SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adam, S., et al. (2006). Early quantitative evidence on the pathways to work pilots, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 354, Corporate Document Services, Leeds.
  • Allen, C., Milner, J., and Price, D. (2002). Home is where the start is: the housing and urban experiences of visual impaired children. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Burke, E. (1990). A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Burns, N. (2004). Negotiating difference: disabled people's experiences of house builders. Housing Studies 19 (5), pp. 765780.
  • Butler, R. (1994). Geography and vision impaired and blind populations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 19, pp. 366368.
  • Butler, R., and Bowlby, S. (1997). Bodies and space: an exploration of disabled people's experiences of public space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15, pp. 411433.
  • Butler, R., and Parr, H. (eds) (1999). Mind and body spaces. London: Routledge.
  • Chouinard, V. (1997). Making space for disabling differences: challenging ableist geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15, pp. 379387.
  • Chouinard, V. (2000). Getting ethical: for inclusive and engaged geographies of disability. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1), pp. 7080.
  • Chouinard, V. (2006). On the dialectics of differencing: disabled women, the state and housing issues. Gender, Place and Culture 13 (4), pp. 401417.
  • Davidson, J. (2003). Phobic geographies: the phenomenology and spatiality of identity. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • Dear, M. (1978). Planning for mental health care: a reconsideration of public facility location theory. International Regional Science Review 3, pp. 93111.
  • Dear, M., Taylor, S., and Hall, G. (1980). External effects of mental health facilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70, pp. 342352.
  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2006). A new deal for welfare: empowering people to work. London: HMSO.
  • Dorn, M. (1994). Disability as spatial dissidence: a cultural geography of the stigmatised body. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
  • Dorn, M. (1998). Beyond nomadism: the travel narratives of a ‘cripple’. In: Nast, H. and Pile, S. (eds) Places through the body. London: Routledge, pp. 183206.
  • Dorn, M. (2001). Symposium on disability geography: commonalities in a world of differences. Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4), pp. 25.
  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: an analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
  • Driedger, S., Crooks, V., and Bennett, D. (2004). Engaging in the disablement process over space and time: narratives of persons with multiple sclerosis in Ottawa, Canada. Canadian Geographer 48 (2), pp. 119136.
  • Dyck, I. (1995). Hidden geographies: the changing life-worlds of women with multiple sclerosis. Social Science and Medicine 40, pp. 307320.
  • Dyck, I. (2000). Putting ethical research into practice: issues of context. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1), pp. 8087.
  • Edwards, C. (2003). Disability and the discourses of the Single Regeneration Budget. In: Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (eds) Urban renaissance? New labour, community and urban policy. London: Policy Press, pp. 163180.
  • Edwards, C. (forthcoming). Participative urban renewal? Disability, community and partnership in New Labour's urban policy. Environment and Planning A.
  • Edwards, C., and Imrie, R. (2003). Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology 37 (2), pp. 239256.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). A Perestroikan straw man answers back: David Laitin and phronetic social science. In: Schram, S. and Caterino, B. (eds) Making political science matter. New York: New York University Press, pp. 5685.
  • Fuller, D., and Kitchin, R. (2004). Radical theory/critical praxis: academic geography beyond the academy? In: Fuller, D. and Kitchin, R. (eds) Radical Geography/Critical Praxis: making a difference beyond the academy. Vernon and Victoria, Canada: Praxis Press, pp. 120. [online]. Retrieved on 21 March 2007 from http://www.praxis-epress.org/rtcp/contents.html
  • Fuller, M., Bradley, A., and Healey, M. (2004). Incorporating disabled students within an inclusive higher education environment. Disability and Society 19, pp. 45568.
  • Gaete-Reyes, M. (2006). The mobility and movement of women wheelchair users, PhD upgrading report, Department of Geography, King's College London, Strand, London.
  • Gilchrist, R. (2007). Inclusive, accessible and archaeology. [online]. Retrieved on 22 February 2007 from http://www.hca.heacademy.ac.uk/access-archaeology/inclusive_accessible/
  • Gleeson, B. (1996). A geography for disabled people? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21, pp. 387396.
