Get access

Feline leukaemia virus status of Australian cats with lymphosarcoma

Authors

  • LJ GABOR,

    1. The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2006
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathology

    • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences

  • ML JACKSON,

    1. The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2006
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Department of Veterinary Pathology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0W0

  • B. TRASK,

    1. The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2006
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Department of Veterinary Pathology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0W0

  • R. MALIK,

    1. The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2006
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences

  • PJ CANFIELD

    1. The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2006
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Pathology


Abstract

Objective To determine the FeLV status of sera and tumours from Australian cats with lymphosarcoma in relation to patient characteristics, tumour characteristics (tissue involvement, histological grade and immunophenotype), haematological and biochemical values.

Design Prospective study of 107 client-owned cats with naturally-occurring lymphosarcoma.

Procedure An ELISA was used to detect FeLV p27 antigen in serum specimens collected from cats with lymphosarcoma. A PCR was used to detect FeLV DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections containing neoplastic lymphoid cells. The PCR was designed to amplify a highly conserved region of the untranslated long terminal repeat of FeLV provirus.

Results Only 2 of 107 cats (2%), for which serum samples were available, were FeLV-positive on the basis of detectable p27 antigen in serum. In contrast, 25 of 97 tumours (26%) contained FeLV DNA. Of the 86 cats for which both PCR and ELISA data were available, 19(22%) had FeLV provirus in their tumours but no detectable circulating FeLV antigen in serum, while 2 (2%) had FeLV provirus and circulating FeLV antigen. FeLV PCR-positive/ELISA-negative cats (19) differed from PCR-negative/ELISA-negative cats (65) in having fewer B-cell tumours (P = 0.06), more non B-/non T-cell tumours (P = 0.02) and comprising fewer non-Siamese/Oriental pure-bred cats (P = 0.03).

Conclusions The prevalence of FeLV antigen or provirus was considerably lower in our cohort of cats compared with studies of lymphosarcoma conducted in the Northern hemisphere. This suggests that factors other than FeLV are important in the development of lymphosarcoma in many Australian cats. No firm conclusions could be drawn concerning whether FeLV provirus contributed to the development of lymphosarcoma in PCR-positive/ELISA-negative cats.

Ancillary