SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977). Journal of Historical Geography 1, pp. 5889.
  • Agamben, G. (1995). Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1), pp. 5380.
  • Agnew, J. (2005). Sovereignty regimes: territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2), pp. 437461.
  • Agnew, J., and Corbridge, S. (1995). Mastering space: hegemony, territory and international political economy. London: Routledge.
  • Anand, D. (2003). A contemporary story of ‘Diaspora’: the Tibetan Version. Diaspora 12 (2), pp. 211229.
  • Anderson, J. (1996). The shifting stage of politics: new medieval and postmodern territorialities? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14 (2), pp. 133153.
  • Anghie, A. (2002). Colonialism and the birth of international institutions: sovereignty, economy, and the mandate system of the League of Nations. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 34 (3), pp. 513633.
  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Public Culture 2 (2), pp. 124.
  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalisation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the sovereign state: a double reading of the anarchy problematique. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17 (2), pp. 227262.
  • Bahcheli, T., Bartmann, B., and Srebrnik, H. (eds) (2004). De facto states: the quest for sovereignty. London: Routledge.
  • Barkin, J. S., and Cronin, B. (1994). The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations. International Organization 48 (1), pp. 107130.
  • Bartelson, J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bartmann, B. (2004). Political realities and legal anomalies: revisiting the politics of international recognition. In: Bahcheli, T., Bartmann, B., and Srebrnik, H. (eds) De facto states: the quest for sovereignty. London: Routledge, pp. 1231.
  • Biersteker, T., and Weber, C. (1996). The social construction of state sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bruyneel, K. (2007). The third space of sovereignty: the postcolonial politics of U.S.-indigenous relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Camilleri, J., and Falk, J. (1992). The end of sovereignty? The politics of a shrinking and fragmenting world. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Cassidy, J. (1998). Sovereignty of aboriginal peoples. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 9, pp. 65119.
  • Castells, M. (2000). End of millennium, the information age: economy, society and culture, Vol. III, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Clapham, C. (1995). The international relations of Africa’s Guerrilla movements. South African Journal of International Affairs 3 (1), pp. 8191.
  • Clapham, C. (1998). Degrees of statehood. Review of International Studies 24 (2), pp. 143157.
  • Constantinou, C. M. (1998). Before the summit: representations of sovereignty on the Himalayas. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27 (1), pp. 2353.
  • Conway, M., and Gotovitch, J. (2001). Europe in exile: European Exile Communities in Britain 1940–1945. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivistava, N., and Veron, R. (2005). Seeing the state: governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dahlman, C., and Ó Tuathail, G. (2006). Bosnia’s third space? Nationalist separatsim and international supervision in Bosnia’s Brčko District. Geopolitics 11 (4), pp. 651675.
  • Dalby, S. (1991). Critical geopolitics: discourse, difference and dissent. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9 (3), pp. 261283.
  • Dalby, S. (2007). Regions, strategies and empire in the global war on terror. Geopolitics 12 (4), pp. 586606.
  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
  • Desbiens, C., Mountz, A., and Walton-Roberts, M. (2004). Guest editorial. Introduction: reconceptualising the state from the margins of political geography. Political Geography 23 (3), pp. 241243.
  • Dodds, K. (1997). Geopolitics in Antarctica: views from the southern oceanic rim. Chichester: John Wiley.
  • Dodds, K. (2008). Counter-factual geopolitics: President Al Gore, September 11th and the Global War on Terror. Geopolitics 13 (1), pp. 7399.
  • Dowler, L., and Sharp, J. (2001). A feminist geopolitics? Space and Polity 5 (3), pp. 165176.
  • Dreyer, J. T., and Sautman, B. (eds) (2005). Contemporary Tibet: politics, development and society in a disputed region. London: ME Sharp.
  • Duursma, J. (1996). Fragmentation and the international relations of micro-states: self-determination and statehood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edkins, J., and Pin-Fat, V. (1999). The subject of the political. In: Edkins, J., Persram, N., and Pin-Fat, V. (eds) Sovereignty and subjectivity. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 118.
  • Elden, S. (2006). Contingent sovereignty, territorial integrity and the sanctity of borders. SAIS Review 26 (1), pp. 1124.
