SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arterton FC (1987) Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy? Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Balla SJ (2005) Between Commenting and Negotiation: The Contours of Public Participation in Agency Rulemaking. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 1, 5994.
  • Barber B (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Brandon BH, Carlitz RD (2003) Online Rulemaking and Other Tools for Strengthening Our Civil Infrastructure. Administrative Law Review 54, 14211478.
  • Coglianese C (1997) Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking. Duke Law Journal 46, 12551349.
  • Coglianese C (2003) The Internet and Citizen Participation in Rulemaking. Available from URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=421161/
  • Coglianese C (2004) E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and Regulatory Policy: New Directions in Digital Government Research. Regulatory Policy Program Report No. RPP-05 (2004). Available from URL: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/press/pdfs/E-Rulemaking_Report.pdf/
  • Coglianese C (2006) Citizen Participation in Rulemaking: Past, Present, and Future. Duke Law Journal 55, 943968.
  • De Figueiredo JM (2006) E-Rulemaking: Bringing Data to Theory at the Federal Communications Commission. Duke Law Journal 55, 969993.
  • Department of Transportation (DOT), US Coast Guard (1996) Financial Responsibility for Water Pollution (Vessels). Federal Register 61, 92649307.
  • Dryzek JS (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Emery F, Emery A (2005) A Modest Proposal: Improve E-Rulemaking by Improving Comments. Administrative and Regulatory Law News 8, 89.
  • Fountain JE (2001) Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Francis W (1997) Electronic Rulemaking: Outline of Opportunities and Issues. Available from URL: http://www.policynet.com/ermoutline.htm/
  • Golden MM (1998) Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8, 245270.
  • Grossman LK (1995) The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. Viking Penguin, New York.
  • Hamilton JT, Schroeder CH (1994) Strategic Regulators and the Choice of Rulemaking Procedures: The Selection of Formal vs. Informal Rules in Enforcing Hazardous Waste Laws. Law and Contemporary Problems 57, 111160.
  • Harter PJ (1982) Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise. Georgetown Law Journal 71, 1113.
  • Hill KA, Hughes JE (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.
  • Johnson SM (1998) The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information Through the Internet. Administrative Law Review 50, 277337.
  • Kamarck EC, Nye RS Jr (eds) (1999) Democracy.com ?: Governance in a Networked World. Hollis Publishing Company, Hollis, NH.
  • Kerwin CM (2003) Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy, 3rd edn. CQ Press, Washington, DC.
  • Kippen G, Jenkins G (2004) The Challenge of E-Democracy for Political Parties. In: ShanePM (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, 253265. Routledge, New York.
  • Margolis M, Resnick D (2000) Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace “Revolution.” Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Meers CS (2001) Department of Transportation’s Docket Management System. Available from URL: http://www.diggov.org/library/library/dgo2001/DGOMAC/MEDIA/MEERS.PDF/
  • Norris P (2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Noveck BS (2004) The Electronic Revolution in Rulemaking. Emory Law Journal 53, 433518.
  • Otis R (2004) Federal eRulemaking Initiative. Available from URL: http://sparky.harvard.edu/m-rebg/rpp/erulemaking/papers_reports/Otis_eRule_ABA_v3_final_10_21_04.pdf
  • Rossi J (1997) Participation Run Amok: The Costs of Mass Participation for Deliberative Agency Decisionmaking. Northwestern University Law Review 92, 173249.
  • Samuel A (2004) Hacktivism and the Future of Democratic Discourse. In: ShanePM (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, 123140. Routledge, New York.
  • Schlosberg D, Zavestoski S, Shulman S (2005) “To Submit a Form or Not to Submit a Form, That is the (Real) Question:” Deliberation and Mass Participation in U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking. Available from URL: http://erulemaking.ucsur.pitt.edu/doc/papers/SDEST_stanford_precon.pdf/
  • Shane PM (2004) Introduction: The Prospects for Electronic Democracy. In: ShanePM (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, xixx. Routledge, New York.
  • Shane PM (2005) Turning GOLD into EPG: Lessons from Low-Tech Democratic Experimentalism for Electronic Rulemaking and Other Ventures in Cyberdemocracy. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 1, 147170.
  • Shapiro S (2006) Presidents and Process: A Comparison of the Regulatory Process under the Clinton and Bush (43) Administrations. Available from URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=933678#PaperDownload/
  • Shulman SW (2003) An Experiment in Digital Government at the United States National Organic Program. Agriculture and Human Values 20, 253265.
  • Shulman SW (2004) The Internet Still Might (but Probably Won’t) Change Everything: Stakeholder Views on the Future of Electronic Rulemaking. Available from URL: http://erulemaking.ucsur.pitt.edu/doc/reports/e-rulemaking_final.pdf/
  • Shulman SW, Schlosberg D, Zavestoski S, Courard-Hauri D (2003) Electronic Rulemaking: A Public Participation Research Agenda for the Social Sciences. Social Science Computer Review 21, 117.
  • Stanley JW, Weare C (2004) The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation: Evidence From an Agency Online Discussion Forum. Administration & Society 36, 528552.
  • Stanley JW, Weare C, Musso J (2004) Participation, Deliberative Democracy, and the Internet: Lessons from a National Forum on Commercial Vehicle Safety. In: ShanePM (ed.) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, 167180. Routledge, New York.
  • Sunstein C (2001) Republic.com . Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Susskind L, McMahon G (1985) The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking. Yale Journal on Regulation 3, 133165.
  • US General Accounting Office (2000) Federal Rulemaking: Agencies’ Use of Information Technology to Facilitate Public Participation. Available from URL: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/gg00135r.pdf/
  • US General Accounting Office (2003) Electronic Rulemaking: Efforts to Facilitate Public Participation Can Be Improved. Available from URL: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03901.pdf/
  • West WF (2004) Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Policy Analysis. Public Administration Review 64, 6679.
  • Yackee SW (2006) Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch: The Influence of Interest Group Comments on Federal Agency Rulemaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16, 103124.
  • Yang H, Callan J, Shulman S (2006) Next Steps in Near-Duplicate Detection for eRulemaking. Available from URL: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~callan/Papers/dgo06-huiyang.pdf/