SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Eli Amson, Christian de Muizon, A new durophagous phocid (Mammalia: Carnivora) from the late Neogene of Peru and considerations on monachine seals phylogeny, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2014, 12, 5, 523

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Lauren B. Debey, Nicholas D. Pyenson, Osteological correlates and phylogenetic analysis of deep diving in living and extinct pinnipeds: What good are big eyes?, Marine Mammal Science, 2013, 29, 1
  3. 3
    Ryan M. Bebej, Swimming Mode Inferred from Skeletal Proportions in the Fossil Pinnipeds Enaliarctos and Allodesmus (Mammalia, Carnivora), Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 2009, 16, 2, 77

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Jun J. Sato, Mieczyslaw Wolsan, Hitoshi Suzuki, Tetsuji Hosoda, Yasunori Yamaguchi, Kozue Hiyama, Mari Kobayashi, Shinji Minami, Evidence from Nuclear DNA Sequences Sheds Light on the Phylogenetic Relationships of Pinnipedia: Single Origin with Affinity to Musteloidea, Zoological Science, 2006, 23, 2, 125

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Mario A. Cozzuol, A “northern” seal from the Miocene of Argentina: implications for phocid phylogeny and biogeography, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 2001, 21, 3, 415

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Thomas A. Deméré, Annalisa Berta, A reevaluation ofProneotherium repenningifrom the Miocene Astoria Formation of Oregon and its position as a basal odobenid (Pinnipedia: Mammalia), Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 2001, 21, 2, 279

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emonds, John L. Gittleman, Colleen K. Kelly, Flippers versus feet: comparative trends in aquatic and non-aquatic carnivores, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2001, 70, 3
  8. 8
    OLAF R. P. BININDA-EMONDS, DENISE M. DECKER-FLUM, JOHN L. GITTLEMAN, The utility of chemical signals as phylogenetic characters: an example from the Felidae, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2001, 72, 1
  9. 9
    Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds, John L. Gittleman, ARE PINNIPEDS FUNCTIONALLY DIFFERENT FROM FISSIPED CARNIVORES? THE IMPORTANCE OF PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES, Evolution, 2000, 54, 3, 1011

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds, John L. Gittleman, ARE PINNIPEDS FUNCTIONALLY DIFFERENT FROM FISSIPED CARNIVORES? THE IMPORTANCE OF PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES, Evolution, 2000, 54, 3
  11. 11
    John E. Heyning, SPERM WHALE PHYLOGENY REVISITED: ANALYSIS OF THE MORPHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE, Marine Mammal Science, 1997, 13, 4
  12. 12
    Fritz Trillmich, Parental Care: Evolution, Mechanisms, and Adaptive Significance, 1996,

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Annalisa Berta, Clayton E. Ray, Skeletal morphology and locomotor capabilities of the archaic pinnipedEnaliarctos mealsi, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1990, 10, 2, 141

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Fernando César Weber Rosas, Artur Andriolo, Tatiana Lucena Pimentel, Orders Cetacea and Pinnipedia (Whales, Dolphins, Seals, Fur Seals, Sea Lions),