Neuroimaging of Language: Why Hasn't a Clearer Picture Emerged?
Article first published online: 21 MAY 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00143.x
© 2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Fedorenko, E. and Kanwisher, N. (2009), Neuroimaging of Language: Why Hasn't a Clearer Picture Emerged?. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3: 839–865. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00143.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 16 JUL 2009
- Article first published online: 21 MAY 2009
- Language and Linguistics Compass 3/4 (2009): 839–865, 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00143.x
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Two broad questions have driven dozens of studies on the neural basis of language published in the last several decades: (i) Are distinct cortical regions engaged in different aspects of language? (ii) Are regions engaged in language processing specific to the domain of language? Neuroimaging has not yet provided clear answers to either question. In this paper, we discuss one factor that is a likely contributor to the unclear state of affairs in the neurocognition of language, and that, in our opinion, has not received sufficient attention in the recent literature. In particular, fMRI studies of language have relied, almost exclusively, on group analyses, in which data from multiple individuals are co-registered to and analyzed in a common space. We argue that this approach can obscure functional specificity because of the anatomical variability across individual brains, and we advocate the use of an alternative approach – the functional localization approach – that circumvents this problem.

1749-818X/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=43d62a2add2aa3d9dce8a9c2e7911c3eecd67b01)
1749-818X/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=78ec926f706371bacb212d83ce0257073951b9c8)