  • Ellis, S., and Sechaba, T. (1992). Comrades against apartheid: the ANC and the South African Communist Party in exile. Blommington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Forsberg, T. (1996). Beyond sovereignty, within territoriality: mapping the space of late-modern (geo)politics. Cooperation and Conflict 31 (4), pp. 355386.
  • Foucault, M. (1979). On governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness 6, pp. 522.
  • Glassner, M. (1993). Political geography. London: Wiley.
  • Goddeeris, I. (2007). The temptation of legitimacy: exile politics from a comparative perspective. Contemporary European History 16 (3), pp. 395405.
  • Goldstein, M. C. (1978). Ethnogenesis and resource competition among Tibetan refugees in South India: a new face to the Indo-Tibetan interface. In: Fisher, J. F. (ed.) Himalayan anthropology: the Indo-Tibetan interface. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 395420.
  • Gottlieb, G. (1993). Nation against state: a new approach to ethnic conflicts and the decline of sovereignty. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
  • Gregory, D. (2004). The colonial present. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Gregory, D., and Pred, A. (eds) (2007). Violent geographies: fear, terror and political violence. New York: Routledge.
  • Griffiths, M., and O’Callaghan, T. (2002). International relations: the key concepts. London: Routledge.
  • Grundy-Warr, C., and Wong, E. S. Y. (2002). Geographies of displacement: the Karenni and the Shan across the Myanmar-Thailand Border. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 23 (1), pp. 93122.
  • Guibernau, M. (1999). Nations without states: political communities in a global age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Guy, R. (2004). Western Sahara: the wall of shame. Green Left Weekly, 9 June 2004. [Online]. Retrieved on 23 August 2006 from: http://www.greenleft.org.au/2004/585/32352
  • Hansen, T. B., and Stepputat, F. (2005). Sovereign bodies: citizens, migrants and states in the postcolonial world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Harris, C. (1997). Struggling with Shangri-la: a Tibetan artist in exile. In: Korom, F. (ed.) Constructing Tibetan culture: contemporary perspectives. Quebec: World Heritage Press, pp. 160177.
  • Herod, A., Ó Tuathail, G., and Roberts, S. (1998). Unruly world? Globalization, governance and geography. London: Routledge.
  • Houston, S., and Wright, R. (2003). Making and remaking Tibetan diasporic identities. Social and Cultural Geography 4 (2), pp. 217231.
  • Hudson, A. (1998). Beyond the borders: globalisation, sovereignty and extra-territoriality. Geopolitics 3 (1), pp. 89105.
  • Hyman, A. (1987). The Afghan politics of exile. Third World Quarterly 9 (1), pp. 6784.
  • Hyndman, J. (2004). Mind the gap: bridging feminist and political geography through geopolitics. Political Geography 23 (3), pp. 307322.
  • International Campaign for Tibet (2006). Tibetan scholar sentenced to ten years in prison after writing book on history and culture. ICT Media Center, 8 August 2006. [Online]. Retrieved on 27 April 2009 from: http://www.savetibet.org/media-center/ict-news-reports/tibetan-scholar-sentenced-ten-years-prison-after-writing-book-history-and-culture.
  • International Commission of Jurists (1960). Tibet and the Chinese People’s Republic. Geneva: ICJ.
  • Iwanska, A. (1981). Exiled governments: Spanish and Polish. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
  • Jackson, R. (1990). Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackson, P., Crang, P., and Dwyer, C. (eds) (2004). Transnational spaces. London: Routledge.
  • Jeffrey, A. (2006). Building state capacity in post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina: the case of Brčko District. Political Geography 25 (2), pp. 203227.
  • Jones, R. (2009). Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography 33 (2), pp. 174189.
  • Kaplan, S. (2008). The remarkable story of Somaliland. Journal of Democracy 19 (3), pp. 143157.
  • Kearns, G. (2008). Progressive geopolitics. Geography Compass 2 (5), pp. 15991620.
  • Keating, M. (2001a). Nations against the state: the new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Keating, M. (2001b). Plurinational democracy: stateless nations in a post-sovereignty era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Klieger, P. C. (1992). Tibetan nationalism: the role of patronage in the accomplishment of a national identity. Berkeley, CA: Folklore Institute.
