Get access

From norms to programs: The United Nations Global Compact and global governance

Authors

  • Daniel Berliner,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
      Daniel Berliner, Department of Political Science, University of Washington, 101 Gowen Hall, Box 353530, Seattle, WA 98195-3530, USA. Email: dberlinr@uw.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Aseem Prakash

    1. Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Daniel Berliner, Department of Political Science, University of Washington, 101 Gowen Hall, Box 353530, Seattle, WA 98195-3530, USA. Email: dberlinr@uw.edu

Abstract

Norms shape policy when they get translated into concrete programs. What if a widely shared norm gets translated into a weak program? How might this influence the program's legitimacy? We examine these issues in the context of the United Nations Global Compact, a voluntary program that embodies the widely shared norm of corporate responsibility. While both international intergovernmental organization (IGO) and international non-governmental organization (INGO) networks support this norm, they differ on the adequacy of the Compact's program design. We explore how this tension affects the diffusion of the Compact across countries, which vary in their levels of embeddedness in IGO and INGO networks. Our findings suggest that embeddedness in IGO networks encourages adoption, while embeddedness in INGO networks discourages it. Our analysis provides important lessons for sponsors of voluntary governance mechanisms. Widespread support for a norm does not automatically ensure support for a program that claims to embody it.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary