Making a Positive Impression in a Negotiation: Gender Differences in Response to Impression Motivation
Article first published online: 8 APR 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00010.x
© 2008 International Association for Conflict Management and Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Curhan, J. R. and Overbeck, J. R. (2008), Making a Positive Impression in a Negotiation: Gender Differences in Response to Impression Motivation. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1: 179–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00010.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 APR 2008
- Article first published online: 8 APR 2008
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- gender;
- negotiation;
- stereotype threat;
- stereotype reactance;
- impression management;
- impression motivation
Abstract
Prior research has demonstrated the phenomenon of stereotype reactance, whereby men and women behave in contrast to gender stereotypes, when those stereotypes are activated explicitly (Kray, Thompson, & Galinsky, 2001). The authors propose and present an experiment demonstrating a new mechanism for stereotype reactance—namely, impression motivation, or the degree to which people are motivated to control how others see them (Leary & Kowalski, 1990). Participants randomly assigned to represent either a high-status recruiter or a low-status job candidate engaged in a standard employment negotiation simulation. Half the participants were offered an additional incentive to make a positive impression on their negotiation counterparts. As hypothesized, men and women in the high-status role responded to impression motivation in a manner that contradicted gender stereotypes. Men responded to impression motivation by yielding value to their subordinates, whereas women responded by claiming value for themselves.

1750-4716/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=ecd9c4bc6fb8169e1fec863b58785d47f81ec5de)