  • Gleeson, B. (1998). Justice and the disabling city. In: Fincher, R. and Jacobs, J. (eds) Cities of difference. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 89119.
  • Gleeson, B. (1999). Geographies of disability. London: Routledge.
  • Gleeson, B. (2000). Enabling geography: exploring a new political-ethical ideal. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1), pp. 6569.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Golledge, R. G. (1991). Tactual strip maps as navigational aids. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 85, pp. 296301.
  • Golledge, R. G. (1993). Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 18, pp. 6385.
  • Golledge, R. G., et al. (1991). Designing a personal guidance system to aid navigation without sight: progress on the GIS component. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5, pp. 373395.
  • Golledge, R. G., and Timmermans, H. (1990). Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems. Progress in Human Geography 14, pp. 5799.
  • Gouldner, A. (1971). The coming crisis in Western sociology. London: Heinemann.
  • Hall, E. (2004). Social geographies of learning disability: narratives of exclusion and inclusion. Area 36 (3), pp. 298306.
  • Hall, E., and Kearns, R. (2001). Making space for the ‘intellectual’ in geographies of disability. Health and Place 7, pp. 237246.
  • Hall, T., Healey, M., and Harrison, M. (2002). Disabled students and fieldwork: from exclusion to inclusion. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27, pp. 213231.
  • Hastings, J., and Thomas, H. (2006). Accessing the nation: disability, political inclusion and built form. Urban Studies 42 (3), pp. 527544.
  • Hawkesworth, M. (2001). Disabling spatialities and the regulation of a visible secret. Urban Studies 38 (2), pp. 299318.
  • Hawkesworth, M. (2002). The spatialities of facial disfigurement: the case of acne, Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Healey, M. (2003). Towards the inclusion of disabled students on fieldwork. Skill Journal 75, pp. 1116.
  • Hetherington, K. (2003). Spatial textures: making place through touch. Environment and Planning A 35 (11), pp. 19331944.
  • Holt, L. (2004). Children with mind-body differences and performing (dis)ability in classroom micro-spaces. Children's Geographies 2 (2), pp. 219236.
  • Humphrey, J. (2000). Researching disability projects, or some problems with the social model in practice. Disability and Society 15 (1), pp. 6386.
  • Imrie, R. (1996). Disability and the city. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Imrie, R. (2003). Architects’ conceptions of the human body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21 (1), pp. 4765.
  • Imrie, R. (2004). Disability, embodiment, and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies 19 (5), pp. 745763.
  • Imrie, R. (2006). Accessible housing: quality, disability, and design. London: Routledge.
  • Imrie, R., and Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive design. London: Spon Press.
  • Kitchin, R. (2000). The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. Disability and Society 15 (1), pp. 2548.
  • Kitchin, R. (2001). Using participatory action research approaches in geographical studies of disability: some reflections. Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4), pp. 6169.
  • Komardjaja, I. (2001). New cultural geographies of disability: Asian values and the accessibility ideal. Social and Cultural Geography 2 (1), pp. 7786.
  • Laurier, E., and Parr, H. (2000). Emotions and interviewing in health and disability research. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1), pp. 98102.
  • Laws, G. (1994). Oppression, knowledge and the built environment. Political Geography 13, pp. 732.
  • Le Corbusier. (1994). Towards a new architecture. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Architecture.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • MacKain, S., Perkins, C., and Dodge, M. (2006). Touching places/placing touch: space, culture and tactility, Call for Papers, AAG 2007, San Francisco.
  • Moss, P., and Dyck, I. (1996). Inquiry into environment and body: women, work, and chronic illness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14, pp. 737753.
  • Moss, P., and Dyck, I. (1999). Journeying through ME: identity, body and women with chronic illness. In: Teather, L. (ed.) Embodied geographies: spaces, bodies and rites of passage. London: Routledge, pp. 157174.
  • Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap and Society 7, pp. 101114.
  • Pain, R. (2006). Social geography: seven deadly myths in policy research. Progress in Human Geography 30 (2), pp. 250259.
  • Park, D., and Radford, J. (1997). Space, place, and the asylum: an introduction. Health and Place 3, pp. 7172.
