SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., Maner, J. K., & Schaller, M. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): From out-group homogeneity to outgroup-hetereogeneity. Psychological Science , 17, 836840.
    Direct Link:
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice . Washington , DC : Perseus.
  • Bartolomey, D. (2001). Cross-racial identification testimony and what not to do about it: A comment on the cross-racial jury charge and cross-racial expert identification testimony. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7, 247252.
  • Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science , 18, 706712.
    Direct Link:
  • Billig, M., & Milner, D. (1976). A spade is a spade in the eyes of the law. Psychology Today , 2, 1316.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Brigham, J. C. (1981). Accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it Social Action and the Law , 7, 7679.
  • Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior , 7, 1930.
  • Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 42, 673681.
  • Brigham, J. C., & Ready, D. J. (1985). Own-race bias in lineup construction. Law and Human Behavior , 9, 415424.
  • Carithers, M. W. (1970). School desegregation and racial cleavage, 1954–1970: A review of the literature. Journal of Social Issues , 26, 2547.
  • Carlson, C. A., Gronlund, S. D., & Clark, S. E. (2008). Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 14, 118128.
  • Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior , 29, 575604.
  • Clifford, B. R., & Richards, V. J. (1977). Comparison of recall by policemen and civilians under conditions of long and short durations of exposure. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 45, 503512.
  • Corneille, O., Huart, J., Becquart, E., & Bredart, S. (2004). When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: Accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 86, 236250.
  • Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior , 14, 185191.
  • Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology , 72, 629637.
  • Deffenbacher, K. A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship Law and Human Behavior , 4, 243260.
  • Deffenbacher, K. A., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior Law and Human Behavior , 6, 1530.
  • Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General , 115, 107117.
  • Doyle, J. M. (2001). Discounting the error costs: Cross-racial false alarms in the culture of contemporary criminal justice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7, 253262.
  • Elliott, E. S., Wills, E. J., & Goldstein, A. G. (1973). The effects of discrimination training on the recognition of white and oriental faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 2, 7173.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 174). New York: Academic Press.
  • Fradella, H. F. (2006). Why judges should admit expert testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Federal Courts Law Review , 3, 129.
  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model . Philadelphia : The Psychology Press.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations , 20, 271290.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Nier, J. A., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., Houlette, M., & Loux, S. (2000). The Common Ingroup Identity Model for reducing intergroup bias: Progress and challenges. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory in research (pp. 133148). London: Sage.
  • Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience , 3, 191197.
  • Goldsmith, W. W., & Blakely, E. J. (2010). Separate societies: Poverty and inequality in U.S. Cities . Philadelphia : Temple.
  • Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1985). Effects of training on Japanese face recognition: Reduction of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 23, 211214.
  • Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics . New York : Wiley.
  • Hancock, K., J., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding, and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology , 99, 4556.
  • Hehman, E., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010). Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial recognition effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 46, 445448.
  • Hope, L., & Wright, D. (2007). Beyond unusual? Examining the role of attention in the weapon focus effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 21, 951961.
  • Hugenberg, K., Miller, J., & Claypool, H. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 2007 , 334340.
  • Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review , 117, 11681187.
  • Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 616626.
  • Jonsson, P. (2007). The police lineup is becoming suspect practice. Christian Science Monitor . (Downloaded June 15, 2011, from http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0206/p01s02-usju.html).
  • Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience , 17, 43024311.
  • Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 22, 13641382.
  • Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 129, 559574.
  • Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 5, 212228.
  • Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994).Expectations of eyewitness performance: Jurors’ verdicts do not follow from their beliefs. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 362384). New York : Cambridge.
  • Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 70, 556564.
  • Lipton, J. P. (1996). Legal aspects of eyewitness testimony. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 722). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Loftus, E. F. (1974). Reconstructing memory: The incredible eyewitness. Psychology Today , 8, 116119.
  • Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony . Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about “weapon focus. Law and Human Behavior , 11, 5562.
  • Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 4, 1931.
  • MacLin, O. H., MacLin, K. M., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Race, arousal, attention, exposure, and delay: An examination of factors moderating face recognition. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7, 134152.
  • MacLin, O. H., & Malpass, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law , 7, 98118.
  • MacLin, O. H., & Malpass, R. S. (2003). The ambiguous-race face illusion. Perception , 32, 249252.
  • Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology , 51, 93120.
  • Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Calvini, G. (1999). Seeing more than we can know: Visual attention and category activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 35, 590602.
  • Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V, Milne, A. B., Thorn, T. M. J., & Castelli, L. (1997). On the activation of social stereotypes: The moderating role of processing objectives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 33, 471489.
  • Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology , 66, 482489.
  • Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 13, 330334.
  • Malpass, R. S., Lavigueur, H., & Weldon, D. E. (1973). Verbal and visual training in face recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , 14, 285292.
  • Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C. G., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2009). Public policy and sequential lineups. Legal and Criminological Psychology , 14, 112.
  • Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7, 335.
  • Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Memory and Cognition , 33, 783792.
  • Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of our own race. Psychological Science , 17, 608615.
    Direct Link:
  • New Jersey v. Cromedy, 727 A.2d 456, 467 (N. J., 1999).
  • Ng, W., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 25, 217232.
  • O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition , 22, 208224.
  • Pauker, K., Weisbuch, M., Ambady, N., Sommers, S. R., Adams, R. B., & Ivcevic, Z. (2009). Not so black and white: Memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96, 795810.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 90, 751783.
  • Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology , 88, 760763.
  • Phillips, M., McAuliff, B., Kovera, M. B., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology , 84, 940951.
  • Platz, S. J., & Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial ethnic eyewitness identification: A field-study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18, 972984.
  • Quinn, K. A., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). Familiarity and person construal: Individuating knowledge moderates the automaticity of category activation. European Journal of Social Psychology , 39, 852861.
  • Quinn, K. A., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). When Arnold is “The Terminator,” we no longer see him as a man: The temporal determinants of person perception. Experimental Psychology , 57, 2735.
  • Rhodes, G., Brake, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology , 80, 313331.
    Direct Link:
  • Rhodes, G., Lie, H. C., Ewing, L., Evangelista, E., & Tanaka, J. W. (2010). Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 36, 217223.
  • Rhodes, G., Locke, V., Ewing, L., & Evangelista, E. (2009). Race coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. Perception , 38, 232241.
  • Rodin, M. J. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard. Social Cognition , 5, 144165.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research . Newbury Park , CA : Sage.
  • Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004). Recognition of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 45, 12191227.
  • Sangrigoli, S., Pallier, C., Argenti, A. M., Ventureyra, V. A. G., & de Schonen, S. (2005). Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science 16, 440444.
  • Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2003). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right . New York : Signet.
  • Schooler, J. W., Ryan, R. S., & Reder, L. (1996). The costs and benefits of verbally rehearsing memory for faces. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research (Vol. 2, pp. 5166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin , 100, 139156.
  • Shriver, E. R., & Hugenberg, K. (2010). Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 46, 767774.
  • Shriver, E. R., Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Lanter, J. R. (2008). Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 34, 260274.
  • Sporer, S. L. (2001). The cross-race effect: Beyond recognition of faces in the laboratory. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law , 7, 170200.
  • Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin , 118, 315327.
  • Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior , 16, 413424.
  • Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influences in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior , 21, 283297.
  • Susa, K. J., Meissner, C. A., & de Heer, H. (2010). Modeling the role of social-cognitive processes in the recognition of own- vs. other-race faces. Social Cognition , 28, 523537.
  • Tanaka, J. W., & Pierce, L. J. (2009). The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience , 9, 122131.
  • Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A , 43, 161204.
  • Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology , 44A, 671703.
  • Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2011). Modulation of the Fusiform Face Area following minimal exposure to motivationally relevant faces: Evidence of in-group enhancement (not out-group disregard). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 23, 33433354.
  • Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology , 64, 440448.
  • Wells, G. L., & Luus, C. A. E. (1990). Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly conducted lineups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 16, 106117.
  • Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2001). The other-race effect in eyewitness identification: What do we do about it Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law , 7, 230246.
  • Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology , 54, 277295.
  • Wilson, J. P., & Hugenberg, K. (2010). When under threat, we all look the same: Distinctiveness threat induces ingroup homogeneity in face memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 46, 10041010.
  • Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). A national survey of U.S. police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups. Psychology, Crime, and Law , 10, 6982.
  • Yarmey, A. D. (1979). Psychology of eyewitness testimony . New York : Free Press.
  • Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Hugenberg, K. (2010). When do own-group biases in face recognition occur? Encoding versus post-encoding. Social Cognition , 28, 240250.
  • Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2012). Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the Own Race Bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science , 3, 8087.
  • Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2009). Interracial contexts debilitate same-race face recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 45, 11231126.
  • Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2012). Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the Cross Race Effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review 16, 116142.
  • Yuille, J. C. (1993). We must study forensic eyewitnesses to know about them. American Psychologist , 48, 572573.
  • Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1998). Processing resources and eyewitness suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology , 3, 305320.
    Direct Link: