • Ullman-Margalit E (1983) On Presumption. Journal of Philosophy 80, 143163.
  • Ullman-Margalit E, Margalit A (1982) Analyticity by Way of Presumption. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12, 435452.
  • Wells GL, Bradford AL (1998) “Good, You Identified the Suspect:” Feedback to Eyewitnesses Distorts Their Reports of the Witnessing Experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 83, 360376.
  • Wertheimer A (1978) Punishing the Innocent – Unintentionally. Inquiry 20, 4565.
  • Wilson JQ, Kelling GL (1982) Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety. The Atlantic Monthly 249, 2937.
  • Zaring D (2006) Best Practices. New York University Law Review 81, 294350.
  • Zelenak L (1986) Thinking About Nonliteral Interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code. North Carolina Law Review 64, 623676.

Cases cited

  1. References
  2. Cases cited
  • Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
  • Bunis v. Conway, 234 N.Y.S. 2d 435 (1962).
  • Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1974).
  • Delmonico v. State, 155 So. 2d 368 Fla. 1963).
  • D.P. v. Florida, 705 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
  • Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985).
  • In the Interest of T.C., a Child, 573 So.2d 121 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
  • Kaminsky v. Hertz Corp., 288 N.W.2d 426, 288 N.W.2d 426 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
  • Kinney v. State, 927 P.2d 1289 (Alas. App. 1996).
  • Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (1975).
  • Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 (1977).
  • People v. Atencia, 446 N.E.2d 1243 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 1983).
  • People v. Bright, 520 N.E.2d 1355, 526 N.Y.S.2d 66 (1988).
  • People v. Bunis (1961).
  • People v. Lee, 448 N.E.2d 1328, 462 N.Y.S.2d 417 (1983).
  • People v. Munoz, 432 N.E.2d 370 (Ill. App. 3rd Dist. 1982).
  • People v. Salazar, 672 N.E.2d 803 (Ill. App. 1st Dist. 1996).
  • People v. Wright, 740 N.E.2d 755 (Ill. 2000).
  • Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 (1979).
  • Smith v. Rapid Transit, 58 N.E.2d 754 (Mass, 1945).
  • State v. Horton, 51 S.E. 945 (N.C. 1905).
  • State v. Rolle, 560 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 1990).
  • State v. Saiez, 489 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1986).
  • United States Department of Agriculture v. Murry, 413 U.S. 508 (1973).
  • United States v. Andrino, 501 F.2d 1373, 1378 (9th Cir. 1974).
  • United States v. Fior D’Italia, 536 U.S. 238 (2002).
  • United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601 (1971).
  • United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (1940).
  • United States v. Young, 568 F.2d 588, 589 (8th Cir. 1978).
  • Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U.S. 441 (1973).
  • Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 (1975).