  • Kofman, E. (2008). Feminist transformations of political geography. In: Cox, K. R., Low, M., and Robinson, J. (eds) The sage handbook of political geography. London: Sage, pp. 7386.
  • Kolossov, V. A., and O’Loughlin, J. (2008). Pseudo-states as harbingers of a new geopolitics: the example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR). Geopolitics 3 (1), pp. 151176.
  • Korom, F. (1997). Constructing Tibetan culture: contemporary perspectives. Quebec: World Heritage Press.
  • Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: organised hypocrisy. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
  • Krasner, S. D. (ed.) (2001). Problematic sovereignty: contested rules and political possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lavie, S., and Swedenburg, T. (1996). Displacement, diaspora, and geographies of identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Lijphart, A. (2004). Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy 15 (2), pp. 96109.
  • Low, M. (2003). Political geography in question. Political Geography 22 (6), pp. 624631.
  • Mandaville, P. G. (1999). Territory and translocality: discrepant idioms of political identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28 (3), pp. 653673.
  • McConnell, F. (2009). Democracy-in-exile: the ‘uniqueness’ and limitations of exile Tibetan democracy. Sociological Bulletin 58 (1), pp. 115144.
  • McConnell, F. (forthcoming). De facto, displaced, tacit: the sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Political Geography. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001.
  • McCorquodale, R., and Orosz, N. (eds) (1994). Tibet: the Position in International Law, Report of the Conference of International Lawyers on Issues Relating to Self-Determination and Independence for Tibet, London 6–10 January 1993. Stuttgart: Hansjörg Mayer.
  • McDowell, L. (1992). Doing gender: feminisms, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17 (4), pp. 399416.
  • Megoran, N. (2006). For ethnography in political geography: experiencing and re-imagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures. Political Geography 25 (6), pp. 622640.
  • Megoran, N. (2008). The task and responsibility of geopolitical analysis. Geopolitics 13 (3), pp. 403407.
  • Mihalkanin, E. (2004). The Abkhazians: a national minority in their own homeland. In: Bahcheli, T., Bartmann, B., and Srebrnik, H. (eds) De facto states: the quest for sovereignty. London: Routledge, pp. 143163.
  • Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review 85 (1), pp. 7796.
  • Moncrieffe, J., and Eyben, R. (2007). The power of labelling: how people are categorised and why it matters. London: Earthscan.
  • Moore, M. (ed.) (1998). National self-determination and secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moshe, S. (1996). The Palestinian entity, 1959–1974: Arab politics and the PLO. London: Cass.
  • Mountz, A. (2003). Human smuggling, the transnational imaginary and everyday geographies of the nation-state. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 35 (3), pp. 622644.
  • Murphy, A. B. (1996). The sovereign state system as political-territorial ideal: historical and contemporary considerations. In: Biersteker, T. J., and Weber, C. (eds) State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81120.
  • Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2003). ‘Life is dead here’: sensing the political in ‘no man’s land’. Anthropological Theory 3 (1), pp. 107125.
  • Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2005). Confinement and imagination: sovereignty and subjectivity in a quasi-state. In: Hansen, T. B., and Stepputat, F. (eds) Sovereign bodies: citizens, migrants and states in the postcolonial world. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 103119.
  • Norbu, D. (1999). Tibet: the road ahead. London: Random House.
  • Norbu, D. (2001). Refugees from Tibet: structural causes of successful settlements. The Tibet Journal 26 (2), pp. 325.
  • Ó Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: the politics of writing global space. London: Routledge.
  • Ó Tuathail, G., and Luke, T. (1994). Present at the (dis)integration: deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation in the new wor(l)d order. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84 (3), pp. 381398.
  • O’Brien, R. (1992). Global financial integration: the end of geography. London: Chatham House Papers.
  • Ohmae, K. (1996). End of the nation state: the rise of regional economies. London: Harper Collins.
  • Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: the cultural logic of transnationality. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
  • Ostergaard-Nielsen, E. K. (2001). Transnational political practices and the receiving state: Turks and Kurds in Germany and the Netherlands. Global Networks 1 (3), pp. 261281.
