SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ali, K., Partridge, M. D., and Olfert, M. R. (2007). Can geographically weighted regression improve regional analysis and policy making? International Regional Science Review 30, pp. 300329.
  • Amin, A., and Thrift, N. (2000). What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography? Antipode 32, pp. 49.
  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicaors of spatial associationn – LISA. Geographical Analysis 27, pp. 93115.
  • Anselin, L., Varga, A., and Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42, pp. 422448.
  • Barnes, T. (2001). Retheorizing economic geography: from the quantitative revolution to the ‘cultural turn’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91, pp. 546565.
  • Barnes, T. (2003). The place of locational analysis: a selective and interpretive history. Progress in Human Geography 27, pp. 6995.
  • Barnes, T., and Hannah, M. (2001). The place of numbers: histories, geographies, and theories of quantification. Environment and Planning D 19, pp. 379383.
  • Congdon, P. (2003). Applied bayesian modelling. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Crang, M. (2002). Qualitative methods: the new orthodoxy? Progress in Human Geography 26, pp. 647655.
  • Dall’erba, S. (2005). Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: an exploratory spatial data analysis. Annals of Regional Science 39, pp. 128.
  • Dall’erba, S., and Le Gallo, J. (2008). Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: a spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science 87: 219245.
  • Duranton, G., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2005). When economists and geographers collide, or the tale of the lions and the butterflies. Environment and Planning A 37: 16951705.
  • Ertur, C., and Koch, W. (2006). Regional disparities in the European Union and the enlargement process: an exploratory spatial data analysis, 1995–2000. Annals of Regional Science 40, pp. 723765.
  • Ertur, C., Le Gallo, J., and Baumont, C. (2006). The European regional convergence process, 1980–1995: do spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity matter? International Regional Science Review 29, pp. 234.
  • Essletzbichler, J. (2003). From mass Production to flexible specialization: the sectoral and geographical extent of contract work in US manufacturing. Regional Studies 37, pp. 753771.
  • Essletzbichler, J. (2009 forthcoming). Locating location theory. In: Lee, R., et al. (eds) The sage compendium of economic geography. London and New York: Sage.
  • Essletzbichler, J., and Rigby, D. (2005a). Technological evolution as creative destruction of process heterogeneity. Evidence from US plant level data. Economic Systems Research 17, pp. 2545.
  • Essletzbichler, J., and Rigby, D. (2005b). Competition, variety and the geography of technology evolution. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95, pp. 4862.
  • Ezcurra, R. (2007). Is income inequality harmful for regional growth? Evidence from the European Union. Urban Studies 44: 19531971.
  • Fingeleton, B. (2000). Spatial econometrics, economic geography, and spatial econometrics: a third way? Environment and Planning A 32, pp. 14811498.
  • Fingleton, B., and López-Bazo, E. (2006). Empirical growth models with spatial effects. Papers in Regional Science 85, pp. 177198.
  • Flowerdew, R. (1998). Reacting to ground truth. Environment and Planning A 30, pp. 289301.
  • Floyd, B. (1963). Quantification: a geographic deviation? Professional Geographer 15, pp. 1517.
  • Foster, J. (1997). The analytical foundations of evolutionary economics: from biological analogy to economic self-organization. Structural change and economic dynamics 8, pp. 427451.
  • Fotheringham, A. S. (1997). Trends in quantitative methods I: stressing the local. Progress in Human Geography 21, pp. 8896.
  • Fotheringham, A. S. (1998). Trends in quantitative methods II: stressing the computational. Progress in Human Geography 22, pp. 283292.
  • Fotheringham, A. S. (1999). Trends in quantitative methods III: stressing the visual. Progress in Human Geography 23, pp. 617626.
  • Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., and Charlton, M. (2000). Quantitative geography. perspectives on spatial data analysis. London: Sage.
  • Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M. E., and Brunsdon, C. (1998). Geographically weighted regression: a natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A 30, pp. 19051927.
  • Fowler, C. S. (2007). Taking geographical economics out of equilibrium: implications for theory and policy. Journal of Economic Geography 7, pp. 265284.
