Braund, S. R., S. W. Stoker and J. A. Kruse. 1988. Quantification of subsistence and cultural need for howhead whales by Alaska Eskimos. Report prepared for US Department of Interior, Buteau of Indian Affairs. US submission to the International Whaling Commission, unpublished report TC/40/AS2. 118 pp. (Available from IWC).
ABUNDANCE AND POPULATION TREND (1978-2001) OF WESTERN ARCTIC BOWHEAD WHALES SURVEYED NEAR BARROW, ALASKA
Article first published online: 26 AUG 2006
Marine Mammal Science
Volume 20, Issue 4, pages 755–773, October 2004
How to Cite
George, J. C. “., Zeh, J., Suydam, R. and Clark, C. (2004), ABUNDANCE AND POPULATION TREND (1978-2001) OF WESTERN ARCTIC BOWHEAD WHALES SURVEYED NEAR BARROW, ALASKA. Marine Mammal Science, 20: 755–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01191.x
Clark, C. W., J. A. Colby, K. Cortopassi, D. Ponirakis, M. C. Fowler, C. Tessaglia-Hymes, K. M. Fristrup, K. J. Dunsmore and J. C. George. 2003. Passive acoustic locations and offshore distribution of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) during the entire Spring 2001 survey off Pt. Barrow, Alaska. Paper SC/SS/BRG4 presented to the IWC SC, May 2003. 10 pp.
Treacy, S. D. 2001. Aerial surveys of endangered whales in the Beaufort Sea, Fall 2000. US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska OCS Region.
Clapham, P. J., and L. T. Hatch. 2000. Determining spatial and temporal scales for population management units: Lessons from whaling. Paper SC/S2/SD2, available from the International Whaling Commission, The Red House, Station Road, Impington, Cambridge, UK.
- Issue published online: 26 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 26 AUG 2006
- Received: 15 October 2003 Accepted: 10 may 2004
- howhead whale;
- Balaena mysticetus;
- population abundance;
- passive acoustics;
- sea ice;
The 2001 survey of western Arctic (Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas) bowhead whales was conducted from 5 April to 7 June near Barrow, Alaska. Visual observers recorded a total of 3,295 “new” (not seen before) and 532 “conditional” (possibly seen before) whales in 1,130 h of watch effort, including 121 new calves (3.7% of the new whales). Concurrent with the visual survey, passive acoustic surveillance was conducted almost continuously from 16 April to 31 May, resulting in 27,023 locations of vocalizing bowhead whales. The estimated number of whales within 4 km of the perch (N4) was 7,025 (SE = 1,068). The estimated proportion of the whales within 4 km of the perch (P4) was 0.862 (SE = 0.044, computed by a moving blocks bootstrap). Combining these, the abundance estimate (N4/P4) for 2001 is 10,470 (SE = 1, 351) with a 95% confidence interval of 8, 100–13, 500. The estimated annual rate of increase (ROI) of the population from 1978 to 2001 is 3.4% (95% CI 1.7%-5%). Reports from hunters and results of an aerial survey in June 2001 indicate whales continued to pass Barrow after the survey had ended. In 2001 51% (572 h) of the watch was scored as occurring during “fair-excellent” visibility conditions, somewhat lower than the average for all surveys since 1978. Sea ice in the leads and fog were the principle environmental factors affecting visibility for all years. The estimated rate of increase and the fact that the number of calves counted in 2001 is the highest ever recorded suggest a steady recovery of this population. Other populations of large balaenids, notably the North Atlantic right whale, have failed to recover despite 70 yr of protection. The recovery of the howhead whale is likely attributable to low anthropogenic mortality, a relatively pristine habitat, and a well-managed subsistence hunt. Nonetheless, offshore oil development, increasing shipping traffic, changes in the Bering Sea ecosystem, sea ice retreat, and possibly killer whale predation within its range could impact this bowhead population and should be carefully monitored.