SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aiken L, West S (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Australian Taxation Office (1998) Improving Tax Compliance in the Cash Economy. Cash Economy Task Force, Australian Taxation Office, Canberra.
  • Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsible Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Bardach E, Kagan R (1982) Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
  • Bersoff DM (1999) Why Good People Sometimes Do Bad Things: Motivated Reasoning and Unethical Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25, 2839.
  • Black D (1976) The Behavior of Law. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Black J (2001) Managing Discretion. Paper presented at the Australian Law Commission Conference on ‘Penalties: Policies and Practice in Government Regulation’, Jun 2001, Sydney.
  • Black J (2008) Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes. Regulation and Governance 2, 137164.
  • Bogardus ES (1928) Immigration and Race Attitudes. DC Heath and Company, Boston.
  • Braithwaite J, Makkai T (1994) Trust and Compliance. Policing and Society 4, 112.
  • Braithwaite J, Makkai T, Braithwaite V (2007) Regulating Aged Care: Ritualism and the New Pyramid. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  • Braithwaite V (1995) Games of Engagement: Postures within the Regulatory Community. Law and Policy 17, 225255.
  • Braithwaite V (2003) Dancing with Tax Authorities: Motivational Postures and Non-compliant Actions. In: BraithwaiteV (ed) Taxing Democracy, pp. 1540. Ashgate, Aldershot.
  • Braithwaite V, Reinhart M, Mearns M, Graham R (2001) Preliminary Findings from the Community Hopes, Fears and Actions Survey. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 3. The Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Brockner J, Wiesenfeld BM (1996) An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120, 189208.
  • Burby R, Paterson R (1993) Improving Compliance with State Environmental Regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12, 753772.
  • Clawson R, Kegler E, Waltenberg E (2001) The Legitimacy-conferring Authority of the US Supreme Court. American Political Research 29, 566651.
  • Easton D (1958) The Perception of Authority and Political Change. In: FriedrichCJ (ed) Authority, pp. 170196. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Fehr E, Rockenbach B (2003) Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism. Nature 422, 137140.
  • Feld LP, Frey BS (2007) Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation. Law and Policy 29, 102120.
  • Feldman Y, Lobel O (2008) Decentralized Enforcement in Organizations: An Experimental Approach. Regulation and Governance 2, 165192.
  • Gerstein R (1970) The Practice of Fidelity to the Law. Law and Society Review 4, 479493.
  • Grabosky P, Braithwaite J (1986) Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
  • Hamilton S (2003) Putting the Client First: The Emerging Copernican Revolution of Tax Administration. Tax Notes International 29, 569576.
  • Harris N, McCrae J (2005) Perceptions of Tax and Participation in the Cash Economy: Examining the Role of Motivational Postures in Small Businesses. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 80. The Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Hartner M, Rechberger S, Kirchler E, Schabmann A (2008) Procedural Fairness and Tax Compliance. Economic Analysis and Policy 38, 137152.
  • Kagan RA, Scholz JT (1984) The Criminology of the Corporation and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies. In: HawkinsK, ThomasJM (eds) Enforcing Regulation, pp. 6795. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.
  • Kruttschnitt C (1980) Social Status and Sentences of Female Offenders. Law and Society Review 15, 247266.
  • Lake DA (2006) Relational Authority in the Modern World: Towards a Positive Theory of Legitimacy. Paper presented for the Workshop on Legitimacy in the Modern World, University of California, San Diego, 8–9 December 2006.
  • Leventhal GS (1980) What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. In: GergenK, GreenbergM, WillisR (eds) Social Exchange, pp. 2755. Plenum, New York.
  • Levi M (1997) Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Maxfield MG, Babbie E (2008) Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology, 5th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
  • McBarnet D (2003) When Compliance Is Not the Solution but the Problem: From Changes in Law to Changes in Attitude. In: BraithwaiteV (ed) Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion, pp. 229244. Ashgate, Aldershot.
  • McGraw K, Scholz J (1991) Appeals to Civic Virtue Versus Attention to Self-interest: Effects on Tax Compliance. Law and Society Review 25, 471493.
  • Murphy K (2004) The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders. Law and Human Behavior 28, 187210.
  • Murphy K (2005a) Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Tax Non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society 32, 562589.
  • Murphy K (2005b) Turning Resistance into Compliance: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Tax Scheme Investors. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 77. The Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Murphy K (2005c) To Persuade or to Punish? Developing a More Effective Enforcement Strategy for Social Security Compliance. Report prepared for the Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Affairs. Regulatory Institutions Network, Research School of Social Sciences. The Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Murphy K, Hinds L, Fleming J (2008) Encouraging Public Cooperation and Support for Police. Policing and Society 18, 138157.
  • New Zealand Inland Revenue (2001) Inland Revenue Business Plan: The Way Forward 2001 Onwards. New Zealand Inland Revenue, Wellington.
  • Reisig MD, Bratton J, Gertz M (2007) The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-based Policing Measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34, 10051028.
  • Scholz JT (1991) Cooperative Regulatory Enforcement and the Politics of Administrative Effectiveness. American Political Science Review 85, 115136.
  • Scholz JT, Lubell M (1998) Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science 42, 398417.
  • Skitka L (2002) Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Model of Justice Reasoning. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 28, 588597.
  • Skogan WG, Frydl K (2004) Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  • Sykes G, Matza D (1957) Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review 22, 488498.
  • Thornberry TP, Krohn MD (2000) The Self-report Method for Measuring Delinquency and Crime. In: DuffeeD (ed) Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice: Criminal Justice 2000, Vol. 4, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
  • Thurman QC, St John C, Riggs L (1984) Neutralization and Tax Evasion: How Effective Would a Moral Appeal be in Improving Compliance to Tax Laws? Law and Policy 6, 309327.
  • Tyler TR (1997) The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1, 323345.
  • Tyler TR (2006) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Tyler TR, Darley J (2000) Building a Law-abiding Society: Taking Public Views about Morality and the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities into Account When Formulating Substantive Law. Hofstra Law Review 28, 707739.
  • UK Inland Revenue (2001) Managing Customer Relationships: What Does Compliance Mean in The Future? Inland Revenue Workshop, June 2001.
  • UK Inland Revenue (2002) The Government's Expenditure Plans 2002–2004. Inland Revenue, London.
  • Unnever JD, Colvin M, Cullen FT (2004) Crime and Coercion: A Test of Core Theoretical Propositions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 41, 244268.
  • Wenzel M (2002) The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers' Identity. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 629645.
  • Wenzel M (2006) A Letter from the Tax Office: Compliance Effects of Informational and Interpersonal Justice. Social Justice Research 19, 345364.
  • Winter SC, May PJ (2001) Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20, 675698.