  • Getis, A., and Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 24, pp. 189206.
  • Hamnett, C. (2003). Contemporary human geography: fiddling while Rome burns. Geoforum 34, pp. 13.
  • Jackson, P. (2002). Commercial cultures: transcending the cultural and the economic. Progress in Human Geography 26, pp. 318.
  • James, A. (2006). Critical moments in the production of ‘rigorous’ and ‘relevant’ cultural economic geographies. Progress in Human Geography 30, pp. 289308.
  • James, A., et al. (2004). (Expanding) the role of geography in public policy. Environment and Planning A 36, pp. 19011905.
  • Johnston, R., et al. (2003). Contemporary fiddling in human geography while Rome burns: has quantitative analysis been largely abandoned – and should it be? Geoforum 34, pp. 157161.
  • Keen, S. (2001). Debunking economics. Annandale, VA: Pluto Press.
  • Keylock, C. J., and Dorling, D. (2004). What kind of quantitative methods for what kind of geography? Area 36, pp. 358366.
  • Lawson, V. (1995). The politics of difference: examining the quantitative/qualitative dualism in post-structuralist feminst theory. Professional Geographer 47, pp. 449457.
  • Le Gallo, J., and Dall’erba, S. (2006). Evaluating the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the European convergence process. Journal of Regional Science 46, pp. 269288.
  • Le Gallo, J., and Ertur, C. (2003). Exploratory spatial data analysis of the distribution of regional per capita GDP in Europe. Papers in Regional Science 82, pp. 175201.
  • Mäki, U. (2004). Realism and the nature of theory: a lesson from J H von Thünen for economists and geographers. Environment and Planning A 36: 17191736.
  • Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33, pp. 869884.
  • Martin, R. (1999). The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23, pp. 6591.
  • Martin, R. (2001). Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25, pp. 189210.
  • Martin, R. (2008). The ‘new economic geography’: credible models of the economic landscape? In: Lee, R., et al. (eds) The sage compendium of economic geography. London and New York: Sage, Forthcoming.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2001). Rethinking the ‘economic’ in economic geography: broadening our vision or losing our focus? Antipode 33, pp. 148161.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2007). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 7, pp. 573601.
  • McClafferty, S. (1995). Counting for women. Professional Geographer 47, pp. 436441.
  • McMillen, D. P. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation or model misspecification? International Regional Science Review 26, pp. 208217.
  • Neary, J. P. (2001). Of hype and hyperbolas: introducing the new economic geography. Journal of Economic Literature 39, pp. 535561.
  • O'Sullivan, D. (2004). Complexity science and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS29, pp. 282295.
  • Openshaw, S. (1998). Towards a more computationally minded scientific human geography. Environment and Planning A 30, pp. 317332.
  • Ord, J. K., and Getis, A. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27, pp. 286306.
  • Parent, O., and Lesage, J. (2008). Using the variance structure of the conditional autoregressive spatial specification to model knowledge spillovers. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23, pp. 235256.
  • Partridge, M. D., and Rickman, D. S. (2007). Persistent pockets of extreme American poverty and job growth: is there a place-based policy role? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 32, pp. 201224.
  • Partridge, M. D., et al. (2008). The geographic diversity of U.S. nonmetropolitan growth dynamics: a geographically weighted regression approach. Land Economics 84, pp. 241266.
  • Pavlovskaya, M. (2006). Theorizing with GIS: a tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A 38, pp. 20032020.
  • Peck, J. (2003). Fuzzy old world: a response to Markusen. Regional Studies 37, pp. 729740.
  • Philip, L. J. (1998). Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to social research in human geography – an impossible mixture? Environment and Planning A 30, pp. 261276.
  • Plummer, P. (1999). Capital accumulation, economic restructuring, and non-equilibrium regional growth dynamics. Geographical Analysis 31, pp. 267287.
  • Plummer, P. (2007). Economic geography, by the numbers? In: Tickell, A., et al. (eds) Politics and practice in economic geography. London: Sage, pp. 199209.