  • Park, D., Radford, J., and Vickers, M. (1998). Disability studies in human geography. Progress in Human Geography 22 (3), pp. 208233.
  • Park, D., Simpson-Housley, P., and de Man, A. (1994). To the ‘infinite spaces of creation’: the interior landscape of a schizophrenic artist. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, pp. 192209.
  • Parr, H. (1997). Mental health, public space, and the city: questions of individual and collective access. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15, pp. 435454.
  • Parr, H. (2006). Mental health, the arts and belonging. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (2), pp. 150166.
  • Parr, H., Philo, C., and Burns, N. (2005). ‘Not a display of emotions’: emotional geographies of the Scottish Highlands. In: Davidson, J., Bondi, L. and Smith, M. (eds) Emotional geographies. London: Ashgate, pp. 87102.
  • Parr, H., Philo, C., and Burns, N. (2004). The house across the water: contested memories of Craig Dunain Asylum. Scottish Geographical Journal 119, pp. 341360.
  • Pfeiffer, D. (ed.) (2001). Disability geography: commonalities in a world of differences. Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4), pp. 25.
  • Philo, C. (1989). ‘Enough to drive one mad’: the organisation of space in 19th century lunatic asylums. In: Wolch, J. and Dear, M. (eds) The power of geography: how territory shapes social life. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, pp. 258290.
  • Philo, C. (Journey to asylum: a medical-geographical idea in historical context. Journal of Historical Geography 21, pp. 148168.
  • Philo, C., Parr, H., and Burns, N. (2005). ‘An oasis for us’: ‘in-between’ spaces of training for people with mental health problems in the Scottish Highlands. Geoforum 36, pp. 778791.
  • Pinch, S. (1993). Social Polarisation: a comparison of evidence from Britain and the United States. Environment and Planning A 25, pp. 779795.
  • Roberts, J. (2006). A sense of the world: how a blind man became history's greatest traveller. London: Simon & Schuster,
  • Sainsbury, R., and Davidson, J. (2006). Routes on to incapacity benefit: findings from qualitative research, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 350, Corporate Document Services, Leeds.
  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Looking back, moving forward. [online]. Retrieved on 3 January 2007 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/columnists/tom/250906_index.shtml
  • Sheller, M., and Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38 (2), pp. 207226.
  • Sibley, D. (1995). Geographies of exclusion. London: Routledge.
  • Siebers, T. (2003). What can disability studies learn from the culture wars? Cultural Critique 55, pp. 183216.
  • Skelton, T., and Valentine, G. (2003). ‘It feels like being Deaf is normal’: an exploration into the complexities of defining D/deafness and young D/deaf people's identities. Canadian Geographer 47 (4), pp. 451466.
  • Thomas, H., and Imrie, R. (2006). The environment and disability: making the connections, Call for Papers, Special Issue of Local Environment, paper available from Huw Thomas, e-mail: thomash1@cardiff.ac.uk.
  • Thomas, P. (2004). The experience of disabled people as customers in the owner occupied market. Housing Studies 19 (5), pp. 781794.
  • Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. London: UPIAS.
  • Valentine, G. (2003). Geography and ethics: in pursuit of social justice – ethics and emotions in geographies of health and disability. Progress in Human Geography 27 (3), pp. 375380
  • Valentine, G. (2004a). From flexibility to accommodation: disabled workers and the reinvention of paid work. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29, pp. 420432.
  • Wilton, R. (2004b). Keeping your distance: balancing political engagement and scientific autonomy with a psychiatric consumer/survivor group. In: Fuller, D. and Kitchin, R. (eds) Radical geography/critical Praxis: making a difference beyond the academy. London: ACME Press, pp. 116131. [online]. Retrieved on day month year from http://www.praxis-epress.org/rtcp/contents.html
  • Wilton, R., and Schuer, S. (2006). Towards socio-spatial inclusion: disabled people, neoliberalism and the contemporary labour market. Area 38 (2), pp. 186195.
  • Wolch, J., and Philo, C. (2000). From distributions of deviance to definitions of difference: past and future mental health geographies. Health and Place 6, pp. 137157.
  • Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. New York: Princeton University Press.