    Direct Link:
  • Painter, J. (2006). Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography 25 (7), pp. 752774.
  • Palmier, J.-M. (2006). Weimar in exile: the antifascist emigration in Europe and America. London: Verso.
  • Pegg, S. M. (1998). International society and the de facto state. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Reisman, M. (1991). Governments-in-exile: notes towards a theory of formation and operation. In: Shain, Y. (ed.) Governments-in-exile in contemporary world politics. London: Routledge, pp. 238248.
  • Robinson, J. (2003). Postcolonialising geography: tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24 (3), pp. 273289.
  • Rosenberg, J. (1990). A non-realist theory of sovereignty? Giddens’‘The Nation State and Violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19 (2), pp. 249259.
  • Secor, A. J. (2001). Towards a feminist counter-geopolitics: gender, space and Islamist politics in Istanbul. Space and Polity 5 (3), pp. 199219.
  • Shain, Y. (1989). The frontier of loyalty: political exiles in the age of the nation-state. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Shain, Y. (1991). Governments-in-exile in contemporary world politics. London: Routledge.
  • Shakya, T. (1999). The dragon in the land of snows: a history of modern Tibet since 1947. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Shapiro, M. J. (1996). Introduction. In: Shapiro, M. J., and Alker, H. R. (eds) Challenging boundaries: global flows, territorial identities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ixxii.
  • Shelley, T. (2004). Endgame in the Western Sahara: what future for Africa’s last colony? London: Zed Books.
  • Sidaway, J. D. (2002). Imagined regional communities: integration and sovereignty in the global south. London: Routledge.
  • Sidaway, J. D. (2003). Sovereign excesses? Portraying postcolonial sovereigntyscapes. Political Geography 22 (2), pp. 157178.
  • Soguk, N., and Whitehall, G. (1999). Wandering grounds: transversality, identity, territoriality and movement. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28 (3), pp. 675698.
  • Sparke, M. (2004). Political geography: political geographies of globalisation (1) – dominance. Progress in Human Geography 28 (6), pp. 777794.
  • Srebrnik, H. (2004). Can clans form nations? Somaliland in the making. In: Bahcheli, T., Bartmann, B., and Srebrnik, H. (eds) De facto states: the quest for sovereignty. London: Routledge, pp. 210231.
  • Steinberg, P. E. (2001). The social construction of the ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Strauss, M. J. (2007). Guantanamo Bay and the evolution of international leases and servitudes. The New York City Law Review 10 (2), pp. 479510.
  • Subba, T. B. (1990). Flight and adaptation: Tibetan refugees in the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.
  • Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 6 (3), pp. 374385.
  • Talmon, S. (1998). Recognition of governments in international law: with particular reference to governments-in-exile. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • The Economist (2001, 22 December 2001). Home thoughts from abroad. The Economist, pp. 4546.
  • Thrift, N. (2000). It’s the little things. In: Dodds, K., and Atkins, D. (eds) Geopolitical traditions: a century of geopolitical thought. London: Routledge, pp. 380387.
  • Van Schendel, W. (2002). Stateless in South Asia: the making of the India-Bangladesh enclaves. Journal of Asian Studies 61 (1), pp. 115147.
  • Van Walt van Praag, M. (1987). Status of Tibet: history, rights and prospects in international law. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
  • Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (2), pp. 447462.
  • Vinokurov, E. (2007). A theory of enclaves. Lantham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Walker, R. J. B. (1993). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walker, S. (2007). Young rebels – Abkhazia. Monocle: A Briefing on Global Affairs, Business, Culture and Design 1 (6), pp. 3141.
  • Weber, C. (1995). Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, C. (1998). Performative states. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27 (1), pp. 7895.
  • Wei, J. (ed.) (1989). 100 questions about Tibet. Beijing: Beijing Review Publications.
  • Weller, M., and Wolff, S. (eds) (2005). Autonomy, self-governance and conflict resolution: innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Yeh, E. T. (2007). Exile meets homeland: politics, performance and authenticity in the Tibetan diaspora. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25, pp. 648667.