  • Plummer, P., and Sheppard, E. (2001). Must emancipatory economic geography be qualitative? Antipode 30, pp. 758763.
  • Plummer, P., and Sheppard, E. (2006). Geography matters: agency, structures and dynamics at the intersection of economics and geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6, pp. 619637.
  • Plummer, P., and Sheppard, E. (2007). A methodology for evaluating regional political economy. In: Fingleton, B. (ed) New directions in economic geography. London: Edward Elgar, pp. 250276.
  • Plummer, P., and Taylor, P. (2001a). Theories of local economic growth (part 1): concepts, models, and measurement. Environment and Planning A 33, pp. 219236.
  • Plummer, P., and Taylor, P. (2001b). Theories of local economic growth (part 2): model specification and empirical validation. Environment and Planning A 33, pp. 385398.
  • Poon, J. P. H. (2003). Quantitative methods: producing quantitative methods narratives. Progress in Human Geography 27, pp. 753762.
  • Poon, J. P. H. (2004). Quantitative methods: past and present. Progress in Human Geography 28, pp. 807814.
  • Poon, J. P. H. (2005). Quantitative methods: not positively positivist. Progress in Human Geography 29, pp. 766772.
  • Poon, J. P. H. (2007). Instrumentation rigor and practice. Environment and Planning A 39, pp. 10171019.
  • Rey, S., and Janikas, M. (2005). Regional convergence, inequality, and space. Journal of Economic Geography 5, pp. 155176.
  • Rey, S., and Montouri, B. (1999). U.S. regional income convergence: a spatial econometric approach. Regional Studies 33, pp. 143156.
  • Rigby, D., and Essletzbichler, J. (1997). Evolution, process variety, and regional trajectories of technological change in US manufacturing. Economic Geography 73, pp. 269284.
  • Rigby, D., and Essletzbichler, J. (2006). Technological variety, technological change and a geography of production techniques. Journal of Economic Geography 6, pp. 7189.
  • Rigby, D. (2007). Evolution in economic geography? In: Tickell, A., et al. (eds.) Politics and practice in economic geography. London: Sage, pp. 176177.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2001). Killing economic geography with a ‘cultural turn’ overdose. Antipode 33 (2), pp. 176182.
  • Sayer, A., and Morgan, K. (1985). A modern industry in a declining region: links between methohd, theory and policy. In: Massey, D., and Meagan, R. (eds). Politics and method. London, UK: Methuen, pp. 147168.
  • Sheppard, E. (2001). Quantitative geography: representations, practices and possibilities. Environment and Planning D 19, pp. 535554.
  • Sheppard, E., and Barnes, T. (1990). The capitalist space economy: geographical analysis after Ricardo, Marx and Sraffa. London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Sheppard, E., and Plummer, P. (2007). Toward engaged pluralism in geographical debate. Environment and Planning A 39, pp. 25452548.
  • Sheppard, E., Plummer, P., and Haining, R. (1998). Profit rate maximization in interdependent markets. Journal of Regional Science 32, pp. 5575.
  • Sibley, D. (1998). Sensations and spatial science: gratification and anxiety in the production of ordered landscapes. Environment and Planning A 30, pp. 235246.
  • Spate, O. H. K. (1960). Quantity and quality in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 50, pp. 377394.
  • Tickell, A., et al. (2007). Politics and practice in economic geography. London: Sage.
  • Valentine, G. (2006). Relevance and rigour: the advnatages of reusing and scaling up qualitative data. Environment and Planning A 38, pp. 413415.
  • Webber, M., and Rigby, D. L. (1999). Accumulation and the rate of profit: regulating the macroeconomy. Environment and Planning A 31, pp. 141164.
  • Withers, S. D. (2002). Quantitative methods: Bayesian inference, Bayesian thinking. Progress in Human Geography 26, pp. 553566.
  • Witt, U. (2003). The evolving economy: essays on the evolutionary approach in economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Yeung, H. W. C. (2003). Practicing new economic geographies: a methodological examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93, pp. 442462.