The Prospect of Plasticity: Malleability Views of Group Differences and their Implications for Intellectual Achievement, Mental/Behavioral Health, and Public Policy

Authors


Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton [e-mail: rmd@berkeley.edu] and Andres G. Martinez [e-mail: andymartinez@berkeley.edu], Psychology Department, 3210 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650 [e-mail: rmd@berkeley.edu].
 The authors thank the members of the Hinshaw Laboratory, as well as the Relationships and Social Cognition Laboratory (RASCL), for their valuable comments and helpful suggestions. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers, John F. Dovidio, Victoria M. Esses, Stephen P. Hinshaw, and Paul K. Piff for their useful feedback. Andres G. Martinez received support from a National Science Foundation IGERT Fellowship.

Abstract

This article critically examines the psychological and policy implications of the belief that characteristics of social groups are grounded in biology and thus are unchangeable. We specifically focus on how this immutability mind-set may perpetuate group-based educational achievement gaps and deter treatment seeking for mental/behavioral health conditions. We then consider the prospect of plasticity: the notion that psychological attributes, although rooted in our biological endowment, are inherently malleable. Our discussion reviews the evidence for—and social implications of—this alternative mind-set for intellectual achievement as well as mental/behavioral health. We conclude by describing several concrete policy applications of a plasticity perspective.

Ancillary