The papers included in this special issue are part of a larger project on the “Regulatory State of the South.” This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada. The papers have been strengthened by an opportunity for contributors to interact at a workshop held in New Delhi in January 2011. We are grateful to IDRC for their support. The project has also been supported by several Research Associates. We acknowledge the work of Carlo Bonura, Katha Kartiki, Shibani Ghosh and Shilpi Srivastava who contributed to both the substance and coordination of this project.
Understanding the Rise of the Regulatory State in the South. Guest Editors: Navroz K. Dubash and Bronwen Morgan
Understanding the rise of the regulatory state of the South*
Article first published online: 5 JUN 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Regulation & Governance
Volume 6, Issue 3, pages 261–281, September 2012
How to Cite
Dubash, N. K. and Morgan, B. (2012), Understanding the rise of the regulatory state of the South. Regulation & Governance, 6: 261–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01146.x
- Issue published online: 20 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 5 JUN 2012
- Accepted for publication 7 April 2012.
- comparative political economy;
This paper, and the special issue it introduces, explores whether, and how, the rise of the regulatory state of the South, and its implications for processes of governance, are distinct from cases in the North. With the exception of a small but growing body of work on Latin America, most work on the regulatory state deals with the US or Europe, or takes a relatively undifferentiated “legal transplant” approach to the developing world. We use the term “the South” to invoke shared histories of many countries, rather than as a geographic delimiter, even while acknowledging continued and growing diversity among these countries, particularly in their engagement with globalization.
We suggest that three aspects of this common context are important in characterizing the rise of the regulatory state of the South. The first contextual element is the presence of powerful external pressures, especially from international financial institutions, to adopt the institutional innovation of regulatory agencies in infrastructure sectors. The result is often an incomplete engagement with and insufficient embedding of regulatory agencies within local political and institutional context. A second is the greater intensity of redistributive politics in settings where infrastructure services are of extremely poor quality and often non-existent. The resultant politics of distribution draws in other actors, such as the courts and civil society; regulation is too important to be left to the regulators. The third theme is that of limited state capacity, which we suggest has both “thin” and “thick” dimensions. Thin state capacity issues include prosaic concerns of budget, personnel and training; thick issues address the growing pressures on the state to manage multiple forms of engagement with diverse stakeholders in order to balance competing concerns of growth, efficiency and redistribution.
These three themes provide a framework for this special issue, and for the case studies that follow. We focus on regulatory agencies in infrastructure sectors (water, electricity and telecoms) as a particular expression of the regulatory state, though we acknowledge that the two are by no means synonymous. The case studies are drawn from India, Colombia, Brazil, and the Philippines, and engage with one or more of these contextual elements. The intent is to draw out common themes that characterize a “regulatory state of the South,” while remaining sensitive to the variations in level of economic development and political institutional contexts within “the South.”