SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alschuler A (1968) The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review 30(1), 50112.
  • Arantes R (2002) Ministério Público e Política no Brasil. Editora Sumaré. FAPESP, São Paulo.
  • Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Bardach E, Kagan R (1982) Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Barkow R (2009) The Prosecutor as Regulatory Agency. Working Paper 09-30, New York University Law and Economics Research Paper Series. New York, NY.
  • Berman G, Feinblatt J (2005) Good Courts: The Case for Problem-solving Courts. The New Press, New York.
  • Bibas S (2009) Prosecutorial Regulation Versus Prosecutorial Accountability. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157, 9591016.
  • Braithwaite J (2005) Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies. World Development 34, 884898.
  • Cavalcanti RB (1998) Cidadania e Acesso à Justiça: O Caso das Promotorias de Justiça da Comunidade. Unpublished Masters's thesis, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP.
  • Chade J (2009) Muro do Rio Constrange Ministro na ONU. O Estado de São Paulo, 7 de Maio, (Caderno Nacional, A8).
  • Corregedoria Geral do Ministério Público (2006) Aviso N°03/06- CGMP, de 2 de Março de 2006. Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, Seção I, Poder Executivo 116, 42, 7 March.
  • Coslovsky S (2008) Respeito às Normas e Crescimento Econômico: Como Promotores Públicos Garantem o Cumprimento das Leis e Promovem o Crescimento Econômico no Brasil. Texto para Discussão 1355, IPEA, Rio de Janeiro.
  • Crawford C (2008) Defending Public Prosecutors and Defining Brazil's (Environmental) “Public Interest”: A Review of Lesley McAllister's Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil. The George Washington International Law Review 40, 619647.
  • Davis A (2001) The American Prosecutor: Independence, Power and the Threat of Tyranny. Iowa Law Review 86, 393465.
  • Davis A (2007) Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Davis KC (1969) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, LA.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (2001) Beyond Compliance: Supplemental Environmental Projects. Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (2248A), EPA. Washington DC.
  • Fabbrini R (2002) O Ministério Público e a Crise Orçamentária. Edições APMP, São Paulo.
  • Fang C, Lee J, Schilling M (2010) Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning. Organization Science 21, 625642.
  • Feldman M (1992) Social Limits to Discretion: An Organizational Perspective. In: HawkinsK (ed.) The Uses of Discretion, pp. 161183. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Ferraz AAC (2003) Um Novo Modelo de Gestão para o Ministério Público. Edições APMP, São Paulo.
  • Garrett B (2007) Structural Reform Prosecution. Virginia Law Review 93, 853957.
  • Goldstock R (1991) The Prosecutor as Problem Solver. Occasional Paper Series, The Center for Research in Crime and Justice of the New York University School of Law, New York, NY.
  • Gormley JWT (1998) Regulatory Enforcement Styles. Political Research Quarterly 51, 363383.
  • Gupta A, Smith K, Shalley C (2006) The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 49, 693706.
  • Heimer C (1998) The Routinization of Responsiveness: Regulatory Compliance and the Construction of Organizational Routines. Working Paper 9801, American Bar Foundation, Chicago IL.
  • Hochstetler K, Keck M (2007) Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  • Hutter BM (1989) Variations in Regulatory Enforcement Styles. Law and Policy 11, 153174.
  • Johnson DT (2001) The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Kerche F (2007) Autonomia e Discricionariedade do Ministério Público no Brasil. Dados 50, 259279. Rio de Janeiro.
  • Levine K (2007) Can Prosecutors Be Social Workers? Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 40, 125151.
  • Lipsky M (1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Basic Books, New York.
  • McAllister LK (2008) Making Law Matter: Environmental Protection and Legal Institutions in Brazil. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  • McCoy C (2003) The Politics of Problem-solving: An Overview of the Origins and Development of Therapeutic Courts. American Criminal Law Review 40, 15131534.
  • MacDuffie JP (1997) The Road to Root Cause: Problem-solving at Three Auto-assembly Plants. Management Science 43, 479502.
  • Macedo RP Jr (2010) Uma Plataforma Eletrônica para Avaliação de Merecimento? A Conveniência de um Lattes para os Promotores. Working Paper, Associação Paulista do Ministério Público. São Paulo.
  • March J (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2(1), 7187.
  • May PJ, Burby RJ (1998) Making Sense of Regulatory Enforcement. Law & Policy 20(2), 157182.
  • May PJ, Wood RS (2003) At the Regulatory Front Lines: Inspectors' Enforcement Styles and Regulatory Compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13, 117139.
  • Ministério da Justiça (2006) Diagnóstico Ministério Público dos Estados. Secretaria da Reforma do Judiciário, Brasilia.
  • Morrill C, Zald MN, Rao H (2003) Covert Political Conflict in Organizations: Challenges from Below. Annual Review of Sociology 29, 391415.
  • Mueller B (2006) Who Enforces Enforcement? Can Public Prosecutors in Brazil Break the Endless Regress? Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Brasilia. Brasilia.
  • Nielsen VL, Parker C (2009) Testing Responsive Regulation in Regulatory Enforcement. Regulation & Governance 3, 376399.
  • Nóbrega F (2007) The New Institutional Design of the Procuracy in Brazil: Multiplicity of Veto Players and Institutional Vulnerability. ALACDE Annual Papers, Berkeley Program in Law and Economics. Berkeley, CA.
  • Paul G (2007) Os Meninos Superpoderosos. Revista Exame, edição 894, ano 41, 6 Junho. Available from URL: http://exame.abril.com.br/revista-exame/edicoes/0894/economia/noticias/os-meninos-superpoderosos-m0130147
  • Pires R (2009) Estilos de Implementação e Resultados de Políticas Públicas: Fiscais do Trabalho e o Cumprimento da Lei Trabalhista no Brasil. Dados 52, 734769.
  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management 34, 375409.
  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman M (2009) Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science 20, 685695.
  • Remington FJ (1993) The Decision to Charge, the Decision to Convict on a Plea of Guilty, and the Impact of Sentence Structure on Prosecution Practices. In: OhlinLE, RemingtonFJ (eds) Discretion in Criminal Justice: The Tension Between Individualization and Uniformity, pp. 73133. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
  • Repenning N, Sterman J (2001) Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement. California Management Review 43, 6488.
  • Sabel C (2006) A Real Time Revolution in Routines. In: HeckscherC, AdlerP (eds) The Firm as a Collaborative Community, pp. 105156. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  • Sadek MT, Cavalcanti RB (2003) The New Brazilian Public Prosecution: An Agent of Accountability. In: MainwaringS, WelnaC (eds) Democratic Accountability in Latin America, pp. 201228. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Scholz JT (1984) Voluntary Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement. Law & Policy 6, 385404.
  • Scholz JT (1991) Cooperative Regulatory Enforcement and the Politics of Administrative Effectiveness. American Political Science Review 85, 115136.
  • Scholz JT, Gray W (1997) Can Government Facilitate Cooperation? An Informational Model of OSHA Enforcement. American Journal of Political Science 41, 693717.
  • Silbey S (19801981) Case Processing: Consumer Protection in an Attorney General's Office. Law & Society Review 15, 849881.
  • Silbey S, Bittner E (1982) The Availability of Law. Law and Policy Quarterly 4(4), 399434.
  • Silbey S, Huising R, Coslovsky SV (2009) The Sociological Citizen: Relational Interdependence in Law and Organizations. L'Année Sociologique 59(1), 201229.
  • Silva CA (2001) Promotores de Justiça e Novas Formas de Atuação em Defesa de Interesses Sociais e Coletivos. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais 16, 127144.
  • Sparrow M (2000) The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems, and Managing Compliance. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
  • Sparrow M (2008) The Character of Harms: Operational Challenges in Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Taylor M, Buranelli V (2007) Ending Up in Pizza: Accountability as a Problem of Institutional Arrangement in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 49(1), 5987.
  • Tushman M, O'Reilly C (1997) Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review 38, 834.
  • Vorenberg J (1981) Decent Restraint of Prosecutorial Power. Harvard Law Review 94(7), 15211573.
  • Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic Books, New York, NY.
  • Winship C (2006) Policy Analysis as Puzzle-solving. In: GoodinRE, ReinM (eds) Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 109123. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Winship C, Berrien J (1999) Lessons Learned from Boston's Police Community Collaboration. Federal Probation 63, 2532.
  • Winter S, May PJ (2000) Reconsidering Styles of Regulatory Enforcement: Patterns in Danish Agro-environmental Inspection. Law and Policy 22, 143173.
  • Zald MN, Berger MA (1978) Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'etat, Insurgency, and Mass Movements. American Journal of Sociology 83, 823861.